User talk:Das Ansehnlisch

Hello, Das Ansehnlisch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, Das Ansehnlisch! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be. Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany | finger on pulse Wikipedia:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board | finger on pulse — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 12:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Paint It, Black, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Postcardsfromfarawaysheetmusic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Postcardsfromfarawaysheetmusic.jpg, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments on User talk:JD554: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I redirected (not deleted) the article because if fails Wikipedia's guidelines on notability as I indicated in my edit summary. JD554 (talk) 06:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NSONGS, there is not point in making the article "better" if it fails the criteria for notability. --JD554 (talk) 12:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be best if you WP:CIVIL as well. --JD554 (talk) 12:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Glassofwater.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:OWN], since you believe that articles that you create are you own. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 12:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Glass of Water (song). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Glass of Water (song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 12:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Strawberry Swing, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable song which doesn't meet WP:NSONGS

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JD554 (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Strawberry Swing, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawberry Swing. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JD554 (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Ode to Deodorant/Brothers + Sisters, you will be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 07:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Postcardsfromfarawaysheetmusic.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. JD554 (talk) 12:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Postcards from Far Away, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postcards from Far Away. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JD554 (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to File:Postcardsfromfarawaysheetmusic.jpg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JD554 (talk) 12:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Struck out per this comment on my talk page. --JD554 (talk) 13:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that I don't not like you as you suggest. The problem is that despite repeated attempts you keep creating or recreating articles which are on non-notable subjects. Wikipedia has notability guidelines which need to be maintained otherwise we would be full of articles on subjects which simply aren't notable. You should make a point of reading WP:N, WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS to see why I've nominated a number of your articles for deletion. If you've taken my actions as a personal attack, I can only apologise, that certainly is not what I intended. However, I maintain the articles I've nominated for deletion should be removed from Wikipedia. I hope this helps clear the air, --JD554 (talk) 13:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the information that you've been trying to create articles for to the Prospekts March article is a good idea. It's worth noting though that anything you add needs to be verified by reliable sources (see WP:V and WP:RS). It's probably also a good idea if you have a look at some of the links that are in the welcome message at the top or this page, paying particular attention to the "Policies and guidelines section". Cheers --JD554 (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...And don't forget that anything you do add is likely to be edited mercilessly by other editors. Don't take it personally though, we all simply want to make the articles better. But it does say at the bottom of the page when you edit anything "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it." --JD554 (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The best place for non-notable songs would be their parent album, a big list of non-notable songs would simply create a non-notable list. However, the songs you've mentioned already have their own articles or are already in better placed articles: Life in Technicolor II, Lost+ and Lovers in Japan (Osaka Sun Mix). --JD554 (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A page like that is likely to be redirected/deleted as well as it will simply contain non-notable songs and therefore not meet the notability criteria itself. It would be best to simply create a section in the Prospekts March article for information regarding the specific songs not released as singles. --JD554 (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, see WP:ALBUMS#Tracklising, that section is simply for the tracklising. Any other information should be in a separate music and/or lyrics section along the lines of Blood Sugar Sex Magik or Thriller (album). Have a look at WP:ALBUMS for how the structure of an album article should look. --JD554 (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather not be a mentor, thanks for asking anyway, but I prefer to get on with editing as much as I can. However, if you would still like someone to mentor you WP:ADOPT is the place to go as there are plenty of willing volunteers to act as mentors there. --JD554 (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use more discretion when considering page moves. Several of your recent moves have been without any discussion, and have resulted in incorrect page placement that other editors have had to repair. One in particular - Pavel Chekov - created a real mess with the multiple moves and redirects. In future, it would be better to first propose moves on the article's talk page. Thank you in advance. --Ckatz^chat_spy 03:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously. Please discuss page moves prior to making them. You have made a series of moves that do not meet the requirements of the Style Guide, and you have not discussed them. It only takes a moment to post on the article's talk page, whereas it takes considerably longer for other editors to clean up afterwards. Thank you. --Ckatz^chat_spy 18:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Glassofwater.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 08:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coldplay whatif.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you created many new Coldplay song articles and take it very personally when someone comments about your edits or makes changes to them. Note that no one "owns" articles per se on Wiki. This is a collaborative project and anything you add to Wikipedia will be edited or changed by other users, especially when it's in violation of existing Wiki policy, in this case WP:NSONGS.

WP:NSONGS is our basic notability guidelines for inclusion of songs in Wikipedia. We aren't a personal blog or Coldplay fan page/wiki, so we don't include independent articles for each track from the band. Again, please do not take ownership of articles and understand that other editors are working in good faith when nominating some of your articles for deletion. --Madchester (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all - don't talk to me like I'm an idiot ... comprende? You aren't clear if these are promo releases or singles. A promo release is a release that is given to radio stations etc to play when an album or dvd is being released, but they aren't available to buy. A full release is one that it is possible to buy. Which are these? --JD554 (talk) 06:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Strawberryswing.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ITSISK.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me if I'm on the wrong page (don't know if you'll look at this or The Chauffeur), but I'm unsure of which to post it. While I am also a fan of those three U2 songs, please note that all three violate Wikipedia's policy on Notability, found at WP:N, hence why they have been made into redirects. Instead of edit-warring over the matter, please discuss the issue on either the respective talk pages or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U2 if you really feel that they are notable enough to warrant their own articles, with reasons to substantiate your claims. Thank you, MelicansMatkin (talk) 00:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to 40 (song), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 07:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Chauffeur, I'm not Russian. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		Shortcut WP:HWY
- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Das Ansehnlisch, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new WikiProjects.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 13:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Das Ansehnlisch, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful: Our main aim is to help improve articles, so if someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice and clarification. Many times we are asked to help rescue articles by people new to our notability and sourcing policies. If the article is not fixable we can help explain why and offer alternatives. Many of these editors are also new to Wikipedia so may see deleting "their" article as "bitey". Encourage civility and maybe even {{welcome}} them if they have only been templated with deletion messages. The Articles for deletion (AfD) discussion is where the concerns regarding each article are brought up and addressed. To be an effective member of the project you need to know how AfD works as well as how to improve articles. Introduction to deletion process gives a good overview and some good advice for newcomers to deletion. Our primary work is improving articles tagged for rescue. On this template you can see a drop-down list of current articles tagged. You can install it on your own page by putting {{ARS/Tagged}}. A more dynamic list with article links and description is on our current articles page. It is highly recommended you watchlist it. If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to the list of translators available. Articles and sources that use non-English languages often need translation for those of us who cannot translate for ourselves. Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 13:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles. We also publish a monthly newsletter that keeps you up to date on project, member, and Eurovision news.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list.
	I hope you accept! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 13:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to 40 (song). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 20:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Glass of Water (song). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MS (Talk|Contributions) 00:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Das Ansehnlisch. Looking through the edits since I unblocked you I can see: A silly attack on a person (calling people "dipshits"), you re-uploading a deleted image (ITSISK.jpg), and some reverting of edits without the courtesy of noting why on either the article's talk page or the reverted editors talk page. Civility to other editors is a requirement here, as is treating the contributions of those editors with the same respect you wish your contributions to be treated with. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent addition to Ian Little has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 10:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The second RfC on sourcing for Eurovision articles has now being running for several weeks, you can view it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#RfC on reliable sources for Eurovision articles. In order to help gauge the spread of opinion and draw conclusions from this discussion a straw poll has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Straw poll. All project members are encouraged to read the RfC thoroughly and then cast their votes as they see fit. Rationales are still encouraged in the main discussion area above the poll, and participants can add appropriate new sources or options to the poll as they wish. Camaron · Christopher · talk 18:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the individual song articles to redirects and moving the content to a single article is a big change and requires consensus. I've reverted the changes. Please do not change it again without seeking and achieving consensus. IMO, I don't think many editors will agree with you. The songs are listed separately on the original album and were recorded mostly separately despite the goal of presenting them seamlessly. Each of the songs is notable in its own right and is worthy of an article. — John Cardinal (talk) 21:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, you can respond here to keep the discussion in one place. I'll see it.

