Talk:White Amur Tiger

	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Cats This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles

Text and/or other creative content from White Amur Tiger was copied or moved into White tiger with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I think this the purposes of this page might best be served if it was merged into Amur Tiger. If anyone knows how to go about merging pages or starting discussions about such things on Wikiprojects_Cats, I'd appreciate some help. Kpstewart (talk) 03:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was merged into Siberian tiger on 25 sept with these edits, however the merge has been reverted twice at Siberian tiger so I have reverted the redirect that was placed here. It would appear that more discussion is needed before this merge can go ahead. ascidian | talk-to-me 10:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection this article is already covered at White tiger where it is better written (and referenced). Would anyone mind if I redirected (no merge needed) this article (and White Siberian Tiger) there? ascidian | talk-to-me 15:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, this sounds fine. I'll also try at some point to make the target article less... dense. Seduisant (talk) 18:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree with the Redirect, I think only 1 article covering white tigers is appropriate, makes alot less work for us thats for sure. Better to have 1 fantastic article then 5 or 6 stubs with no value. ZooPro (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]