User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive06

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Can you please tell me why you deleted "my version" of the biography of Igor Sikorsky? OK, it's not the best written article ever, but it does have a lot more information the the version before that. I just started to get into Wikipedia and you are not encouraging me. Mabey you have a good reason for that, if so, tell me so I can learn! Mariah-Yulia 01:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to add material to the Ford Mustang SSP page, and the table that I added doesn't want to work properly. Parts of the table with info refuses to show up. Can you please assist? I don't want to add more material to the article lest it worsens the situation even further. --Cantthinkofausername 10:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

"Black" in the tables was my attempt to turn the Green of the "First Generation" bar to Black to match the top. So I just pasted the top table | boxcolor = Black to the table. --Cantthinkofausername 10:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I'll try and fiddle around with it abit more. --Cantthinkofausername 10:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

That looks much, much better. Thanks again!!--Cantthinkofausername 11:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Gotcha, sorry.

The problem is that I believe that "ABLE ARCHER 83" is the correct title for the article. The actual military exercise was spelled as ABLE ARCHER 83. Is it worth changing this, or will it just muck everything up?

Are you an administrator? Please respond A.S.A.P.--Gator Fan 00:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Gators222

Wut ever..... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gators222 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 9 February 2006.

Why did you remove my revisions to Tina Berry? I saw this on the news this evening and it needs to be added. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.160.180.50 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 9 February 2006.

The local news said so. We could just go on my personal recognizance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.160.180.50 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 9 February 2006.

For reverting the vandalism on my talk-page. smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 15:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have edited the Katie Holmes page in the past. I've completely reworked the article and have posted it on WP:PR in the hopes of advancing it to WP:FAC. I would be grateful for your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting it! That's the second time today. I must be doing something right :) Raven4x4x 08:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why did you delete my things —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.101.64.180 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 10 February 2006.

Heh, you're welcome! As it was, it took me ~3+ hours to get done what I did with AWB doing an edit every ~6 seconds. I noticed towards the end it looked like we were tripping over each other, but hey, it looks like it's done! I did nominate Category:Airports of Prince Edward Island be renamed to Category:Airports on Prince Edward Island - seems to make more sense, such as Category:Airports in the Yukon. —akghetto ^talk 11:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments.

Both La Grande 3 and 4 airfields are serving only the hydro stations, there is not a community nearby. I am not much in favor of creating stub articles (in this case for La Grande-4) and neither does it make sense to link the location served to the James Bay Project (too broad) unless this article get expanded to describe all hydro stations individually (I'm considering that for the near future - at that time I will probably redirect the La Grande-3 stub to this article).

Also, did you know that are 2 more airfields farther along at La Forge 1 and 2. These are not listed in any article...

You talked about personal attacks. Did i do that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gators222 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 11 February 2006.

Regarding what you said here: I did archive the page, but someone took it out. Here it is. Aucaman^Talk 08:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is a legitimate way of archiving pages. See Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page. In my opinion it's actually better. Aucaman^Talk 09:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude calm down with your "Thanks for experimenting wikipedia" messages, I was just deleting the redirect from the Neill Corlett article to the PSF article, to write an article for him, since he did more things. Remember to verify the time of the edit next time, kthx.

Ok, i get your point. Although, it shows, that you have alot of extra time to go through my stuff lol! K, what do i do when a dum a. vandal does something, say stop plz. If you read what they said, they were vulgar. And i see people in talk, even in admin's talk, they say "shit" dum a. and more stuff. So im not the only one.--Gators222 19:16, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Gators222

Well, did you see my message about me not the only one, i would really like your input on it dude.--Gators222 00:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Gators222

To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at Talk:Units of measurement. Thanks. bobblewik 22:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article which you deleted has now been recreated (by a sockpuppet of user:Apim128). I've listed it for speedy deletion. Mikker ^... 00:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, it has now been deleted. Thanks! Mikker ^... 00:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These links have good information, just like the other links on the silver-age Superboy. Why do his links get to stay but not links on Kon-El? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.33.38.252 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 13 February 2006.

Hi, please stop saying I am a vandal, I am improving wikipedia by clearing out duplicate articles and fixing typosquatting. Instead of having "internet" and "the internet", I am redirecting one to the other. Hardly vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.238.236.74 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 13 February 2006.

All in good jest my friend. Made my day, actually. ^_^ 12.72.245.68 07:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, whoops. I'm Cernen; I'm just not logged in. 12.72.245.68 07:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm just wondering if you would like to sign this BLACKLISTED LINK REMOVED. It's a petition for getting the original voice actors for the Sonic games back (instead of the Sonic X ones). --anon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.118.79.122 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 14 February 2006.

There are a few redundant suburbs there that need to be fixed up.

08:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)60.225.200.50

yes apologies for the incoherency, I am still a very raw member of wikipedia.

08:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)The man from OZ

Apologies for deleting that link - your rearrangement is far more logical. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.196.234.93 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 14 February 2006.

I get what to do, Thank You. --Gators222 21:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Gators222

I expect to be merging two articles. Their lengths are in a ratio of approximately 3:1. Both have been translated to other languages. Do I

1. Leave the "into" list as is,
2. Combine the two lists, or
3. Remove all lists?

The larger has 23 citations, the smaller has 20.

The first two schemes show that translations exist; the third might help alert non-English Wikipedias that the job will need to be redone. What is the proper thing to do? Thank you. B00P 04:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri. B00P 20:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

get a life and stop stalking my canadian friend. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.190.200.38 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 15 February 2006.

This is really helpful when the vandals come back and remind you to check up on them. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for helping me with my page. Dog Eat Dog World 22:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ive been given a final warning for removing the team pseudoflux article for you as you seem so desperate to remove it. seeing as i started the article dont see how removing it is vandalism! please sort it out and stop being so petty

you guys didnt seem to mind vandalising the improvements made to that article..

oh and just so you know the emboldened "michael warner" was an addition i made i was simply removing the emboldenment as you had removed my additions

VANDALISM... so is removing other persons additions may i also point out that publicly displaying a person IP address breaks the data protection act as well as the basic human right of privacy..

your comment of "If I was to nonsense into an article such as "Person X is the best in the world" and you removed it that would not be vandalism on your part." is very uncouth as 1) it was not stating that "Person X is the best in the world" at all so please stop insulting your own intelligence. 2) with myself being the founder of an organisation and helping hundreds of young persons take an interest in being active. ive also had multiple people tell me how learning parkour has helped them to the point where they no longer wish to commit suicide.. then yes you must me right it was complete nonsense you were right to remove it.

Let them see it in the history then fair enough if you guys log it but you have no right to display it here! my IP is not GNU buddy. ive noticed you seem to pick and choose which parts in this section have their IP's displayed. I dont see yours anywhere alan tad unfair i think.

Im just removing each time what I consider to be a major security threat. if you dont like me removing my own personal details STOP adding them to this page!

~ ~ EXTRACT FROM THE DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 ~ ~ Ensure that your website transmits information securely. This means that it will have to use suitable encryption. Ask whoever builds or operates your website for advice on this.

Remember that you shouldn't publish personal information on your website without consent. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ May i now point out to you that you A) DO NOT HAVE MY CONCENT TO PUBLISH MY IP ADDRESS B) THIS IS THE MOST UNSECURE WEB THAT I KNOW OF AS ANYONE HAS ACCESS TO THIS PAGE AND ANYONE MAY VIEW THE DETAILS DISPLAYED HERE.

TAKE MY IP OFF NOW OR I WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION!! MY WIKI USERNAME IS "MINI MIKE" USE THIS IF YOU HAVE TO ELSE LOOK FORWARD TO A NICE LEGAL BATTLE!! BUT WITH THE LAW ON MY SIDE LOOK FORWARD TO LOSING.

right this is now on your dispute resolution section. i hope this can be resolved in a MATURE fashion else my last comment still stands true.

Thanks for sorting this matter out. sorry for causing you unnessisary grief Mini mike 23:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, great, sorry if the edit summary seemed a little prickish. Ouuplas 20:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not adding nonsense. I am making changes to an article that result in greater accuracy. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.197.40.205 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 17 February 2006.

I checked the policy on vandalism, and according to the defintion, I am not in violation. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.197.40.205 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 17 February 2006.

Ok I am not adding nonsense. I am making changes to an article that has a half-balding cyclops who obviously MOOOOOOOO /moo eat it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.49.11.242 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 18 February 2006.

Hi, I was just wondering if you would like to sign this BLACKLISTED LINK REMOVED. It's a petition for getting the original voice actors back for the Sonic games (instead of the Sonic X voice actors). 71.105.13.135 01:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You're welcome. Cheers TigerShark 10:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well if it is a hoax, I'd like to be proven otherwise. Any related reading you can come up with would help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.193.44.53 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 19 February 2006.

