User talk:HeyElliott

Hi Heyelliot can you make an edit for me in Multan article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawn of new era (talk • contribs) 16:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elliot Your changes to Sydney United Page to reinstate wording is uncalled for as the previous text and comments are untrue and based on media propaganda. Seems a little unfair that you reinstate the text but have no idea how damaging it actually is?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.122.28 (talk) 22:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still awaiting a response 2001:8003:2413:8100:99A3:20F0:BC38:D594 (talk) 05:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mai jana chahuga 223.223.131.157 (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dani to Moon please have 116.14.135.48 (talk) 11:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Burmese calendar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HeyElliott! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raised beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropogenic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pls review WP:Sea of blue and WP:Overlink Moxy- 03:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This. You are currently causing a lot of cleanup work for other people. We do not link common English words that a reasonable English speaker would speak, and we don't generally link commonly known countries such as Canada, United States etc. Additionally we generally only link a term once in an article, not every time we have it. Canterbury Tail talk 11:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail @Moxy

Hi, not sure if I'm replying right, apologies. I reviewed the two links by Moxy, and I will be much more careful with what I link when editing articles. I'm genuinely very sorry for all the cleanup work I've caused, I got a bit overexcited about what I thought was helping (I realize now that it wasn't, and was just creating more work). Again, I'm sorry, and I thank you both for bringing this to my attention. I hope y'all both have a wonderful day, or afternoon, or night. HeyElliott (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed links that you have recently added. Rwood128 (talk) 10:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fagradalsfjall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANSS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HeyElliott 36.37.194.187 (talk) 00:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your intention to improve Wikipedia.

Two things, however:

1) Please provide at least brief edit-comments for your edits - I see you have habitually not provided any. This flashes all sorts of red warning lights for other editors who will naturally suspect at best inexperienced editing, at worst vandalism.

2) There is no point replacing established wikilinks which happen to redirect, by piping them to their redirect targets. The tiny optimisation doesn't help readers; and quite often it's actually wrong - a link may be to a section or anchor within the target article, rather than to the top of the article, so it's wisest and best just to leave these things alone.

All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap

Hi Chiswick! Thank you so much for your message.

As for 1 - I will absolutely start providing them, thank you so much for letting me know. For 2, I am aware of that one and try to avoid doing that, however, (after making sure I know what section it's going to), fix it if the spelling is wrong. Is that alright, or should I stop doing that, too? (Honest question, sorry if that comes off as rude!).

Thanks so much, I hope you're having a wonderful day. HeyElliott (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling being wrong being, not an alternative spelling, but a flat out typo. HeyElliott (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong spelling of course, just mark the edit comment "spelling" or even "sp". Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you so much! I truly appreciate you making me aware of these things, I always wanna be a better editor! I hope you have a great day. HeyElliott (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Razan Al Mubarak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HeyElliott, I noted some of your edits from my watchlist. You put quotation marks around ref name, this is only necessary if the name is two words so “Quetzal 1964” but not necessary for Quetzal1964. It’s also not necessary to list the authors as first1, last1, this gets really tedious in multi authored refs, like some IUCN Red Data List accounts. What you have done isn’t wrong, just unnecessary. I am a believer in “leave well alone” rather than tinkering for tinkering’s sake. Quetzal1964 (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrea Siodmok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chronicle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Edda Award for Best Director