Regarding your comment that it was "presented and played live in the wat of a medley" is not correct. The album cover makes no mention of a medley and while the album mix presents the songs mostly seamlessly, that's not the same thing. Many separate musical works are presented seamlessly via segues. Also, The Beatles never played the song live, and the interpretation of other artists doesn't matter.

In any case, it's a big change and requires consensus. — John Cardinal (talk) 22:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have reverted the Abbey Road medley twice despite being asked to seek consensus. (Perhaps you noticed that it was another editor—unknown to me—who reverted your first revert.) Can't we avoid an edit war on this? — John Cardinal (talk) 03:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote on my talk page that "We can keep the page and delete it if it's absolutley necessary." I think that's a bad idea: we'd have to keep the content in sync across the many pages.

One issue with your proposed change is where to have a wider discussion. I'm not sure that many people would see the discussion if it were on Talk:Abbey Road medley. Using a talk page for one of the songs might be OK, or perhaps the album's talk page.What do you think? — John Cardinal (talk) 15:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Hammersmith82.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once again I've had to come along and add the missing licensing information and fair use rationale from an image you've uploaded. What exactly is it that you are struggling to understand from all the above notices/warnings and links? --JD554 (talk) 07:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want to read the page about how you should upload pictures, then don't upload pictures. Any further disruptive uploads by will be treated as disruptive editing and may lead to you being blocked. I would strongly suggest that you do read how to upload files properly and that you use the WP:UPLOAD tool to help you do so correctly. --JD554 (talk) 13:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Strawberry Swing, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. JD554 (talk) 14:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Fire (U2 song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The name of the song is still "Fire," regardless of the name the single was given in one country. --McMillin24 _contribs^talk 01:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter

Project Talk Page The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue XII - July 2009 Project News The RfC on article sourcing was closed by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs) as an uninvolved editor. The decisions were for each source: ESCToday: Reliable ESCKaz: Semi-reliable ESCTime: Not reliable Oikotimes: No consensus More details on the decision as well as the full RfC can be found on the project talk page. The decisions made in the RfC will likely impact on future drafts of the article guidelines. Please note that further use of Oikotimes and ESCTime is discouraged and existing uses should be replaced with reliable sources. If no other source exists for the information, leave the current source for the time being. Due to a new naming convention relating to the use of the term "FYR Macedonia", the Republic of Macedonia should be referred to as "Macedonia" in Eurovision articles. Mention of the country's participation in the Contest under the name "FYR Macedonia" should be written in the lead of articles such as Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest, though it is not necessary to express this fact in the general Contest articles. Project News Luara Hayrapetyan will represent Armenia in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2009 with the song "Barcelona" following her win at the 11 July national final. Belarusian broadcaster ONT will be in charge of the country's participation in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010, taking over the task from BTRC. Two months after the 2009 Contest ended, the EBU revealed the full jury and televoting results for each country on its website. The results showed that Norway was the winner of both the jury and the televoting, while many placings would have changed had no jury voting taken place. Georgia announced its return to the Contest, while the Czech Republic will withdraw from the 2010 Contest. STV announced plans for Slovakia's participation in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010, with songs submitted for the national final now allowed to include choruses in English. Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here! Page Milestones A fact from Melodifestivalen 2009 was featured in the did you know section of the Main Page. Eurovision Song Contest is in the middle of a featured article review in an attempt for it to retain its featured article status. Norway and Portugal in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 have been renominated as Good Articles and are awaiting reviews. From the Members Welcome to the twelfth edition of the WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter! It has been a very slow couple of months in terms of Eurovision news since the passing of the 2009 Contest, however, it has been a very busy time for guidelines and policies affecting our project. Landmark decisions have been made regarding our use of sources and even how we are to refer to Macedonia. In addition, several of our Good Articles have been delisted as part of a task force charged with maintaining the quality of Wikipedia's Good Articles. With there being less information to add and therefore less to do for some, we need to focus on the upkeep and quality of our project's articles and getting those inactive members active once again. We can do this by making sure all new guidelines and naming policies are adhered to and by working to move articles up the quality scale. We are a WikiProject and we all work towards a similar goal. Introduce yourself to your fellow members and get active! Happy editing, Grk1011/Stephen (talk). Member News The project currently has 75 members. Want to invite new members? Place our invitation template on the talk page of anyone you would like to invite to our project. New Members We would like to welcome the new member who joined in July. (by date joined) Das Ansehnlisch (talk · contribs) Jackie-thai (talk · contribs) Baller449 (talk · contribs) Rak-Tai (talk · contribs)

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Glass of Water. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JD554 (talk) 13:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Glass of Water. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. JD554 (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Das! Even though the page is now fully protected from editing, per a discussion here, the content of the non-redirected version of the article has been copied into User:Dylan620/Sandbox/What If (Coldplay song). You are welcome to help me out if you wish! Best, Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 15:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CantStopFeeling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did to The Beatles (album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Radiopathy •talk• 00:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Coldplay. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, or you may be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 08:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even tho USSR and Helter Skelter appear on the "White Album" -- the singles (*BOTH SIDES) are from the Rock N Roll Music album. It's not correct to put them in the White Album.

