User talk:Aceofhearts1968

Welcome!

Hello, Aceofhearts1968, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm wondering about these pictures:

• File:TEOTIHUACAN VIEW FROM SUN PYRAMID.jpg license {{PD-self}} author Asen Ranguelov
• File:TEOTIHUA MOON PYRAMID-1.jpg license {{PD-self}} author Felipe Quintana
• File:TEOTIHUACAN CALZADA DE LOS MUERTOS.jpg license {{PD-self}} author Asen Ranguelov
• File:UNAM-library-MURAL.jpg license {{PD-self}} author Felipe Quintana

The images are not taken by the same person so you can not be the one who has taken all four images. Could you tell us if you are one of these two persons and how you got the copyrights to the images you did not take yourself? --MGA73 (talk) 15:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • Asen Ranguelov is my name. Felipe Quintana was my significant other at the time and he took the pictures with my camera :-). So, I am the owner of the original negatives (it was in the time of analog photography).

OK, thank you. That explains why :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andrea Prader, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/90.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This issue has been addressed the same day. Thx.--Aceofhearts1968 (talk) 10:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karaağaç, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what I meant is Turkish language. Aceofhearts1968 (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cortes Bank, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Freighter and Atocha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cortes Bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilmington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert your recent change because you managed to make rather a mess - several parts of the article were duplicated. I couldn't easily see what you were actually improving, else I would have cleared it up myself. Sorry, but you'll have to re-apply your edit (I mean what you wanted to do, not what you actually did!) John of Cromer (talk) mytime= Fri 07:08, wikitime= 06:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of the version saved. If you carefully look you would see that my edition was merely directing the dental formula o the appropriate section rather than the full article dentition. I find it annoying to be referred to material that you have to further look up Aceofhearts1968 (talk) 02:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bozhidar Dimitrov because they did not appear constructive. The section you have added concerns the works of Dimitrov about the history of Bulgaria, not on the Macedonian issue. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not experimenting. I responded to an inflammatory content of that ridiculous CONTROVERSY paragraph. If you know history, Balkan history in particular, you know what I mean. To call the claims of B. Dimitrov inconsistent is grоundles, baseless and shameless. You cannot remove the editions based on your "constructive" opinionAceofhearts1968 (talk) 21:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did some reading of your postings regarding the issues. And I am surprised that you fail to recognize the true controversy. The only matter that inflames the person BD is his defense of Bulgarian historic heritage. Now, that I was born in Moesia, and lived between the capital city and Pazardzhik, does not make me Moesian, Dobrugjan, or Thracian. I remain Bulgarian. If someone decides, however, to name themselves after their geographic region it is fine with me, however, to falsify the whole of history for the sake of an official lie - is not ok. In that sense, the controversy in the person of BD is that he professes not merely a belief that clashes with the official Makedon propaganda, but rather, he displays incontrovertible historic information that the people in power in RM cannot stomach. O, well! Too bad! It is nice that the 10 statements, which are not the only proof of our common roots, are immediately following the CONTROVERSY, and I do invite editors, who believe that the controversy is only in his "unsupported claims" to dig in the rest of Wikipedia and diligently make changes, backed by GOOD research and literature. Aceofhearts1968 (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited De re metallica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]