User talk:Enigmatic2k3

Welcome!

Hello, Enigmatic2k3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for SummerSlam (2007). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- LAX 21:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Welcome! Your recent edit to The Incredibles I reverted due to the fact that it had nothing to do with the actual page. If you can find references to prove this then you might be able to add some of it back. Stealth (talk) 22:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The unsourced addition was:
"Special locations known as dungeons and raids normally require a combined effort to succeed, with dungeons using groups of 5 or 10 players and raids with exceptionally powerful boss enemies requiring 25 or 40 players."

However, it duplicated existing sourced content, and to some extent conflicted with:
"A typical dungeon will allow up to five characters to enter as part of a group. Some dungeons require more players to group together and form a raid of limited size (up to forty players) to face some of the most difficult challenges.[32]"

I removed the unsourced new text. Perhaps the 2 could be merged, if the source supports the new addition, or if there is a better source you care to cite?sinneed (talk) 03:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing wp:RS is right behind wp:NPoV in difficulty, I think. With computer gaming, it is annoying because a lot of the time one is tempted to just say, "Well, go log in.", but that is no good. :) It is not unusual simply not to be able to put some point one wants into the article. I have struggled to find a source for an alternate meaning of Mob (computer gaming) with no success. So the meaning I learned is on the cutting room floor so to speak. One day I'll find one. I hope. :) sinneed (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Drizzt Do'Urden, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) BOZ (talk) 20:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. I usually just pick up a couple of issues regularly a month, especially with the economy being what it is, and use the net to keep up with what's going on with the other titles Marvel has. As far as the various X-titles go, www.uncannyxmen.net has detailed summaries on just about every issue of an X-title that's been put out. The site also has a lot of other issues from different titles in which an X-character has made a guest appearance. It's pretty useful for research purposes, especially regarding instances in older comics.Odin's Beard (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While I see your point, the reason I use "swift deletion" is because the wrestling articles are a target for new and unregistered users who constantly add information that doesn't comply with notability, point of view, verifiability, and original research policies on Wikipedia. In particular, original research is a big problem because users love to add moves, terms, promotions, etc that they made up for their backyard wrestling league. When someone has a large number of articles to watchlist, it is more efficient to just delete entries that don't comply with policy...the "drive by users" never check again so it isn't a problem and it gets the newbies in the habit of adding properly sourced information to pages.

For "face in peril", I'm not exactly sure how notable the term is, but if you want to add it to the list, use Template:cite web to format the citation (if you need more help, look at how it is done in a well-referenced article]]. There is a list of websites that can be used at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide#Sources. For the example to be valid, you need to provide a reliable source that uses that specific wrestling term, otherwise it is original research.

As for the mention of "face in peril" on other Wikipedia pages, I don't watch them all (and it would be impossible for me to try). All I can do is keep everything in order in the articles I do watch. Plus, I generally don't delete information that is already on a page when I first get to it...I generally add {{fact}} tags, and delete the info if a source isn't provided after a length of time. I can, however, delete new contributions if they do not comply with Wikipedia policy. Nikki♥311 23:12, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Death of Evil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Smile (2009 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Prayer to a Vengeful God (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Flashback, Transient, Urchin and Subway

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Smile (2009 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references provided to indicate that this topic is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Identity 7: Deadly Sins, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Forsaken, Onward and Haste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enigmatic2k3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Open Door (2008 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Open Door (2008 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Identity 7: Deadly Sins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable compilation album. No reliable sources included, and searches indicate that it fails the WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 16:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Identity 7: Deadly Sins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identity 7: Deadly Sins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rorshacma (talk) 06:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]