Actually, yes it is correct to put them in White Album, because they were released as singles to promote RNRM, but the songs are from the White Album.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 12:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually, they were used to promote the RNRM album and that's where they belong. Their release in this configuration, eight years on, had nothing to do with the "White Album", except for it being the source for the music. Radiopathy •talk• 23:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to The Beatles (album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Radiopathy •talk• 00:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Beatles (album). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Radiopathy •talk• 00:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After repeated warnings about moving pages without discussion/against consensus, you made this edit, moving an article so that it's title is spelt incorrectly. Radiopathy •talk• 15:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 72 hours for not heeding all the warnings above. It was clear that the page moves you were performing were not appreciated, and you refused to stop. Enigma^msg 16:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Radiopathy •talk• 02:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The convention is to list the A-side using the A-side parameter. Please follow it. Changing to something else just means a lot of work for other editors. — John Cardinal (talk) 01:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...and at least discuss. The U2 redirects are there for a reason. They are non-notable songs for wikipedia as determined at WP:MUSIC. PLease cease reverting the good faith work of others. At least explain why these songs are notable and how, as you suggest, they should be "edited". thanks --Merbabu (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have made no attempt to discuss, but have continued reverting people's work. PLease read WP:NSONGS. --Merbabu (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 21:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Merbabu, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Read WP:CIVIL & WP:AGF, comments only on content. Dave1185 (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop - you cannot get your version of an article by edit warring. You need to discuss and get consensus FIRST. You have had a number of people now warn you and point out the problem with your editing, and you have been blocked. Please don't ignore further warnings. --Merbabu (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter

Project Talk Page The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue XIII - August 2009 Project News There has been some discussion on if a monthly newsletter is viable. The current result is not clear, though it appears for the time being months will simply be skipped as necessary when project activity is low. There has been a heated debate on how to deal with criticism and controversy in Eurovision Song Contest article, with a proposal made to re-organise articles to avoid dedicated "controversy" and "criticism" sections in order to have maximum neutral point of view policy compliance. As a result of continued coverage on Azerbaijan-Armenia relations and its impact on the Eurovision Song Contest a new dedicated article on the issue has been created at Armenia–Azerbaijan relations in the Eurovision Song Contest. Discussion about the article name occurred at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2010#Suggestion on azerbaijan-armenia conflict. Eurovision News 23 countries have confirmed their participation in the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest. This includes the confirmed return of Georgia, and the confirmed withdrawal of the Czech Republic. The RTL Group has declared that they are seriously considering a return of Luxembourg to the Eurovision Song Contest for 2010. Azerbaijan's participation in the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest has been put in doubt following controversial actions which are believed to have occurred after the 2009 Contest. Azerbaijan has denied that any questioning of individuals over voting in the contest has occurred. A return of the orchestra has been proposed for the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest with Jan Fredrik Heyerdahl of the Norwegian Radio Orchestra declaring interest in participating. Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here! Page Milestones Portugal in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 has been declined GA status due to sourcing, with the issue of reliable sourcing being brought up once again in the discussion. Norway in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 has been nominated for GA status but is on hold with many improvements still required for GA status. Eurovision Song Contest has been demoted to B-class from FA due to various issues highlighted in a long discussion. From the Members Welcome to the thirteenth edition of the WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter! August 2009 will not be remembered as a good month for WikiProject Eurovision. The number of this newsletter might have something to do with it, other possible explanations include circumstances, time of year, and even just coincidence. In any case we have had no new members and no further GA or FA article promotions. The demotion of Eurovision Song Contest, probably the most important article on the project, was a historic blow. Reasons for this and other demotions in recent months include an inflation of article standards, article deterioration through inappropriate edits, and possibly inappropriate promotions in some cases. We should remember however that despite these demotions we still have 2 FAs, 9 GAs, and 41 B-class articles, as well as 2 Featured Lists. This is a big achievement for a project with only 75 members, a small amount compared to other projects. To compare WikiProject Schools has 292 members with no newsletter, and WikiProject Video games has a massive 1,298 members with only a quarterly newsletter. This project will likely be disadvantaged for a long time to come with limited membership and fluctuating activity during the year, but it will grow out of this blip. Happy editing, Camaron · Christopher · talk Member News The project currently has 75 members. Want to invite new members? Place our invitation template on the talk page of anyone you would like to invite to our project. No new members joined the project in the month of August.

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter how "great" a song is; to Wikipedia, it's immaterial. The notability guideline for music notes that, in the case of songs, "most..do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect". Songs that have charted, primarily singles, or songs that have been covered several times by a variety of artists, can (but are not always) seen as being notable enough for their own article. The only other reason a song may qualify for its own article is when there is enough verified information for a detailed article to be created. This last criterion is the main difference between articles such "A Sort of Homecoming (song)" and "White as Snow (song)". One has a lot of detailed information; the other doesn't.

Believe me, I've searched for information on just about every U2 song. I've trawled the net, and every U2-related book that I own. But there just isn't any real information available for them. The songs that I redirected were primarily composed of the number of times that the band played each song. And that just isn't what it takes to make an article. (By the way, please forgive me for the lateness of my response; I've been without any internet access for a week due to a change of location). MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell us which Wikipedia policy you are trying to get the rest of us to adhere to regarding the addition of both sides of a single only if said single was a double A-side release. In the meantime, please stop removing the B-sides from music articles on Wikipedia. Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 23:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you replacing sleeve images for singles by The Beatles? The images already there are fine. Your images are lower quality and do not have adequate free-use rationales. I have reverted your changes. — John Cardinal (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The ones I'm putting are the original British sleeves, and, uh, let's see, the beatles are a BRITISH band!--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 13:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Your scans are not good, you have not provided adequate free-use rationales, etc. There is no rule that a British band must use british sleeves, and your sleeves are not documented as such. You are doing a sloppy job. — John Cardinal (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What don't you understand? — John Cardinal (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a formal request from me to you asking you to seek consensus for swapping out the images. I have concerns about your images as described above (quality, free-use rationale) and your only motivation is that The Beatles were British. There is no rule that British sleeve images must be used for a British band. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. I have an idea--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please seek consensus. Specifying alternate images won't stand up to free-use rules. See the messages below about deleting images? That's what will happen to the ones your replacing, and that's why I am asking you to stop and seek consensus before images are deleted. You have the replacements and so a delay to use them won't be an issue. We may not be able to easily recreate any existing image that gets deleted and there's extra work stopping the file deletion process. You are making extra work and there's no need for it. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't you see what I did after I told you I had an idea? that's fine isn't it?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not fine. Multiple images will not suffice; the free-use people will complain and they'll be right. I have repeatedly asked you to seek consensus and you are not doing that. I am reporting you as a vandal. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get what your saying. How is what I'm doing not alright!?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not right

• because multiple images for a single article (your latest solution) will fail free-use guidelines unless there is some important reason why both images are necessary (there isn't).
• because of the problems with the images.
• because I asked you to seek consensus. That means you have to go to the talk page of the image or the article(s) where it is used and propose a change.
• Lastly, because the images you uploaded do not have adequate fair-use rationales so they will probably be deleted.