Here's the info:

The email picture is probably a fake as a aegolius funereus is a Tengmalm's Owl which looks nothing like a Snowy Owl as the O RLY? article says it is. As for the albino Boreal, well a Boreal owl would be a albino Tengmalm's Owl. The two owls look nothing alike and the O RLY owl looks more like a Snowy Owl. Plus the O RLY owl looks like a stuffed bird. Also this indicates that the email at the zoo is invalid. Here's the original fake email. Cheers CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

actually i just figured since everyone else has a wiki site it was just common sense to get a place on there ya know not for advertising, if I was doing that I'd give links to people on where to order it and such. I'm simply trying to forge it a place on the large wikipedia community. 16:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

           OKay thanks for the pointers, I appreciate it

I didn't add and they're full of idiots, generally probaly added by someone because of the mass editing to that non-notable website, I wonder why with the mass editing to that site recently, could something happened there that made it notable? Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah probaly a edit conflect or I think that I was checking for vandalism and I accidently placed it a older version, that what probaly happened --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slight misunderstanding. Captaintomx did not remove comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic's Most Wanted! page. He left comments on my talk page and then when replying deleted them to add new ones. Just a simple error. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, CambridgeBayWeather. I was actually referring to this (which was probably unintentional) but chose to use the template {{drmafd}}, which mentions both removing AfD tags and comments. I apologize if it caused any confusion. Regards, Sango123 (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to please protect the Turkish Cypriots page? I have to go in a bit. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 08:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! --Khoikhoi 08:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help with this article. I've nominated it as a FAC and would appreciate your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Katie Holmes. PedanticallySpeaking 16:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I guess I missed that. The airline project decided to just use the infobox, so I wrongly assumed that the same went for airports. Dbinder 17:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you change the page of "Turkish Cypriots" with this [1].No Greek POV please.Thanks...Inanna 22:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't - this is what the dipute is about - the numbers. We're still trying to work things out. --Khoikhoi 22:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please do that? Because dont be fool that propagandist's.If look all his edits, you will see...Inanna 13:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out all her contributions and you'll discover a long history of changing statisics without providing a source and using POV websites. --Khoikhoi 18:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want to put the template Football in Cyprus in the Cyprus Cup but unfortunatelly is very bad. see what I mean:

Can you help me please???? User:KRBN

I need the template WITHOUT the clubs to put it in Cyprus Cup and WITH THE CLUBS in Cypriot First Division. See the example of the Template:FA Premier League. Why that template is OK and Football in Cyprus not?User:KRBN

That's how I had it. User:KRBN

If you can't help me, do u know how to find someone who is expert to such things? User:KRBN

OK. Thank u very much for your effort to help. Best Regards User:KRBN

hey that was a mistake and not vandalism

i think that picture is wrong because many of the green countries support israel —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guz (talk • contribs) 12:08, 21 February 2006.

yest, I made a mistake "catagory" - needs to be removed; will look at googles lattee Pflatau 23:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A vote is running to rename Category:Nephology. Perhaps you may say your opinion here. Pavel Vozenilek 21:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you graciously for your welcoming message. I hope to enjoy this place as well. --293.xx.xxx.xx 00:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the 555 telephone number page for my user id, it comes from the movie Swordfish (film). Speaking of which, need to make wiki linkage to that too. --293.xx.xxx.xx 00:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the advice. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 23:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comments on the talk page. The problem is that the PROD should not have been added a second time. So I've listed it at AfD now Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lulu Lemon. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:02, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think we can just use common sense in such situations instead of becoming all legalistic, but like I said, it's not like it hurts to move it to AfD. NickelShoe 01:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the user's page. See WP:AN/I.Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 21:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, we all make mistakes. SFrank85 23:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping an eye out, for once I was actually away from the computer all day. As for 80.217.152.161, I've wondered if he's been doing the same things on the Swedish or Somali Wikipedias that he's been doing here. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked out of curiosity, and it doesn't look like he has, but maybe he actually has a user account on the other Wikipedias. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I use this website from home, but only come here periorically from my school computer. I have never edited an article on wikipedia from this computer, or any in the school network. I have tried to edit pages from home, mostly correcting spelling mistakes or changing formatting so it fits with the rest of the page, and once or twice correcting broken links, but I have always been blocked. This time it said my IP adress is 64.42.226.63, which I cannot verify on a school computer, but why am I being blocked at home as well? I use an account when trying to edit pages, but never do so at school. Please help me.

Maybe someone vandalised pages, but it wasn't me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.42.226.63 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 27 February 2006.

According to the block log you are not blocked. Otherwise you would not be able to edit my talk page. The warning I gave you was based on this edit. The best thing is to get an account. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CBW. Vicki here. you helped me on the swinging sections. They took out your link of the jewelry. I have been posting around to that section but now people i send cannot see everthing we had added.

Can you help?

Thanks

Vicki xoxo

I now feel suitably terrible! For the record I have contributed positively on a variety of topics. I can only apologise for my recent poor performance which was as a result of a moment of sheer boredom.

Thanks, Greg

Hi! I just wanted to warn you that this IP address is a dial-up connection. I am use Wikipidia a lot and haven't done anything approaching Vandalizem. But blocking this IP won't do anything I think. I could be wrong about that though.

