User talk:Goldnpuppy

Hello, Goldnpuppy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 20:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi there - I saw you added this article and immediately it got tag for prod delete. I think it should probably stay - I cleaned it up quite a bit and added another link; however if you have some solid 3rd-party sources (maybe a news article or something) it would certainly go a long way toward preventing/defeating an AfD if someone should choose to flag it as such. CredoFromStart ^talk 18:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just stopping by with wikicookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goldnpuppy, welcome aboard. If I can help let me know. We share a lot of common ground. You might consider adding something to your user page. See WP:Userpage for suggestions. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 16:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC) Stan[reply]

This was some very nice work. Thank you. Herostratus (talk) 17:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Goldnpuppy (talk) 21:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. So how are you doing? I infer from your talk page that you are a long-time but probably infrequent editor... everything working out OK for you? Herostratus (talk) 04:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I provided an answer to your question concerning what year the KKK burned a cross in front of Shrine of the Little Flower in Royal Oak. My comments are on the discussion page for that article. I also named some books you can read if you are interested in learning more about the life of Father Coughlin and his early years at the National Shrine of the Little Flower. In addition to the books I mentioned, there are also two biographies of Father Coughlin written in 1933. One is by Louis Ward, and the other is by Ruth Mugglebee. Here is a link to my comments.JDefauw (talk) 00:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)JDefauw[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:National_Shrine_of_the_Little_Flower

On May 12 you edited this listing by changing the page names of some of the cathedrals. In doing so you broke the links to numerous pages with the list. I did my best to reinstate the pages this evening, but I did not check my work against yours to know if I caught them all. I do know that all Catholic cathedrals (Latin Rite and all the Eastern rites), as well as those of the Episcopal Church, have pages on Wikipedia. There are three exceptions from the list: St. Nicholas of Myra in Anchorage, Alaska; St. Paul the Apostle in Savannah, Georgia; and the Cathedral Shrine of the Transfiguration in Orkney Springs, Virginia do not have pages (and do not appear to be cathedrals either, but that's another matter). I have no idea about the various Orthodox cathedrals and whether they have pages. You might want to go back through and check whether or not you broke the links to any other cathedrals. Farragutful (talk) 03:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before I made any changes, there were 135 entries on that page that had no links to articles. Today, there are 134.Goldnpuppy (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess I did a better job than I realized. Farragutful (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request clarification of an edit you made a few years back to United States Bicentennial. You wrote that the Bicentennial logo was selected in 1974, but it had already appeared on a U.S. postage stamp in 1971. Also, the links cited there ([1], [2]) appear to be broken. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was reverting your edit on the page on the grounds that TV By The Numbers is not a journal and accidentally clicked Twinkles rollback vandal feature I just want to apologize and let you know that I meant to revert as a good faith edit and bot vandalism. TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goldnpuppy,

When able, could you please help me update the references for the following articles:

• Barney Martin
• Eleanor Parker
• Dolores Gray
• Ellen Drew
• Jayne Meadows
• Audrey Meadows

It would be much appreciated as I'm having a bit of trouble trying myself. Thank you so much!I'm Listening to 80s Music (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to work on Barney Martin tonight. I'll take a look at the others and see what I can do.Goldnpuppy (talk) 06:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Michigan State Capitol for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 17:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit to Merrily We Roll Along (musical) you use an sfn reference "Secrest 1998". Unfortunately you do not define the reference, so nobody can look it up and the article is placed in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could fix it that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there , I’m looking to pay someone to update Jim Bailey (entertainers ) page .

I have the sources

thx Campbellman222 (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading the article and saw this: "In 1989, the store formed a holding company with Japanese department store Isetan to operate stores in both countries. The first Tokyo store opened in November 1990. The agreement also called for the holding company to spend $250,000 to open 30 smaller stores of approximately {{convert}6,500|sqft|m2}}" Could you add a cite for the $250,000 figure. That is only $8,000 per store! Or did you mean to put 250,000 per store?

Thank you  • Bobsd •  (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It took a while, but I found the article and cited it. While it may mean per store or $250 million from Barneys and another amount from Isetan, it says only: "The new agreement calls for spending about $250 million to buy sites and open stores, said Robert Pressman, a Barney's executive vice president." Goldnpuppy (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding a citation. But the current text actually says $250,000 ... not $250,000,000. Now that there is a citation ("...The new agreement calls for spending about $250 million ...") I'll go ahead and change the text to match.  • Bobsd •  (talk) 21:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

George Rogers Clark National Historical Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 14:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the reference you added to IMDB in Montana Jordan; the rest of the edit was not problematic. Just so you know, IMDB is not a reliable source; see WP:IMDB. The statement had two other cites, anyway, so no reason to have a third. TJRC (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add the IMDb reference, it was already there but incorrectly attributed to Deadline. Goldnpuppy (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good edit then, at least fixing the misattribution. Sorry on the mix-up, in the diff it looks like you were the one adding it, but looking at it more carefully, I see that that's not the case. TJRC (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I know it's not a reputable source, but wasn't sure what to put in its place. Goldnpuppy (talk) 23:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goldnpuppy. I was cleaning up some REFSPAM when I came across your edit from a few years ago here. I've restored the LATimes ref. Any recollection of why you did that? --Hipal (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't recall exactly, but most likely it was because the LA Times references wasn't accessible. Goldnpuppy (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]