User talk:Guandalug

If you want to contact me urgently, please use my talk page at the German wikipedia. Feel free to write in English there. If it's not urgent, you can leave me a message here as well, I just don't monitor this page as close.

In case you wonder why there's so many less-than-friendly ppl vandalizing my Talkpage: They don't like the fact they were banned on deWP for (constant) trolling and harassment. By now, we ban on sight... and usually, those bans result in a vandalism here. --Guandalug (talk) 17:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, checking the interwikis is exactly what I did. I don't even know which languaje is that, but I clicked in the green point and it sended me to a page where I did not understand anything either, but the interwikis link to "Wikipedia:Good articles". I checked as well our own page for featured articles, and it has its own interwiki starting with zh, different from the other page. MBelgrano (talk) 23:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me see: en:Adam Smith links to zh-classical:斯密亞丹, which has a green star icon in the upper right corner. Clicking on that leads me to zh-classical:維基大典:卓著, which has (among others) the interwikis de:Wikipedia:Exzellente Artikel and en:Wikipedia:Featured articles. Therefore I assume that the green star markup means "Featured article" (as I cannot read the language at all, I have to guess from facts like those). In fact, the zh-classical "good article" markup seems to be a blue 'L' style icon (like the german Wikipedia one, actually), as can be seen in zh-classical:漢語. That one leads to zh-classical:維基大典:正典 which in turn interwiki-links to de:Wikipedia:Lesenswerte_Artikel and en:Wikipedia:Good_articles. Thus, I assume the "Link FA" markup for zh-classical in Adam Smith is correct. Is there any indication my logic is flawed? If so, I'll revert the changes, of course. --Guandalug (talk) 08:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting your bot to do the work of adding this template to articles. Will the bot continue to maintain articles with this template so that they are all up-to-date? Gary King (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's its task to maintain Link GA the same way as Link FA (or Link FL), wherever those templates are in use. I learned about the Link GA - template reactivation on the german Wikipedia, where somebody added the enWP template to the documentation, so I let my bot know. And yes, I'll run it once a month to keep stuff up-to-date (or as much as possible). --Guandalug (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just noticed that you added a GA link on the Washington, D.C. page, but it doesn't seem to be working. There's nothing to indicate in the language list that the article is GA. Thanks! -epicAdam^(talk) 14:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely that depends on your chosen skin ... and whether you cleared your cache or not. I do see a green "plus" symbol in the language links (Vector skin). --Guandalug (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. I'll check again. Best, epicAdam^(talk) 15:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Esperantido was listed as GA in Esperanto, but it's not. Perhaps it was mislisted in another language, and the bot copied the error? — kwami (talk) 20:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

eo:Esperantidoj has a button linking to eo:Vikipedio:Legindaj artikoloj which mentions {{Link GA}} so it seems to be a GA. Gary King (talk) 00:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the blue 'L' in the upper right corner is the markup for 'good article' ("Lesenswert"). The template is eo:Ŝablono:Leginda and transwiki-links to the german 'good article' template. --Guandalug (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good work with those GA templates I'm doing some work too [1] Regards --by Màñü飆¹5 ^talk 10:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your luck my bot doesn't dislike meddlers in his affairs... ;) Good job, saves me a few edits, I think. --Guandalug (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, some troubles emerged, I suggest you to stop adding Link GA until that thread closes --by Màñü飆¹5 ^talk 20:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's kinda hard to do..... my bot is done for this. Next run end of the month, so I guess the trouble ought to be over by then :D --Guandalug (talk) 07:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your bot probably has a bug. It replaced the Link FA|cs template for Link GA|cs in the Nebular hypothesis article without any reason. I have reverted it. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 08:57, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting this. It's not really a "bug", just a timing problem. The articles was made "featured" on June 6th, but the bot didn't re-scan the articles (and thus had the old state in its database). I gotta rewrite that bot module, maybe there's an efficient way of handling this problem. --Guandalug (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots Newsletter, April 2017

Greetings! The BAG Newsletter is now the Bots Newsletter, per discussion. As such, we've subscribed all bot operators to the newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: Arbcom Magioladitis ARBCOM case has closed. The remedies of the case include: Community encouraged to review common fixes Community encouraged to review policy on cosmetic edits Developers encouraged to improve AWB interface Bot approvals group encouraged to carefully review BRFA scope Reminders/Restrictions specific to Magioladitis BRFAs We currently have 27 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions There are multiple ongoing discussions surrounding bot-related matters. In particular: RFC on COSMETICBOT Efforts at WP:CHECKWIKI to identify cosmetic fixes Requested move for the Bot Owners' Noticeboard A phabricator ticket T162685 has been made to have a "bots" tag, so issues related to bot frameworks can be tracked New things Several new things are around: A BAG Guide has been created (WP:BAGG, discussion). Users now have the option to hide AWB from their watchlists via a script (WP:HIDEAWB, discussion) The guidance on how to deal with bot issues has been overhauled (WP:BOTISSUE, discussion) The bot policy has been updated to clarify that bot operators are required to register accounts. (WP:BOTACCOUNT, discussion) Wikimania Wikimania 2017 is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, let us know! Thank you! edited by:Headbomb 11:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] (You can unsubscribe from future newsletters by removing your name from this list.)

Since you've been inactive for a while, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]