The remark was from last october in reference to this edit. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just discovered that you reverted vandalism to my user page over two weeks ago. I only just noticed now. Thanks belatedly! Raven4x4x 08:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just went to the Ferrari Enzo Ferrari page, and I noticed that it's slowly turning into a mess!! My reference link to one part of the article has turned into a bloated mess of....mindless info. There seems to be someone trying to insert a ton of images as well. I don't know where to start trying to help revert the mess!! I'm also at a loss if it is vandalism, or someone's misguided attempt at making the article more informative!! --293.xx.xxx.xx 09:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the imput. I'm kinda pissed that they also messed up my only reference mark that I made for one of the owners[2] and seem to have mutated into.....whatever that was. I'll see if I can undo this mess without making a noob of myself. --293.xx.xxx.xx 23:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to ask you if there is any simple way how to make a reverted edit of article ... I usually select old article, copy the code, open actual and replace it. ... is there any better way? also any tag, how to write "Reverted edits by ----- (talk) to last version by ----" with interwiki links? :) Thanks Goliathus 09:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about adding things you consider nonsense, but its the truth, Raab Hinself was expelled from school for smearing fecitical waste on someones locker. If you watch the documentary on the first CKY video, they tell you the same thing. I was just trying to help your site, so I'm sorry.

Ok, thats sounds good to me, sorry again

Sorry, could i write an article about a high school?

Found some info about Alexander Wilson in an ND press release. I posted it and the link here: Talk:University_of_Notre_Dame#Alexander_Wilson_.28athlete.29. --MrCalifornia 00:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like a wikipedia article on wow emulation however there are few resources to site. I can site the gotwow.net page that's now under blizzard's control however that's only to show that it was indeed taken down. Evidence to prove most of the facts have been removed by blizzard. The plan was to get the article up and just have the old community edit it until it was correct. do you have any suggestions on how I should approach the situation?
Zite 07:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am not adding myself to articles. There is one, and only one, article with my name on it.

Hi! I'm still learning so I'm not sure what signing with the ~~~~ means. Sorry about that. Could you please restore the Lujan link to a Disambiguation page, (and leave the City of Luján as its own link)? There is information about supermodel Lujan Fernandez that I wanted to add to the Lujan page. Thank you. User:Lujanjl

nonsense? excuse me, but i think goro has an unbelievible importance to our society. While, On the other hand, neither you nor your webpage seem to, peasant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bishon (talk • contribs) 20:28, 4 March 2006.

You mean delete the chair image entirely from the server? Well, it would certainly be another hurdle the chairlovers would have to cross before putting it back on. :) I'm going to remove it from the page if I see it again, unless someone provides details as to what it adds to the article. As far as the image alignments, one thing I do is set my preferences to put the thumbnails at their maximum sizes, which catches a lot of wrapping problems. :) Turnstep 21:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you subtracted four from the number of arms goro has, you get as many friends as you have had your whole life —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bishon (talk • contribs) 22:49, 4 March 2006.

Thanks for your help. I have one question though, when replying to messages left on my user talk page, should I do it by editing my own page or by leaving a message on the other user's page? (like in this case). Thanks again. Lujanjl 12:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For a moment there I was afraid you were somehow accusing me of being an actual, incipient vandal! (No problem.) I had no memory of Jayant's peculiar suggestion. —Steve Summit (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny how you are supposed to be a sockpuppet of me when we've never crossed paths before :-D... As you may be aware, I've tagged as sockpuppets of User:Licinius the following editors: User:60.225.200.50, User:60.225.202.61, User:J is me, User:The man from OZ. This is a result of his/her/their conduct at Talk:Football, where J is me admitted that they "use the same computer". I suspect that there are more identities involved. Grant65 | Talk 03:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user re-created the page Victor kwan again, so as you say he'll be blocked could you please do so. Thanks, --Gary Kirk (talk) 13:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CBWeather,

Hey, I've been to Cambridge Bay and Holman (1994). Just wanted to drop by and let you know I'll be adding some photos of some obscure airports very gradually, I'm trying to do so without messing up your pages as they exist now. I see you added my Iqaluit terminal photo to the box on that airport page, looks nice!

I didn't thumbnail the ones I just added to Sachigo Lake as the page is so empty of any other content and the images are small, but I don't mind if you do so later on as the article grows. Technicalglitch 17:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry. I was just trying to be helpful by slimming down the article as was requested by another member. I'm very sorry.

Hello! Me too I was thinking that Montreal-Mirabel Airport has just 1 runway, but let me show what I found:http://www.admtl.com/cargo_services.aspx?id=60. here it shows 2 runways. I don't know if both are in use, but I think that if there are 2 runways we should put them on the article. I wait for an answer. Regards, NorbertArthur 6 March 2006

Regarding your warning about posting commercial links (or links to my own private websites) to Wikipedia - the site I added was neither a commercial website nor my own. It's especially silly that the link has been deleted in light of what is allowed.