— John Cardinal (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:BeatlesIFeelFine.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiopathy •talk• 14:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:BeatlesGetBack.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiopathy •talk• 14:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Heyjude.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiopathy •talk• 14:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Iwanttoholdyourhand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiopathy •talk• 14:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Paperbackwriter.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiopathy •talk• 14:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Daytripper.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiopathy •talk• 14:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for disruptive editing - page moves without consensus, and uploading images without rationales. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended per user's abusive post here. Six blocks since June 2009 indicate a lack of respect for the community's guiding principles. User needs to thoroughly review these principles, and is advised to use the block period to ask any appropriate questions in order to ensure they fully understand them. --Ckatz^chat_spy 18:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das Ansehnlisch, it is apparent from this post and this reply that you are using the IP 99.14.139.38 to access Wikipedia during a block. This is absolutely unacceptable behaviour per the rules of conduct governing use of the site. Note that, although your account is blocked from editing, you still have access to your talk page. As such, you could easily have left the message for Coldplay Expert here instead of using an IP to avoid the block. If you had only left a note, I might have been inclined to overlook the incident and leave you with a warning. However, you have repeatedly used the IP address to edit during your block. Given your extensive block history, I feel there is no option but to reset your block to the original length as of today, and to block the IP as well. If you have any comment on this matter, or if you have some alternate explanation for the events I've described, please do so here or on the IP's talk page. --Ckatz^chat_spy 00:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be blocked until NOVEMBER 7TH! That's 12 day's before my birthday! I am doing Wikipedia good if you realise it or not. Let's make a deal here, somehow.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das Ansehnlisch,

I am sure you are angry right now and I don't want to add to it but I will risk that to offer some advice and encouragement. I hope you will take the time to read this and give it some thought.

I think you have something to add to Wikipedia and it will be a shame if you continue along the path you've been on. Before you can contribute in a useful way, you will have to accept that WP is a collaborative editing environment where multiple editors combine to create and modify articles.

If you are passionate about a topic, you may not like having other people criticize your contributions, revert them, etc. I know I don't. Unfortunately, it's inevitable: whenever there are two or more people involved, disagreements are going to happen. When they do, it's critical to stay civil, stop editing, and try to work things out. That means editors should propose and discuss alternatives, apply any relevant Wikipedia policies or guidelines, etc. If someone with a strong opinion ignores the process—and the other editors—the situation will get worse before it gets better.

In my opinion, the most important thing for you is to avoid edit wars. If someone disagrees with one of your edits and reverts it, avoid the temptation to revert it back. If you feel strongly that your edit improves the article, edit the appropriate talk page—usually, the article's talk page—and explain why you think your edit improves the article. If you don't do that, and instead you redo whatever you did in the first place, you put the other editor on the defensive and hurt your chances of persuading anyone that your edit improves the article.

If you promise to try and become a better collaborator, I suspect that an admin will unblock you before the end of your current month-long block. Once you can edit again you'll probably discover (again) that collaboration isn't easy. Over time, however, you will see that some of your changes will be accepted after they have been contested because you followed the process and convinced other editors that your edit improved the encyclopedia.

— John Cardinal (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks John--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Das its been a while since we talked and I just wanted to say that I know how it feels to be blocked. (I was for a day because I defended a friend of mine, its a long story) Anyway I just wanted to say that I belive that you have the potential to become a very good editor and I just wanted to say that If you try to discuss your opinions others may agree with you and eventually you may get your way. Anyway I know how lonely it is being blocked and haveing other people ignoring you while you are so if you want, I can talk to you.--Coldplay Expert 00:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment and im not sure about GHC, check the AN/I--Coldplay Expert 00:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me translate that in German: Das Ansehnlisch,

Ich bin sicher, Sie sind jetzt böse, und ich möchte nicht, um ihn hinzuzufügen, aber ich werde die Gefahr, dass einige Ratschläge und Unterstützung zu bieten. Ich hoffe, Sie nehmen uns die Zeit zu lesen und geben es einige Überlegungen.

Ich glaube, Sie haben etwas dazu zu Wikipedia, und es wird eine Schande, wenn Sie auf dem Weg, die Sie auf sich fortsetzen. Bevor Sie in einer sinnvollen Weise dazu beitragen können, müssen Sie akzeptieren, dass WP eine kollaborative Umgebung, in der Bearbeitung von mehreren Editoren kombinieren, zum Erstellen und Ändern Artikeln ist.

Wenn Sie über ein Thema leidenschaftlich sind, können Sie nicht gerne mit anderen Menschen zu kritisieren Ihre Beiträge, kehren sie, usw. Ich weiß, dass ich nicht. Leider ist es unvermeidlich, wenn es zwei oder mehr Personen beteiligt sind, Meinungsverschiedenheiten passieren wird. Wenn sie es tun, sie ist entscheidend für Aufenthalt Zivil-, Stop-Bearbeitung und versuchen, Dinge zu erarbeiten. Das bedeutet, dass Redakteure vorschlagen sollte, und über Alternativen, gelten alle relevanten Wikipedia-Strategien oder Leitlinien, etc. Wenn jemand mit einer starken Meinung ignoriert die Prozess-und den anderen Editoren, die Lage wird sich verschlechtern, bevor es besser wird.

Meiner Meinung nach das Wichtigste für Sie ist zu bearbeiten Kriege zu vermeiden. Wenn jemand nicht einverstanden ist mit einem von Ihren Änderungen und kehrt, vermeiden Sie der Versuchung, es wieder zurück. Wenn Sie das Gefühl, dass Ihr stark verbessert den Artikel bearbeiten, bearbeiten Sie die entsprechende Seite zu sprechen, meist, den Artikel zu sprechen Seite und erklären, warum Sie denken, dass Ihr den Artikel bearbeiten verbessert. Wenn Sie das nicht selbst tun, und stattdessen wiederholen, was Sie in erster Linie haben Sie die anderen Editor in die Defensive gedrängt und verletzt Ihre Chancen zu überzeugen, dass jemand Ihre Bearbeiten verbessert die Artikel.