added a link pointing to Null

Edda Award for Best Leading Actor or Actress

added a link pointing to Null

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edda Award for Best Director, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Null.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your many typo fixes. You've done a great job making incremental but important improvements to the articles you’ve worked on. A heads up that you yourself have had a typo in your frequently used edit summary: grammer should be spelled grammar. Wallnot (talk) 01:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your message! I worry that I'm accidentally or unknowingly doing the wrong thing, so I genuinely appreciate someone telling me that I've been helping, it means a lot! And thank you so much for letting me know about the typo, I'll go fix that now! I hope you have a great day!

~~~~ HeyElliott (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elliott! THanks for your remarks on my Cox article work. I found more material on him about his life in the gay culture. I feel unqualified to write about it, but would appreciate collaborating with someone on writing about his life in that way. Can I interest you in this project? Many thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

ASL (disambiguation)

added a link pointing to American Soccer League

ASP

added a link pointing to Adult service provider

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't fix British English articles into American. Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm so sorry if I've done this, I always do my best to keep it in whatever style was already there. If possible, could you please let me know what page I did this on? I want to know where I messed up so I can prevent a mistake in the future. Thanks so much, have a good day! HeyElliott (talk) 02:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I went and saw where I messed up. I'd copied and pasted the title of the DNA article to fix the em/n dash/hyphen typo, and must have not realized the spelling was different on hybridization. Thanks again for bringing this to my attention! Have a good day! HeyElliott (talk) 02:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Junichi Okada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yasui Santetsu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

0964000511 196.188.174.10 (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hola 2803:9640:850D:AA00:25E9:B61:4B2F:6976 (talk) 03:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lewis (given name)

added links pointing to Loe and Lowie

Shane (name)

added links pointing to Shane O'Mara and Shane Curran

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lewis (given name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Loe and Lowie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Military History wikiproject uses dmy dates. One member changed all the dates in the article to dmy. It only makes sense to retain that usage. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 07:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emeritus (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

as you did at Vikramaditya. Doug Weller talk 10:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1994 German federal election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I proposed some updates to the page about biotech company Modern Meadow, and I think this might be of interest to members of the Biology WikiProject. I see you’re a member of that project who has been actively editing things on Wikipedia during the last six months, and I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look at them? The proposals address the concerns of a flag posted on the article. I have a COI and don’t want to violate Wikipedia rules by editing the page myself. Thanks very much for your time. Olympus4Me2 (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bundestag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reichstag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Minor barnstar

I have seen you around a few articles—fixing spelling mistakes, formatting errors, removing duplicate links, adding templates (language, date and conversions etc.) and so much more. Thanks for your helpful contributions to Wikipedia! Your small changes shall not go unrecognised; here, have this barnstar! Hope to see you around even more in the future, and have a great Christmas if you celebrate, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 03:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness, you have absolutely made my week, my month! Thank you so much, I seriously appreciate this so, so much!! 😭 I do celebrate, and I hope you have a wonderful Christmas or wonderful holidays in general!! Thank you so so so much, have an awesome day!!!! HeyElliott (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amsterdam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hortus Botanicus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube.6907180.com web.hp1870 I know you are going well for us all of friends who 136.158.83.111 (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please do not vandalise pages like you did over at United States Census Bureau

if it was a mistake, then be sure to review your edit first before going ahead with said edit. hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 10:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey HeyElliott; Happy New Year! Your small yet significant contributions during 2022 have helped to shape and safeguard Wikipedia's reputation as a formal and well-written encyclopaedia. I hope that Wikipedia will continue to see your wonderful contributions this forthcoming year, and hopefully we can get to interact more!

