User talk:BigBullfrog

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bigbullfrog1996! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nardog (talk) 11:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for adding IPA transcriptions! Although I appreciate them, I thought I'd let you know that we use ⟨‿⟩ only for liaison, i.e. when a consonant arises only when prevocalic, not for mere enchaînement. I also found some instances of your transcriptions in which the Greek epsilon ⟨ε⟩ was used in place of the correct IPA letter, the Latin epsilon ⟨ɛ⟩. (Editors here also tend to prefer ⟨ɡ⟩ instead of the ASCII ⟨g⟩ and transcribe e muet as ⟨(ə)⟩ and orthographic è as ⟨ɛː⟩, but these are even more minor quibbles and you may see lots of transcriptions that contradict these conventions.) That said, I appreciate your contributions and I hope you'll stick around here. If you have any questions about the way we transcribe French in IPA, visit Help talk:IPA/French. Happy editing! Nardog (talk) 11:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nardog: Hi, I use ⟨‿⟩ for enchaînement because of its usage in French Wiktionary, just like this, this, this and so on. And, what should I use for enchaînement if I stop using ⟨‿⟩? In my memory, I did't use the Greek epsilon ⟨ε⟩. Can you please give me some examples? Finally thanks for your reminder. --Bigbullfrog1996 (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just use a space. See this, this, or this for examples. As for the Greek epsilon, you had it on Luzech, Leers, and Brennilis, but I've fixed them so you don't need to worry about it. Nardog (talk) 03:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nardog: Ok, I will use a space instead of ⟨‿⟩ for enchaînement. As for the examples of Greek epsilon ⟨ε⟩ , I found that I copied them from French articles, I will pay attention from now on. Finally thanks for your reply. --Bigbullfrog1996 (talk) 08:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Lès, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lès instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lès and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lès, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bigbullfrog1996! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please take note of my edit at Deutschlandsberg. I formatted the transcription in order to match Help:IPA/Standard German, which is one of the many language-specific reference pages for IPA transcriptions on the English Wikipedia. Make sure whenever you add one it is backed up by the help page it is linked to (if there is one, as is the case for {{IPA-de}}). And mind the stress mark too! ;)

Regards. 〜イヴァンスクルージ九十八［IvanScrooge98］（会話） 07:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bigbullfrog1996 Would you like to translate the article about Isabelle de Charriere for the ZH Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 11:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISO 639 name fra-frc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chemillé-Melay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melay. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tributaries of the Sèvre Nantaise indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mesnil-en-Ouche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mesnil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pays-de-Clerval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clerval.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you modified some of the Category:France commune (country subdivision) templates to show the prefecture and subprefectures separately. I think it looks better (takes up less space) if we list these along with the other communes, and maybe highlight them, or add a note. See {{Ain communes}} for instance. Do you mind if I change the other templates like this as well? Markussep ^Talk 10:16, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Markussep:No problem.--Bigbullfrog1996（𓆏） 14:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, İlkay Gündoğan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aspres-lès-Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Near.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argoat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argoed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RCorrèze has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you use {{IPA|fr instead of {{IPA-fr (and so on)? IPA-xx templates have been deprecated and it would make the transition a lot easier if you used the new template since you edit a ton. Thanks! Nardog (talk) 09:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In October 2023, you created {{CH-VS}} and about 25 similar templates. They should have been created as a single template, but regardless of that, most of them continue to be unused. Do you have a plan to use them? If not, they should be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CH-AG has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CH-AI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sub-municipalities of in Liège Province indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bigbullfrog1996,

Category redirects are not created like article redirects. Please look at the code/template on this page and use this as an example if you want to make category redirects in the future. If you just use the standard code like for article redirects, then the category appears on the Empty Categories list and will likely get tagged for deletion. It's easy to remember once you see how it is done. Thanks very much. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Limburg Province templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Autelbas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rhisnes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Rhisnes. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geography of West Germany has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 00:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BigBullfrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Autelbas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BigBullfrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rhisnes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argoat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argoed. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]