Wenn Sie versuchen, Versprechen und ein besserer Mitarbeiter, vermute ich, dass ein Administrator Ihnen vor Ende des aktuellen Monats-langer Block frei machen. Sobald Sie bearbeiten können, werden Sie wahrscheinlich wieder zu entdecken (wieder), dass die Zusammenarbeit ist nicht einfach. Im Laufe der Zeit aber werden Sie feststellen, dass einige Ihrer Änderungen akzeptiert werden, nachdem sie bestritten haben, weil Sie den Prozess und die anderen Editoren davon überzeugt, dass Ihr verbessert Bearbeiten der Enzyklopädie befolgt worden sein

There. Schönes Tages,----_{Boeing7107isdelicious|Sprich mit meine Piloten} 05:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You got a long string of disruptive contributions there. Please, be aware of these. Anyways, you were asking if User:Mikhailov Kusserow is Russian, yes he is. And apparently he's making friends with Indonesians.--One moment, Reciever | Thank you for your instructions. 13:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter

Project Talk Page The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue XIV - September and October 2009 Project News This is the first edition of the WikiProject Eurovision newsletter in a bimonthly format. Following a discussion on the project talk page this may now become the regular format for the newsletter during the months that the project is less active. Eurovision articles are being repeatedly targeted by sock puppets of banned user Xtinadbest (talk · contribs), who is not allowed to edit Wikipedia. The most effective way of tackling this disruption is to have all regular Eurovision article editors looking out for sock puppets. Editors should report any suspected sock puppets sighted to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, more history can be found at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xtinadbest/Archive. A proposal was made to change Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) to discourage the use of numeric dates, primarily YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. 2009-08-12 for 12 August 2009), in footnotes as at present it is only discouraged in the main article body. The proposal now seems unlikely to pass due to large levels of opposition, though it could have had a large impact on this project as the date format YYYY-MM-DD is frequently used in Eurovision for reference publication and access dates. Further discussion can be found on the project talk page. Eurovision News 31 countries have confirmed their participation in the 2010 Contest. ESCToday has suggested that the Eurovision Song Contest may be entering a crisis due to the possibility of a large drop in the number of participants next year with the ongoing international recession hitting the budgets of many broadcasters in Europe. Luxembourg and Monaco have both ruled out a return to the Eurovision Song Contest for 2010. A decision by San Marino on if to return or not has not yet been made. Hungary declared it is pulling out of the Eurovision Song Contest due to the financial difficulties of the national broadcaster Magyar Televízió (MTV). National selection details for the 2010 Contest are now available for sixteen countries. Despite the contest being over six months away, Bulgaria has already announced that the artist that will represent the country in 2010 will be Miroslav Kostadinov (who is frequently referred to as Miro). It has been announced that the voting system used for the Eurovision Song Contest semi-finals will change in 2010. The previous system was introduced in 2008 along with the first use of two semi-finals; it involved nine out of ten final places per semi-final being determined exclusively by televote, with the tenth place being determined by juries. This will be replaced by a more balanced 50% jury voting, 50% televoting system. The 2009 Junior Eurovision Song Contest is scheduled to occur next month on 21 November. 13 countries are participating in the contest, while three (Bulgaria, Greece, and Lithuania) are withdrawing. Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here! Page Milestones Blaxy Girls was nominated for deletion and kept. Javine Hylton was also nominated for GA status but was quickly failed due to a large number of concerns. The nominator, Judo112 (talk · contribs), was later found to be a sock puppet of a previously blocked user. Norway in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 was nominated for GA status and was placed on hold for almost a month. The GA nomination has now failed due to some remaining issues. From the Members Welcome to the fourteenth edition of the WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter! There have been quite a few updates to the 2010 Contest article since 1 September. Nine countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, Ireland, Macedonia, Malta, Poland, Serbia, and Slovenia) have confirmed their participation, and the article in general has seen many changes. Sadly, whilst some editors have been working hard to provide reliable sources, others have been less thorough and the article has had to be semi-protected again to prevent further disruption. This is a shame, as ideally anyone should be able to edit; however, the talk page is always available to bring new information to light. The participating countries' section has also been updated to allow the inclusion of information about the language, artist and song (with an English translation as appropriate), although to date this is very much a work in progress. As news comes in, we look forward to enriching this section in the coming months—backed-up of course with sources! No new country-specific articles have been written these past two months. If you want to add more detailed information about a country's participation in the 2010 Contest, this is the ideal way to do it, and they are very much appreciated by our readers. Happy editing, Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (Talk) Member News The project currently has 77 members, with a loss of one member and a gain of three others in September and October. Want to invite new members? Place our invitation template on the talk page of anyone you would like to invite to our project. New Members We would like to welcome the new members who joined in September and October (by date joined): BalticPat22 (talk · contribs) Oskyplop (talk · contribs) Hollac16 (talk · contribs)

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should be informed that the songs "Let it Be" and "Get Back" on the Let it Be album are different mixes compared to the versions released as singles. Therefore, the songs are NOT included in the Let it Be album in the single mixes. That's why they are not listed as singles. On CD, the single mixes are available on the Past Masters compilation. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, but still the were songs that were released as singles and appeared on the album, therefore, no matter what mix appeared on the album, should be listed as a single from the album.

Note: User did not sign, but above is from Das Ansehnlisch (talk)

I see you are back from your block and you have repeated the same edits that got you blocked. All your edits have been reverted; they go against policy, guidelines, and consensus. For situations where a song was released long after its release as a single, which happened multiple times with The Beatles, editors have agreed that the song's initial release should be an {{Infobox song}} entry: the initial release is supposed to be in the infobox. In many cases, the single release has been given its own infobox to clearly indicate those release dates, etc. Multiple editors have accepted that solution. You can try to change consensus, but you should stop trying to force it by edit warring. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MY GOD JON CARDINAL THEYR FINe HOW I EDITED THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! REVERT THEM BACK TO MY EDITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 15:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das Ansehnlisch, multiple editors have reverted your edits. The editors in question have thousands of edits to Wikipedia. That does not mean they have some special privilege, but it does mean they are experienced. When such editors revert your edits, you should reconsider your position. In this case, when you made the same type of edits (in some cases, the same edits) in the past you were blocked multiple times by neutral admins. What do you expect to happen this time? Using messages in all caps is typically interpreted by other editors as shouting, and I can assure you that shouting at me (or other editors) won't help your case. There are three ways to proceed:

1. Describe why you think the singles should be handled differently on the talk page of a single song article and see what other editors think, including why they agree or disagree.
2. Accept that the handling of songs/singles, etc., is not done the way you want it and focus your efforts elsewhere.
3. Keep repeating the edits.

If you choose the last option, you'll probably wind up blocked for a long time, perhaps indefinitely. Frankly, your pattern of behavior indicates that your heading in that direction. — John Cardinal (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remember Das you have to be calm. Keeping cool may mean that your edits will remain. After all this is an all voluntary program nothing to get all worked up about. Anyway good luck.--Coldplay Expert 18:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja. Bitte nicht zu laut schreien.----_{Boeing7107isdelicious|Sprich mit meine Piloten} 06:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das Ansehnlisch. You have new messages at 7107delicious's talk page.
Message added 04:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--_{Boeing7107isdelicious|Sprich mit meine Piloten} 04:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das Ansehnlisch,

Ich bin sicher, dass Sie immer noch sehr wütend auf den Moment, aber ich bin auch sicher, als Sie Ihre Probleme selbst beheben können. Sie haben noch die Wahl:

1.Behalten Ihre störende Beiträge, und stellen Sie diese Hinweise in Ihrem Vortrag Seite verschwinden

2.Fortfahren zur Ihre Flammen auf andere und nutzen Sie blockiert (Again).