Yours truly, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 00:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC) (It is now New Year's Day in UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, this is so sweet!!! Happy New Year, I hope you have a wonderful year and that we get to interact more, too!! :D HeyElliott (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Woah—you're fast! Thank you for the kind words, have a good one :) 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 00:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pluralism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freedom and Unity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pornographic film actor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advocate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vorë, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Educational institution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Community school.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Nice to meet you. I am a disclosed COI editor looking for some assistance. I noticed that you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine, and mention there that you are ready to help with anything. Would you kindly help out with my edit request for the biotech company, BeiGene, found here on Talk:BeiGene. You will see the request is for straightforward edits that update the page. If you agree with my request, I would much appreciate it if you could implement it. Thanks so much, LexBGNE (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HeyElliott, noticing on your userpage you are a pharmacy technician, I was wondering if you would be interested taking a look at the changes I made to that file. It is the changements like on "Tabloid" Hydiarg. Per-
chlor. gr. 1³² I am not sure about how to do this. No obligations, no hard feelings if you prefer not to react. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull is under a "consensus required" restriction, meaning "Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

upside down. Sun2293 (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Contact sport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing to these reference fields? I don't see any errors, and Francis Sheppard is most definitely the author / editor of the relevant chapters. At a rough guess, I think I've cited the SOL at least 100 times over 30 GAs without any issue. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry for any confusion. Taking a look at my edit that was reverted, here, and looking at references 4 and 8, it's giving an error that says " {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help): |author= has generic name (help)", due to the word "Editor" being in the author field. Since the text there was "F. H. W. Sheppard (General Editor)", I thought it was trying to say that he was just the editor, as does the links on those citations. Again, I'm genuinely sorry, I didn't mean to cause any trouble or confusion. If he's the author, too, I'll go ahead and edit the author field to say "F. H. W. Sheppard", just without "(General Editor)", since that was giving an error. HeyElliott (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just when I saw a summary "fixed errors" and then recognised them as citations I put in (or probably put in), I got somewhat confused, and tried to guess what the fix was, before giving up and thinking some WP:BRD would do the trick. Which it has. I think later citations use the (possibly) more accurate editor1-last=Sheppard|editor1-first=F.H.W, which probably won't trip that up. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that sounds fine too! Thank you for your kindness and discussing this with me. :) I hope you have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Elliot, this policy is for "terms" NOT the names of people or places. Just leave them. Johnbod (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reaching out to me. I'll make sure to not apply the lang template to names of people or places, I'm sorry about that. I (perhaps wrongfully?) assumed that not applying it to places meant cities, countries, that type of thing, and that it could be applied to things like museums themselves? HeyElliott (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has, higher up: "...templates output text in italics for languages with Latin-based scripts, if plain text is required, such as for proper names, |italic=no or {{{1}}} may be used: ...". I wouldn't use it for museums, nor do we normally do so, I think. Johnbod (talk) 02:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nayanjot Lahiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Stephen's College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the syntax of lang template is {{lang|de|Test}} (ISO-639 language code). IMHO {{lang|deu|[[Test]]}} is wrong. I even don't know, if {{lang|de|[[Test]]}} works. Grimes2 (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reaching out to me! I was going off of the links section on the Template:Lang page, which says to format links like that. And reviewing the page as a whole, I do see that it recommends the shortest possible language tag is used, so that is my mistake and I apologize. In the future, I'll use de and other shorter language tags. HeyElliott (talk) 19:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, {{lang|deu|[[Test]]}}: Testcode: deu promoted to code: de works. I was confused, because {{lang|de|Test}}: Test displays "German-language text" on hover. Sorry. Grimes2 (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no problem at all! I appreciate you letting me know about the shorter language tag thing, thank you! I hope you have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HeyElliott. I noticed that you changed a few short descriptions from "Office building in Manhattan, New York" to "Office building in Manhattan, New York, U.S.". I have removed "U.S." for now, as I do not agree that including "U.S." in these particular short descriptions is necessary. I normally would not mind specifying the country if the locale isn't very well known internationally (e.g. Pasadena, California, U.S.).