(For example, the link to "Ted Nasmith Uncredited" is untouched: http://www.geocities.com/tednasmith/ But you won't allow a link to a fuller look at the same topic: http://www.angelfire.com/film/rings/art.html)

But it doesn't matter to me. I just thought considering JW's site has every LOTR movie fact under the sun (lots of which have ended up on wikipedia), it should be posted. I guess I was wrong.

Thank you for combatting vandalism on my user page. enochlau (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you. And a pleasure to see you, as well. ^_^ Cernen Xanthine Katrena 18:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, CBW!
You were kind enough to support the FAC candidacy of my article on Katie Holmes for which I am grateful. I've put forward another nomination, Ohio's lieutenant goveror Bruce Johnson and I would appreciate your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bruce Johnson. PedanticallySpeaking 21:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G'day. Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my page. I didn't notice I had been done over as you cleared it so quickly. Much obliged! Maustrauser 12:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I received a notice from you regarding placing personal links in the edits. This is not true, and my edits are being abused by others editors with different POV. I feel that they are vandalizing my edits, whereas I have never tried to alter any body else's posts. I would like clarification on this matter. The member NoToFrauds has a very strong POV and continues to vandalize my edits. I have made attempts by being very clear on all talk pages about my desire to come to an agreement with him and other editors. Other editors have been amenable to this, whereas NoToFrauds has tried to slander me and my edits with unverifiable opinions, and this has affected my relationship with other editors. I would urge a thorough investigation on this, and I would like to know what other ramifications there are for users constantly vandalizing my posts. Your help is much appreciated. Thank you. Hamsacharya dan 21:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CambridgeBayWeather,

I've written to you on my Talk page in regard to your response to my inquiry. I am not sure what Wikipedia policy is regarding these issues, and would like clarification about what are the proper actions that I should take to be fully in tow with Wikipedia policy while minimizing the adverse effects of the behaviors of these editors. Any help you can provide in curtailing destructive activities by these editors, and any information that you can provide regarding my current options would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

I would also like to know why that note I received had your signature on it. The note had a colored box with a hand in it, and a note from NoToFrauds to me. Outside of the colored box was a message about removing outside links in the body of entries, and was signed by you. I don't know how to retrieve that message after having closed out of that window.

Hamsacharya dan 23:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the birthday greetings, they're much appreciated. -- Francs2000 22:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

An editor asked me to monitor the above pages and a few more, saying somebody else was vandalizing them. Then that other editor said the first person was the vandal. I said I'd watch the pages. Somewhere in this melee, somebody mentioned you were already involved in mediating this. It sounds like a pretty normal editing conflict (and is way outside my realm of expertise). So, like I said, I'll monitor those pages for blatant vandalism; if there's anything I should know about this conflict, please let me know. Cheers, JDoorjam Talk 00:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oy. Ok. Thanks for letting me know. I'm going to try (perhaps fruitlessly, I suppose) to calm these folks down and work out some compromises. Regards, JDoorjam Talk 06:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE A DICK JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW WHO THE FUCK THE KRAMERS ARE DOES NOT MAKE THEM A NON-NOTEABLE BAND

THEY ARE HUGE AND HAVE OVER 500000 FANS!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.11.46 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 11 March 2006. but probably USer:MagicBaboon

Your biased comments and threats on my own personal Talk Page will not be tolerated. If you insist that what I have said were personal attacks then check out the words of the person you are defending on Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath Talk Page where he even referred to me as a "moron." So, if I call him a cultist (which he really is, his picture and contact information is even displayed in the cult's webpage) I am making personal attacks but when he calls me a fraud, a vandal and a moron it is alright. What's wrong with you? And so what if I used the warning sign? I never claimed to be a sysop or threaten him with anything that is beyond my ability as an ordinary editor. There is no pretension there. It was he who vandalized an article using a sockpuppet IP and said "nice quote, leave it there" as if he wasn't the one who put that article there in the first place. Something which he himself admitted doing. If you block me then there will always be sysops who will unblock me, and I will take it as a PERSONAL offense against you because you are biased.

NoToFrauds 22:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't leave that comment. The bassist of the Kramers did. Don't assume. Thanks.

Also, I didn't finish the article, I had to hit the hay. I was getting to the notability part.

Don't ya just love how this whole fiasco never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever ends? Bearcat 07:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forget about it my good man, I was only doing it as a homage to them.