Sie wissen, sollten Sie vergessen, die letzte Option. Sie können auch auf unbestimmte Zeit von der Bearbeitung von Wikipedia blockiert werden, sollten Sie erscheinen weiterhin die Wikipedia nicht mutwillig zerstören.----_{Boeing7107isdelicious|Sprich mit meine Piloten} 04:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, BTW, I forgot to mention that Mikhailov Kusserow (talk · contribs) may have left Wikipedia, so I decided to ask you a question. Are you from Germany? And yes, again, I am from Indonesia and as I am from an Indonesian descent, I am an Indonesian, and I am proud of being one.----_{Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN} 10:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I am German. I'm also Irish, Lebanese, and English--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can you be in three nationalities at once? Do you have a UK, Ireland and Lebanon passport?----_{Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN} 06:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das Ansehnlisch, you are aware that this has been through a (brief) deletion discussion Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_June_21#File:ITSISK.jpg and has now been deleted three times. If you want to contest the deletion you need to raise this at deletion review rather than simply re-uploading and re-adding the same image - Peripitus (Talk) 21:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das Ansehnlisch; I see that you wish to be adopted. Just so I can have a confirmation, please state below whether you accept or reject. If you accept, I will immediately send you some info about my program. Cheers! --Twilight Helryx 16:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accept!, though I would like to be Coldplay Expert's adoptee, too.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! I'll be posting the info in a second. And don't worry, you can always get a second Adopter (and as many as you like) so you can still apply for Coldplay as soon as he's available. ;)--Twilight Helryx 02:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting me as your Adopter; I hope that my tutelage will benefit you and help you work to the best of your abilities. To get started, please tell me which of the following courses you would like to take:

1. Gnome Work: Choose this if you wish to primarily contribute by making small edits.
2. Vandal Fighting: Choose this to learn how to deal with vandals more efficiently.
3. Communication: Choose this to learn how to handle edit disputes, deal with biting editors, keep cool when the editing gets hot, and many others.
4. Articles: Choose this to learn what makes a good article, when and how to create an article, and how to edit one more efficiently.
5. Other: Choose this if the area you want me to help you with is not listed here. If you do choose this, please specify exactly what you want me to teach.

Once you've completed the course(s), I will consider you graduated. But if you think you need help in another area, you may choose to postpone your graduation. I hope that my courses will be useful and better prepare you for whatever may come at you on Wikipedia. Cheers!--Twilight Helryx 02:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: two infoboxes. Multiple editors have approved of that method for the Beatle singles that were released eight or ten years after their original release as album tracks. Specifically, "Back in the U.S.S.R." was notable as a song released on The Beatles long before the single release. The infobox should cover the original release, including release dates, etc., it confuses matters to put the much-later single release in the same box. The extra infobox does not harm and keeps the single release details cleanly separated from the original release. — John Cardinal (talk) 02:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, have you joined this WikiProject? If not, well I would like to give you this invitation to you. Since you harbour a distinctive love for music, even on Wikipedia, I would suggest you on fixing Indonesian band articles and create some articles about Indonesian songs. - _{Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN} 14:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you've been on for while but I don't have a response for my last message. May I ask if you still wish to have my lessons?--Twilight Helryx 01:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to! (seriously)--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! The list of courses is sitting a couple sections up and is titled "Training Program". Please let me know which course(s) you would like to take.--Twilight Helryx 02:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! but how do I access the page?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 02:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't any (yet). You're going to have to tell me which one(s) you want to take so I can start the pages. ;)--Twilight Helryx 02:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What ones are there to take?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you didn't see it in the section? o.o" Guess that explains why I didn't get a response. Ah, well. Here's the list again:

Thank you for accepting me as your Adopter; I hope that my tutelage will benefit you and help you work to the best of your abilities. To get started, please tell me which of the following courses you would like to take:

1. Gnome Work: Choose this if you wish to primarily contribute by making small edits.
2. Vandal Fighting: Choose this to learn how to deal with vandals more efficiently.
3. Communication: Choose this to learn how to handle edit disputes, deal with biting editors, keep cool when the editing gets hot, and many others.
4. Articles: Choose this to learn what makes a good article, when and how to create an article, and how to edit one more efficiently.
5. Other: Choose this if the area you want me to help you with is not listed here. If you do choose this, please specify exactly what you want me to teach.

Once you've completed the course(s), I will consider you graduated. But if you think you need help in another area, you may choose to postpone your graduation. I hope that my courses will be useful and better prepare you for whatever may come at you on Wikipedia. Cheers!--Twilight Helryx 02:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For now I'll take: Vandal Fighting, Communication and Articles!--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 02:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das Ansehnlisch. You have new messages at User:Twilight Helryx/Training/Das Ansehnlisch/Lesson01.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your first lesson, Vandal Fighting, is ready. Go check it out and have fun!

To more easily access you lessons in the future, you can go to this page. Cheers!--Twilight Helryx 21:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, meine Freunde! 7107Lecker ^{Tischgespräch, außerdem...} 03:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist nicht zu schwer! All you need to do is read, and that's it! You'll understand. I've tried TW as a vandal fighting tool myself, but I use them spraingly. Remember to be careful with the tools, though. Very sensitive. 7107Lecker ^{Tischgespräch, außerdem...} 03:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make edits like this. You changed cited material such that it no longer agrees with the cited source and you did not add a separate source to support the change. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit to "Come Together". You changed cited material in a Personnel section again, with no edit comment and no source. — John Cardinal (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube is not a reliable source, and source citations are not put in the header of a section. There are existing sources there already.

You are falling into your past pattern of disruptive editing and it's getting tedious to keep undoing about 90% of your edits. I will report you as a vandal if you keep it up. — John Cardinal (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even watch the link video? if you did, tell me how using the original master tapes to confirm instruments used by the four is not a reliable source--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 20:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need a verifiable citation to back up disputed information. Otherwise the disputed material is deleted. That's why there are reference footnotes in articles which show where the sources can be found. Steelbeard1 (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 01:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop editing articles until you understand that encyclopedic content must be verifiable and thus supported by reliable sources.