However, I do not think we should add "U.S." after "Manhattan, New York" for a couple reasons. NY is very well-known worldwide (particularly NYC), so I do not think adding "U.S." would aid navigation. Additionally, the short descriptions in question are already nearing the recommended limit of 40 characters that's outlined in WP:SDFORMAT. For instance, "Office building in Manhattan, New York" is already 38 characters long, and "Office skyscraper in Manhattan, New York" is exactly 40 characters. Unfortunately, if you added "U.S." to either of these descriptions, it would not show up in certain context; if a reader were searching the article on the mobile app, they might only see "Office building in Manhattan, New York, ...".

I've seen your other edits around, and I'd like to thank you for helping bring articles in line with the MOS; I only have a problem with these specific short descriptions. I hope this adequately explains why I have undone your edits to 1 Broadway and a few other pages. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reaching out! That makes perfect sense, and I won't add U.S. to those types of short descriptions in the future. Thank you so much, and I hope you have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 01:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're concerned that "New York" might be taken to mean "New York state" and not "New York City", you could add "City" to "New York", but, as Epicgenius says, "Manhattan, New York" is pretty universally known. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhong (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deng Zhong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, the word "man" is actually a fun instance of shifting meanings. in old English, it used to mean the same thing that human does now, with wer- and wif- to distinguish the genders. Words like woman, man-made, and mankind have "man" in them because of that original meaning, and not because of the modern one. So it's already a gender-neutral word! ^_^ (this, funnily, is also where the word wer-wolf has its origin.)--Licks-rocks (talk) 12:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For a lot of Japanese words in articles I've been confused about whether to tag them as Japanese or not. The biggest example is Kami which I consider to be an english word since it has vigorous english usage. I don't think the transliteration tag would be appropriate as a result Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 21:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

this edit:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%27O_pere_e_%27o_musso&diff=1151568203&oldid=1118530166

drops a lot of apostrophes which should instead be there. They are not for italics. —Gennaro Prota^•Talk 15:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for making me aware of this, and I'm very sorry about the error! Thank you again, I hope you have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 02:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently you deleted my contribution to Fascism in popular culture without explanation. It is a sourced and relevant statement so please explain your reason why deleted. Norwikian (talk) 07:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, that was not me that reverted your edit. HeyElliott (talk) 02:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Ray of Sunshine
	In a dark, dark encyclopaedia filled with problem-ridden articles, I always know that when you appear in my watchlist, my load is lighter. You improve everything I could have done, and I thank you for tirelessly hunting down curly brackets and beating sentences into shape. (Roundish ⋆t) 23:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness, this is such a sweet message. This made my entire year, thank you so so much. I seriously can't explain how much this meant to me, thank you!! I hope you have a wonderful day!!!! HeyElliott (talk) 02:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You freaking deserve it though, please never stop. (Roundish ⋆t) 22:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scrolling through your Talk page I see you've dealt with editors talking about your use of lang tags...unfortunately I have to add to this pile. I noticed your addition to Koinobori, but for some reason, we can't use {{lang}} inside of references, as it pollutes the resulting COinS metadata. Sorry they're such a mess, it's not exactly ideal, but it is what it is.—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 13:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reaching out to me! No apology needed - it sucks to know I was messing up, but I appreciate people correcting me so I can fix my mistakes!

I was not aware of that, so thank you for letting me know! I'll make sure to not put lang inside references in the future. Thanks again, and have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 18:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Airports in Aichi Prefecture indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey recently there is a user David dclork li who has been making disruptive edits on every india related edits most of them being clearly mentioned in the source. Hope you can warn the guy 103.81.215.177 (talk) 03:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He is this anonymous user who is reverting most of the edits without providing any proper citation. David dclork li (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved

Hi, HeyElliott. I'm not sure it's appropriate to replace the italics around book titles like Yunjing with {{lang|zh-Latn}}. The latter implies proper pinyin, which would include tone marks, e.g. Yùnjìng (falling tone mark over each syllable). But what is going on here is the default Wikipedia convention of romanizing Chinese names of books, people and places as pinyin minus tone marks (WP:PINYIN), as is common in English-language texts. Names of people (e.g. Xi Jinping) or places (e.g. Anyang) where this is done aren't italicized, of course, but Yunjing is because it's the title of a book – it isn't a proper foreign word. Kanguole 21:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

== Reporting a user ==

Hey Elliot recently there is a user Awater01 who has been making disruptive edits in Baruch Spinoza article. He seems to be a nationalistic Dutch who are mixing up things. It has been a stable version of article, but then he came up and started writing everyone was ignorant, wrong, undid many things. I alerted him to the fact he is misbehaving and should go to talk page firstly, and guess what? If said once he undid the stable version no one can change his version till there a consensus. What it is stupid. Could you to give him a notice of his misbehaviour? I know that it’s possible but I don’t know how to do that, hahah I saw you have being really kind in helping new editor to keep Wikipedia a good space :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PepGuardi (talk • contribs) 01:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Elliot , that user in edit warring on Baruch Spinoza Wikipedia is now harassing me, calling me of many things and mocking around the fact I am quite recent on Wikipedia. Is there anything on Wikipedia that could make him stop that harassment? Please let me know — Preceding unsigned comment added by PepGuardi (talk • contribs) 03:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PepGuardi, I'm so sorry this is happening. I'll admit that I've not dealt with a situation like this on Wikipedia, but I did find this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment#Dealing_with_harassment

Which has some links to where you can go to ask other people or admins for help. Thank you for reaching out to me, I hope this can get resolved. :(

(Sorry if my reply wasn't the best haha, it's late in my time zone and I'm getting ready for bed) HeyElliott (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, he started doing that after I reported him for edit warring, he reverted your edition, I told him to stop then he reverted mine as well, he is like unstoppable, take look at what he put on my Talk page User talk:PepGuardi he is like accusing me of doing things he has been doing, no respect to the reversion you did, no respect to me… I mean I was expecting someone like that PepGuardi (talk) 03:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Now. Yes. In out. 67.140.195.68 (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Elliot, the user on Baruch Spinoza page who were engaged in edit warring last night was blocked, as we could expect since he was clearly not having a proper behaviour. However, I am not getting to get back to that stable version (he undid yours and my edits haha)... As you can see I am pretty new here, and he made two changes in a row then I am not getting to revert to the stable version like you did last night. Could you do that for me please? I hope when his block expires he can have a better behaviour :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PepGuardi (talk • contribs) 19:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:3rd-century Byzantine generals indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HeyElliott, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 02:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HeyElliott! I won't bother reverting, but London, United Kingdom is almost a tautology. Would you add US after, say, New York or Washington, D.C. ? Doug butler (talk) 02:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug, thanks for reaching out!

I absolutely would, and do!, add U.S. to those. While most people know that those places are in the U.S. or the U.K., some don't, and there is absolutely no harm in clarifying. Also, while the place most often being referred to is London, or New York, there do exist other places named London and New York.

I hope you're having a great night! HeyElliott (talk) 02:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HeyElliott!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i do not know why, but your latest edit of Nazism makes the nazi flag of the Template:Nazism sidebar not visible (this only seems to apply to your "MOS:FOREIGNITALIC" edits on articles which uses the Template:Nazism sidebar)

you are free to restore your edits but without making the nazi flag of Template:Nazism sidebar not visible Gooduserdude (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC) Gooduserdude (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the term churned out when relating to creative works is slightly derogotary and so not suitable for the neutral tone of Wikipedia, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm not sure what you're referring to? HeyElliott (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	LGBTQIA+
	Hello!! i was scrolling through edits made on the LGBT article and found you. i know you made the edit in like, june(or july, i forgor). anyway, thanks for editing the article,heres some wiki love!! Babysharkboss2 (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, this is so sweet, thank you so much!!! I hope you're having a wonderful day!! 🏳️‍🌈 HeyElliott (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you added a link to the start of the page, a clear error. Pelmeen10 (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

