User talk:75.102.250.54

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Book of Daniel (album)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@Flyer22 Reborn: You reverted too many edits, re-adding all the problematic content. I just now edited the subjective link I made to maintain WP:NPOV. 75.102.250.54 (talk) 14:47, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktrimi991: I'm just trying to fix the formatting, writing style, and information(and lack thereof). Danny himself (and one of his fans, from the looks of it), just keeps reinstating non-neutral information that is at best original research, and at worst primary sourcing and self-promotion. 75.102.250.54 (talk) 18:05, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert again. Explain your rationale on the following link, and wait till other editors comment. If nobody comments in a week or so, feel free to revert [1]. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktrimi991: if I go on the talk page, all that's gonna happen is Danny's gonna go on there, pretending to be someone else(yet not even putting forth the effort to make an account) and try to rationale why there's nothing wrong with the obviously self-aggrandizing, poorly formatted, and unsourced content that was originally on the article. You can read the differences between the old version and my last version and see what I'm talking about. But I'll check the talk page anyway, I guess. 75.102.250.54 (talk) 18:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:75.102.250.54 reported by User:Ktrimi991 (Result: ). Thank you. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]