If you listen to something on Youtube or on a CD or wherever, you can't be sure who is playing, and you can't be sure it's even the instrument you think it is, and it's WP:OR, which is not allowed on WP. Meanwhile, reliable sources (Lewisohn, MacDonald, etc.) have listened to tapes and reviewed studio documentation and made assertions about what instrument is used and who played it. You need a reliable source—not your own ears—to counter the current sources and you haven't produced any. — John Cardinal (talk) 01:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das! Hows it going? I hope that your doing ok with your adoption!--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 01:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything's going great! I hope you had a very merry christmas!--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting Band on the Run from the "Helen Wheels" infobox. The US version of the album was released before the UK version, and the US version included "Helen Wheels". That more than justifies the "from Band on the Run" infobox entry. — John Cardinal (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the single was released before the album, and it was against Paul's wishes for it to be on the album. Besides, for stuff like this we go by official UK release.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, the release date of the single was close to the release date of the album and the single was used to promote the album. Second, McCartney agreed to the inclusion on the US album. He was reluctant, but he relented. Third, WP editors have not agreed that the UK releases are "official" for McCartney's solo albums.

Lastly, but most importantly, you changed long-standing article text. It was reverted. Wiki policies state that if your change is reverted, you should take the matter to the article's talk page. You have not done that. That's your standard operating procedure; you refuse to collaborate. If I discuss this matter with any of the admins who have blocked you before, they will block you again, and it won't be a short block; by convention, it should be longer than your last block. I'm changing it back; if you revert, be prepared to be blocked. — John Cardinal (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Come Together, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You changed cited material without amending the source citation, you did not provide a source for the modification, and the edit was a repeat of a prior edit that had been reverted for the same reasons. John Cardinal (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You responded on my talk page, and so I have added my comments there. — John Cardinal (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das Ansehnlisch! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 337 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Ian Little - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter

Project Talk Page The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue XV - November and December 2009 Project News Happy Christmas and new year from WikiProject Eurovision. This is the second edition of the newsletter to be in a bimonthly format. This will probably continue at least up until the next Eurovision Song Contest when the project is more active. Editors are reminded that some articles covered WikiProject Eurovision are subject to the biographies of living persons policy. This does not just include biography articles such as Alexander Rybak, but any article with material related to living persons. Such information is highly sensitive, and unsourced or poorly sourced material about living persons must be removed immediately. Material which may seen trivial to editors, such as a false claim of participation in a contest, can potentially be highly sensitive to the living persons involved. Eurovision articles on this project have been repeatedly subject to a form of sneaky vandalism. This involves unregistered users adding false information to articles such as Eurovision Song Contest 2010 (while unprotected). These false claims are then made to look legitimate through the use of "fake references" with false titles and links, example. Cuchufleta (talk · contribs) was blocked indefinitely for creating multiple hoax articles with the same editing technique. Editors are advised to look out for further disruption of this kind, as it seems to be originating from a determined individial or an organised group. More information can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#User:Cuchufleta. Eurovision News The EBU released their participants list for the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest on 31 December 2009. 39 countries will take part. Five of these qualify directly to the final, with the 34 remaining countries each competing in one of two semi-finals (seventeen per semi-final). Five countries have declared they will be withdrawing from the contest in 2010. The Czech Republic are withdrawing due to three semi-final failures and a lack of interest from Czech viewers. Andorra, Hungary, Lithuania, and Montenegro have all declared they are withdrawing for financial reasons. Georgia is the only country that has declared it will be returning to the contest. No debuts are planned either with Liechtenstein's only broadcaster 1FLTV having ruled out joining the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) for December 2009. This made a debut by the country for the 2010 Contest no longer possible. Despite the 2010 Contest being many months away countries are now actively declaring which artists and songs will be representing them at the contest. A table for this can be found at Eurovision Song Contest 2010#Participants. Nearly all of the declared participants now have dedicated entry articles. The Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2009 was held on 21 November 2009 and was won by Ralf Mackenbach of the Netherlands with the song "Click Clack". Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here! Page Milestones MelodyVision Song Contest and related articles have been deleted following a discussion at Articles for deletion (AfD). The article on Sakis Rouvas received a peer review which is now archived. The Samantha Womack article was not moved following a discussion. A fact from Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010 appeared on the Main Page during 26 December 2009. From the Members Welcome to the fifteenth edition of the WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter! Another decade has past for the Eurovision Song Contest. The naughties will probably be remembered as a decade of both success and controversy for the contest. Televoting reached its peak in the early 2000s. This gave the contest a more democratic edge, but by 2008 it was widely believed to have made Eurovision resemble a political and geographic football match rather than a song contest. The EBU took action in 2009 by reducing televoting to having only a 50% weighting in the results of each contest. Many new countries have joined the contest in the last decade, bringing the number of participants to a new high. Among this some countries withdrew while others returned, though one of the major missing countries, Italy, did not make a return as was hoped by many. There was not a shortage of controversy either. Two participants went to war, and the buzz over the planned participation of Kosovo put Eurovision in the middle of a political storm. One also cannot forget that this decade saw the introduction of two spin-off contests - the Junior Eurovision Song Contest and the Eurovision Dance Contest. It is still not fully clear on how these fit into this project, perhaps we will work that out during the tens. Happy editing in a new year and decade, Camaron · Christopher · talk Member News The project currently has 80 members, with three joining during November and December. Want to invite new members? Place our invitation template on the talk page of anyone you would like to invite to our project. New Members We would like to welcome the new members who joined in November and December (by date joined): Chio21 (talk · contribs) Draggleduck (talk · contribs) Back4goode (talk · contribs)

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by xenobot 14:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This banned user is now editing from 216.100.93.130 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). — John Cardinal (talk) 19:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The editor is indef blocked, John, not banned. See my talkpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, Less. Thanks. — John Cardinal (talk) 22:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited from that. I haven't edited since last week--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it isn't you, then it is someone following a very similar pattern as your edits. I will look into this more. — John Cardinal (talk) 01:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I have to eat my words; the IP vandal appears to be a different person. I apologize, Das, the edits were very similar to many of yours. — John Cardinal (talk) 02:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, I'm sorry too--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can't even edit my own sandbox! How is Beatles Bible not a reliable source? They list plenty of sources and know about the personnel of a song from it's master tracks, ect. You can't just rely on books, as many are incorrect.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps someone can mentor Das so he can fully understand the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. His adopter, Twilight Helryx is on a break.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 00:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, I'm on half break (I'm too busy to get active editing, but not so when it comes to anyone who needs help from me). =P Well Das, as I mentioned on your first lesson page, I'll tell you what you should do to complete it when you give me the word. But, if you're having some trouble elsewhere, please do let me know and I'll help you as soon as I can. Cheers!--Twilight Helryx 17:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ai! Sorry, I was so rushed in reading and writing that I didn't notice that your block's indefinite. o.o" Have you appealed it yet? Because, I think what you need is some serious coaching. I'm so sorry that I wasn't there for you when you needed me. :'( --Twilight Helryx 05:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Das Ansehnlisch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The Beatles Bible is a site that uses reliable resouces for it's information. I am pretty sure they know more about the songs than Ian McDonald does, and you cannot always trust a book.