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Apparently someone doesn't like me. Thanks! huntersquid 21:08, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

These attacks were posted by Pm_shef here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eyeonvaughan&oldid=41257881

Quotations:

• "Meanwhile this "reputable candidate" you keep referring to, Elliot Frankl, is a nutcase"

• "Sure maybe she's not as intelligent as someone like Elinor or other MP's, but she's a hell of a lot better than Racco, a sleazeball to the nth degree"

Pm_shef has already received his second warning. He should remove his many personal attacks soon, or otherwise some of these attacks will be removed and he will receive his third and final warning. UndergroundRailroad 01:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Indeed, following me calling User:MSJapan a "troublemaker", we resolved that dispute after he had explained to me his motivation for nominating for AfD. I have no malicious intent towards him. But I absolutely do not deserve two warnings, I simply did not violate WP:NPA where undergroundrailroad says I did -- pm_shef 02:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  AFAIK, the situation referred to with me is over and done with, and the situation has worked itself out amicably for all parties involved. I wouldn't really consider being called a "troublemaker" to violate WP:NPA; I've got a number of rants from various sockpuppets on my user talk page that fit that bill much more nicely than pm_shef's statement. Furthermore, if the current accusations have absolutely nothing to do with any WP user, as opposed to this being the result of a strongly worded opinion that somebody didn't like, why is this even an issue? MSJapan 03:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough. I think my statement should answer the question, though. MSJapan 03:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• What I've been saying the whole time. Thanks for helping work this out amicably. Maybe User:Undergroundrailroad will stop pestering me now. -- pm_shef 03:41, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CBW,

I wanted to ask how to get an image deleted? I uploaded a picture to the Nath page, and I made some added some text edits as well. The editors guarding the page are constantly removing my edits, so I'd like to take the picture away. I feel that it's not right to leave that for them, and I'm not here to constantly involve myself in edit wars. I feel really disturbed emotionally over all the slandering of the information I have been adding, and I don't think I can continue this. I guess this is the problem with wikipedia - the last man standing wins rather than there always being unbiased discussion and concensus. Anyway, back to the matter at hand. Regarding the image: the proper copyright info was never given in the first place - so it doesn't belong there. I've already marked it with the ifd tag, but it wasn't deleted - I think someone took off the tag. Or maybe I didn't do it right. Your help please? Thanks.. Hamsacharya dan 04:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CBW, I see that you are an administrator who has edited this article in the past. There is a current dispute on the article between User:Gbambino and one or more anonymous editors at Talk:Upper Canada College. This dispute led to an edit war that I ended by semi-protecting the page. I have attempted to mediate, but one of the anon editors does not accept that I am being impartial in this. I would appreciate you taking a look at the situation and providing your views. If I have been unfair, or if I could have handled this in a better way, I would like to know. Thanks, Ground Zero | t 16:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• It seems that the anon user does not see you as being neutral either, so I guess it wouldn't help having you involved. Sorry to bother you. Ground Zero | t 16:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. The above user (whom you have warned about this before) is again engaging in personal attacks in the most recent Talk:Mahavatar Babaji discussions. I am tempted to sanction him myself, but I have been actively editing the article, and I would like to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. Any input you could provide would be welcome. Regards, --Fire Star 23:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure how to do that. the link sends me to google.

I still don't really get it. but Okay... and theres money in it depending on the clints. like i said. the more points the better, the larger the better, and of corse sets are much preffred.

• I have no problem with the move at all. Cheers. PJM 12:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Normally, I would've responded to your message sooner, but I had to cut away from the Wiki earlier than usual last night. It's certainly a very sensible move. Regards. PJM 14:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As per your comment on my Talk page, I'm sorry, I don't understand... --gbambino 08:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doubly sorry - now I think I do see what you mean - the "semi-protected" tag. Yes, that was my carelessness. My apologies. --gbambino 08:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you ask me to merge the two articles would you like me to completely overlay 'Sir Ricahard Greenbury' on top of 'Richard Greenbury' only because much of my content, and all my format and order, has been taken from the later of the two. With the only addition of expanding largely on a greater variety of the topics.

May I ask how I might change Sir Richard Greenbury to a re-dirct, and how to add pictures to the article as I am having some trouble. Your help has been fantastic. Thankyou.

I didn't catch that one, thanks for beating me to it :) -- Tawker 00:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added links to the various websites from which I have taken media. I would just like to say thankyou for all the help you have given me, and respect the wondeful job you are obviously doing here at Wikipedia.

Cheers,

Edward.

how do u know it's original research? google lfoi and u'll soon find it isn't. the article itself proves it isn't. Jamaissur

LEARN about a topic b4 interfering w/ it. i see u're in canada -- how much do u know about uk politics? or do u just rely on innate infallibility? Jamaissur

it wasn't a personal attack. if i edited an article on a canadian topic, u disagreed w/ my editing and i clearly lived in the uk, u'd be perfectly right to question my knowledge. u're wrong about lfoi: it is not a single issue group. Jamaissur

i'm sorry, but if ignorance is defined as 'lacking knowledge of', u r indeed ignorant on this topic. lfi is not a single issue grp and it is not wise to rely on its 'official' summary to give a full and accurate picture of its raison d'etre. Jamaissur

Please keep in mind that User:Jamaissur's main activities on Wikipedia consist of:

• writing boilerplate articles on British Jews (or people he imagines are British Jews) convicted of crimes or associated with scandals, listing the most negative information available regarding them, and then adding them to Categories and Lists of British Jews;
• trying to link various Jews or criminals to Israel in some way, and particularly to imply dual-loyalty on their part; and
• copyediting articles on Holocaust Deniers and neo-Nazis, attempting to minimize criticism of them.