Decline reason:

If I take your point correctly, you are saying that information you got from some random Beatles fansite is better than information in a researched, published book by an actual expert on the subject. I don't think you understand WP:RS well enough to continue editing. If you really believe there are that many errors in Beatles articles, you need to be discussing your changes instead of going on a spree of changing the details for song after song. Frankly, the articles on the Beatles are generally among the better written and researched articles on rock musicians, it's unlikely they are as riddled with errors as you seem to think. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, It's more of a guide than a fansite. And it is researched. Just give it a chance, they know what they're doing. There are two people who basically are experts on the songs, Joe and SD. I'm just saying don't just give up on the site completly.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• You are just not getting it. Let me put it another way. We have an article here on Ian MacDonald. He was granted full access to the Beatles master recordings of these songs and spent years writing his book. Do you honestly believe that two random guys with a website are a better source of information than Mr. Macdonald? Beeblebrox (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• This isn't strictly related to your unblock so I'm posting it outside of the unblock request. Some of the edits you made regarding what Ringo was playing in each song are a bit misguided. A drum set or drum kit is, as the names imply, a variety of drums and cymbals assembled together and played as a single instrument. There's no need to list the individual elements used during each song, the casual reader for whom Wikipedia is supposed to be written, is not interested in that level of detail. If there's something unusual being used, that's one thing, but listing "hi-hat" or "bass drum" as though they are instruments unto themselves is probably only going to confuse most readers. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean on Norwegian Wood? Yes, I was right as Ringo dosen't play a full kit on that song. Or on your "hi-hat" statement, he played that as a singular instrument--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone plese get MelicansMatkin over here please? I want to talk to him about his U2 article edits--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@All: Please give me a moment to teach Das a bit about reliable sources.

@Das: I'll start a lesson page about reliable sources for you tomorrow. In the meantime, don't argue about your source. Please try to open your mind to what these people are saying; you say that we can't always trust books, but if that's the case, then we can't trust fan sites either. We can distrust books and believe what we want in non-Wikipedia life, but on Wikipedia, books are more trustworthy than someone else's words. Original research does not necessarily have to be yours to be original research. I hope this clarifies things. If you still have questions, please go to my talk page and I will do my best to answer them. Cheers, Twilight Helryx 03:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh.. Das is blocked and is now resorting to socking TH...--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 03:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is? I thought it settled that it's not him. But I'm a little behind here. If you see his sock, could you point it out for me? What he needs now is a very loooooong talk with his adopter.--Twilight Helryx 04:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pectoralz (Almost the origional name for Coldplay. The settled for "The Starfish" later)--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 04:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Standard offer applies here, so a minimum of six months from now—assuming he can stay out of more trouble between now and then—before we should even consider unblocking him. — John Cardinal (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving wikipedia for some time cause I am busy and I don't really feel like editing anymore. So if someone could delete all of my special pages.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to quite Das. There's always the standard offer :)--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 00:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter

Project Talk Page The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue XVI - January and February 2010 Project News The articles by quality table has been changed for all WikiProjects as a result of changes to the WP 1.0 bot. Due to these changes editors are encouraged to add the {{EurovisionNotice}} banner to the talk pages of categories, files, templates, portals, disambiguation pages, as well as articles and project pages. This has the benefit of making the table more complete and covering such pages under article alerts. An FAQ has been created for the Eurovision Song Contest 2010 page in an attempt to mitigate repetitive discussions on the talk page about content in the article. This has not been previously done for a Eurovision article, though they are also used in other high profile areas such as Barack Obama and global warming. There has been persistent problems on Anna Vissi related articles with a disruptive IP hopping editor making repeated sweeping and unwanted changes to the articles despite being asked to stop. An account that displayed similar behaviour, JORJKIE.AV (talk · contribs), has now been blocked indefinitely and some pages have had to be semi-protected for long periods. Disruption continues from sock puppets of banned user Xtinadbest (talk · contribs), including on Eurovision related articles. Editors are advised to report suspicious activity from new accounts to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xtinadbest. Eurovision News On 7 February 2010 a draw was held to decide which semi-final of the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest each country will participate in. The draw also decided, for countries qualified straight to the final, which semi-final they will vote in. Notable confirmed changes to the format of the Eurovision Song Contest this year include that the semi-finals will now be divided into two halves, and that voting will be open throughout each show rather than only after all entries have preformed. Five countries have now confirmed participation in the 2010 Junior Eurovision Song Contest which is scheduled for 20 November 2010. The contest will be held in Minsk, Belarus. It was announced in January 2010 that the Third Eurovision Dance Contest has been postponed a second time. It was originally due to be held in 2009, but was then postponed till 2010, and may now not happen at all, at least within the next two years. The EBU have justified the decision by saying there has been a decline in the popularity of TV dance shows. Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here! Page Milestones Sandie Shaw was tagged as a possible copyright infringement, but problematic material has now been removed. It's All About You was moved to Nuk mundem pa ty following discussion. António Calvário, Ruslan Alekhno, and Spain in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest were proposed for deletion, however in all cases the proposals were contested. Pfuri Gorps & Kniri was nominated for deletion at articles for deletion (AfD) and deleted. Innocent Heart was nominated for deletion at AfD and was deleted. Due to disruption the page was also protected to prevent re-creation. Users may consult an administrator or make a nomination at deletion review if they wish to make a good faith attempt at re-writing the article. Je ne sais quoi (song) was nominated for deletion at AfD and kept. The participation of WikiProject Eurovision members was commented on during the discussion. From the Members Welcome to the sixteenth edition of the WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter! We're in full swing now! Although the Eurovision Song Contest is around 2 months away, this is probably one of the busiest times of the year for the WikiProject, with a whole load of semi-finals, quarter finals, heats as well as national finals to see who the country chooses to represent them at this years Eurovision Song Contest. We now know which of the 35 countries will vote and perform in which semi-final. With the 'Big Four' and host country, Germany and Spain voting in the first semi-final and France, Norway and the United Kingdom in the second semi-final. With 22 out of the 39 countries decided, we are just about half way through, with a whole lot more to come! So when creating new articles about a performer or song, please remember to add sources either from Eurovision.tv, ESCToday or other reliable sources. Please get involved, and contribute anything to articles whether it's a little spelling mistake or a whole new paragraph, and remember to look at the talk pages and have your say on any discussions that may be present. Keep up the good work! -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] Member News The project currently has 80 members, with two joining and two leaving in January and February. One user left due to retirement, another due to being blocked indefinitely. Want to invite new members? Place our invitation template on the talk page of anyone you would like to invite to our project. New Members We would like to welcome the new members who joined in January and February (by date joined): HOUZI (talk · contribs) DannyBoy20802 (talk · contribs)

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by xenobot 13:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ian Little has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]