That should help put his "contributions" in context. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"he's a wicked thought-criminal -- pls join us in harassing him off wikipedia." as i said, it's a neglected area 4 some reason. but i deny that i have been "attempting to minimize criticism of" holo-deniers and neo-nazis. evidence 2 the contrary is welcomed. Jamaissur

"Though criminal"? I have no idea what's in your thought, Jamaissur. I've only commented on your actions. Does this accurate summary of your activities here put you in a bad light? I've certainly been more balanced regarding your actions than you have been regarding the many alleged British Jews on which you've been doing hatchet jobs, trying to tie them to crime and/or scandal, (and, of course, to Israel). Jayjg ^(talk) 17:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cam, I have had that article under semi-protection for about a week now, which is longer than semi-protection is intended for. I think that I should lift s-p tomorrow as an experiment to see if we can get back to normal editing. The article would need careful monitoring, and a willingness to return to semi-protection if disruption returns. Your thoughts? Ground Zero | t 18:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC) Thanks again for your contribution to resolving this dispute.[reply]

With all possible fingers crossed, I have lifted semi-protection. Regards, Ground Zero | t 18:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check its protection log and you will know who unprotected it. He doesn't seem to be interested in removing the notice when unprotect an article. --BorgQueen 00:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. There are two sides in the argument over the yoga pages centred on the above. One side seems to consist of 4 or 5 editors, most of whom are pretty reasonable, and User:Hamsacharya dan on the other, who can be reasonable, but is very persistent. The most difficult editor in the dispute is User:NoToFrauds, who has resorted to insults, name calling and generally assuming bad faith almost from the beginning. On top of that, I'd say a case can be made given his edit history that his username is a violation of our username policy. It boils down to a religious argument, one side says the other side isn't really a representative of their religion (hence "no to frauds"). Of course there is no way to prove any of this one way or the other. I've been trying for a bit to get things to a simpler, inoffensive edit that will calm things down, but the activity on the pages is pretty heavy, and things rapidly degenerate. Unfortunately, my computer was down most of yesterday and I am also working on similar themes at the Reiki and Falungong pages as well, so I haven't been able to pay a lot of attention to the dispute you've asked about. I've said all of that to say that I don't know what to do with them, either! User:Hamsacharya dan has gotten a 3RR block, which will quiet things down a bit. I put the page on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Religion and philosophy several days ago, but that hasn't gone anywhere. There is one editor whom I know that may be interested in this one, I'll ask him to look in on things. Regards, --Fire Star 01:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why cant i just make articels about me and my friends? Sure were not clebritys or anything but we just thought it would be cool if we were on Wikipedia. I dont see the problem. Its not like were hurting anyhting. I wont even delete the other info. Just make a new one about each of us

Kenny Brown

Careful re: the deletion - that's supposed to be (and was, until vandalism) an article about a notable blues musician. DS 14:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was curious about your nifty tool to tag unsigned comments. How does it work? Is there a template to use or do you have to do it manually? ClarkBHM 15:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That's the one.ClarkBHM 16:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 16:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add myself.

I added an up and coming footballer to the Knaresborough page. Wiki could be way more personal, I didn't realise it would be so heavily controlled and censored. Despite this, I think I'll investigate more.

Shame, I thought it was a good idea.

DON'T BE EVIL...

Ok, it looks like I had one of the bugs fixed (the non db lag version) but the db lag bug still needs some work, thanks for pointing it out -- Tawker 18:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

I note that your were involved with the downloading of a still from How the West Was Won on the Cinerama pages. I would like to download two still images, one each of the Kinopanorama films produced to date by Fifth Continent Australia Pty Ltd. I can not figure out how to do this. Can you assist? I would be more than pleased to email you jpeg images, and if you have the time you could download them on my behalf. I am wrting an article on Kinopanorama for the Australian Cinematographers Society. Also, I have the copyright permission from John Steven Lasher to download the photos. How do I indicate that the images are their copyright, so that no copyright infringement notice comes back from Wiki.

Jeremy Sefton-Parke --Kinopanorama widescreen 21:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please block per your comment on [3] with reference to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grace_Hopper&curid=12590&diff=44960898&oldid=44231607 Thanks. Perspective 18:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, was doing a bunch at once to revert a spammer and made the "second from the top" mistake on an active article. Corrected it. Dbchip 00:26, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deleting that picture, I rarely make an error so I don't have to ask anybody to delete a picture! If I become an Admin in the future, can I delete them then myself without giving a reason for deletion? Thanks. You can reply here. Death2 01:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You sent me an email saying i can not add links to Wikipedia but content i can. I'd be more than happy add content but i dont know what kind of site this is if it doesnt allow links to RELATED sites. Especially seeming this is an encyclopedia and already there are links to related topics why am i not allowed to share mine? This makes Wikipedia far more relevant, reliable and detailed.So i have to ask why are other sites allowed to be listed and not mine? This isnt for advertising its for convinience not for me but for readers of Wikipedia..."Oh this topic looks interesting i want to know more" then a related site is perfect...Honestly what kind of idea is that? To have no links allowed...This isnt a commercial or profit site so i dont see the problem. Explain please.

-Ram-

CBW--

 What is this about vandalism?  I have a message from you about this.  Anything I should know about?

--Dogcanteen

Okay i ask if you can please then keep my one link simply on the Ghosts Section on Wikipedia...Its Related (not unrelated) to the topic...Is this still considered spamming? Having one link up on Wikipedia? If so you need to further study what "spamming" is- i'm going to put my link up at the Ghost Section once again- its a related site (check it out for yourself)...If you delete it im going to be complaining about your accusation of me spamming with simply one website.

Thank You.

-Ram-

Actually, there are a lot of sites on the net with "related" information. Related because they in some way deal with ghosts and the paranormal. But the simple fact that these sites deal with ghosts doesn't qualify them for inclusion in the ghost article here on wikipedia. What is important is that the sites we link to are encyclopedic, and preferably of fairly high quality, and where the information is more or less reliable. IMHO - and I mean no offense, mind you - your website doesn't fit these requirements. Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a bulletin board where any individual can advertise for his or her personal homepage. Otherwise, Wikipedia would be flooded with links to sites and webpages that interest only their own makers. So, in order to solve this matter in a more or less democratic manner, I suggest that you add add a suggestion for inclusion of the link to your homepage on the talk page related to the Ghost article. /Magore 19:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I note your warning on User_talk:195.195.24.252

This user has been warned and blocked so many times that it's laughable, thereby requiring extensive time and resources to be used to correct his/her edits. Huddersfield New College is unable to control the access to PC's by it's students, who are free to act as they wish when online. Would it not be better to put an extened block of 6 months on the site. That would then cover the period up and until the next school term, probably taking the vandal out of the equation entirely? 86.3.1.121 14:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have read through the Images and media deletion article and would like Image:Phoenix by marak24.jpg, Image:Hellhound.JPG, and Image:Dragon1.jpg. I think it also qualifies for the speedy deletion as I am the original creator of these pieces and would like them taken down. Could you please help me out? Marak24 21:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed some new warnings on the IP 209.158.179.18. I've already given that IP a final warning for vandalising Underground Railroad several days ago. As the warning says that if the IP user vandalises another page, that user will be blocked. So should we notify the blocking admin to block the IP? Many thanks for warning the vandal. Pls. reply on my talk page. Thank you. --Bruin rrss23 10:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, nothing in the universe can come to a complete stop.Larrio Bizarro 01:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to keep this page on a neutral basis and about the actual topic (the theory & it contxt and history) and prevent the wildly negative (and/or positive) POV bias as evidence by these recent post (using the term crackpot for example...). Can you help?

I have tried, look at the discussion page... I have explained & refuted his claim of Vanity Press, I have put details, and referred him to the discussion page. If you look at [[4]] this started today with no other contributions from him. Read his tone & venomous demeanor???

Honestly I hope it won't have to comenot to this (protection). Perhaps mediation? I doubt this poster ever bothered to check anything. They seem to have a closed minded bias against the very idea. Mediation???

Yes, sorry... Iwas in a hurry... like now! But, it show how dependable Wikipedia is. We thank you for that.

Then yes, I guess so...

I can prove that Stewart Copeland was born in Egypt.

Got your message about my edit to the Apple Computer page, in which I added a link to Apple's conference call transcripts. I'm totally baffled by your removal of this link. Apple's conference calls are genuinely useful content. The company discusses its business, strategy and results on the calls, and answers questions from analysts. Why on earth would you want to remove a link to this from Wikipedia? I don't see a way to include excerpts from the calls themselves, as the most relevant call is the most recent one.

Did you read the conference call transcript before you removed the link to it?

Please reconsider your removal of the link.

Many thanks for your helpful suggestion. Phil Roberts

Good point. Hm...I've never actually seen a vandal like that return after 24 hours...They seem to be made more as throwaway accounts. Are we blocking vandalism only accounts permanently now? --HappyCamper 23:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the note. See you around! --HappyCamper 23:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OH! I completely missed the big picture...this and this - lol...Well, I must sound so dense. Anyway, have a great evening. --HappyCamper 23:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]