J 39.62.182.199 (talk) 16:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1829 establishments in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MDLITON 2404:1C40:94:B961:1:0:D375:26CB (talk) 12:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for replacing the "Official_name" parameter with simply "Name" in town and city infoboxes. That's something I too try to fix when I see one. Next step: for U.S. places, please use the format "City, State" for the "name" parameter. This is the preferred method as depicted in the WP:USCITIES guideline. Especially in New England, where town names are repeated in state after state, this will help avoid confusion. In other cases, such as "Merrimack", there is a major Merrimack River as well as a Merrimack County, so again, "City, State", keeps names clear at a glance. Thanks, Ken Gallager (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century German entomologists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:500s establishments in the Byzantine Empire has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

This is part of a larger nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Ghosn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there: it looks like your most recent edit restored (it looks like accidentally) some material that has been challenged and removed (see talk page, where there is an RfC going on). Based on your edit summary, I don’t think you intended to do this. Can you please fix? Thank you. Neutrality^talk 02:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on the al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion page? I was just attempting to fix the commas in my edit, and didn't realize that I accidentally added that material back. I'm very sorry about that, and thank you for letting me know, I rolled back my edit. I hope you have a good day! HeyElliott (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use 223.25.63.108 (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I wonder if you could help me with something ? on this site the description of Brighton. I’m wondering if you can help change this ? All descriptions state Brighton as a seaside resort ( which it is) but this needs to be changed to either city or city of Brighton and Hove. This could be added as a citation https://www.visitbrighton.com/ On the lead description it states “ Brighton is a seaside resort and one of the two main areas of the city of Brighton and Hove. But I feel this would be correct . “Brighton is a seaside resort and formally known as the city of Brighton and Hove. With this citation added on formally https://www.kingseducation.com/kings-life/10-fun-facts-about-brighton#:~:text=An%20important%20first%20fact%20is,two%20to%20be%20separate%20towns. I emailed the mayor of Brighton and have emails backs from the mayor and Brighton comms department in support of what I am saying. I have sent your email to our Comms department who will be able to help. Thank you for getting it right. Wikipedia often gets it wrong so it's good if someone who cares edits the pages.

Kindest regards

Minna

Minna Robertson Civic Office Manager | Brighton & Hove City Council, Brighton Town Hall, Civic Parlour, Bartholomew Square , BN1 1JA T 01273 291225 or 07824866987 | brighton-hove.gov.uk

Our customer promise to you We will make it clear how you can contact or access our services | We will understand and get things done | We will be clear and treat you with respect

Original Message-----

From: Sent: 06 May 2023 18:18 To: MayorsOffice <MayorsOffice@brighton-hove.gov.uk> Subject:

 This email originates from outside of Brighton & Hove City Council. Please think carefully before opening attachments or clicking on links. 193.117.198.82 (talk) 15:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC).         Thank you for your email, I share not only your concerns but also your frustrations![reply]

  This has been an ongoing issue for many years, we used to regularly go in and edit the page but every time we did someone else would then edit it back to say resort or town. Although thankfully the Wikipedia page retains both of the external links I added to the council website and to our official tourism site: www.visitbrighton.com (http://www.visitbrighton.com/).   As our resources are stretched instead of undertaking the Sisyphean task of updating Wikipedia, we focus on optimising the content of our website to ensure that we appear as the top result for Brighton-related searches. Please see below a screenshot of the search results for ‘Brighton’ on Google which shows that our VisitBrighton website appears before the Wikipedia entry - the majority of people use Google for online searches rather than Bing (84% Google / 9% Bing).   Thank you, Charlotte  

≪image002.png>

  Charlotte Barrow Senior Marketing Executive VisitBrighton www.visitbrighton.com (http://www.visitbrighton.com/)

Monday – Friday 8am-4pm  

<image001.jpg> (https://www.visitbrighton.com/brightonup. If you can help that would be great if not that’s fine too :) Thank you. 78.86.32.224 (talk) 19:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what’s your view on this? Also do you think it’ll be better coming from me when my ban is over? 78.86.32.224 (talk) 19:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gujarati 49.14.166.135 (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Medicine. I am seeking assistance in a matter regarding the page of Dr. John Oghalai. W12SW77 (talk) 03:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotta remember that character set. :-) [1]  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mijanur 2409:40E6:B:4A76:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 20:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this edit is not a good idea, as {{cite}} is a redirect to {{citation}} which is a CS2 template where, {{cite web}} is a CS1 template. Thus without further changes, mixes cite styles in the article. You could pick one of the other CS1 templates or add |mode=cs1. Keith D (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I had no idea mode=cs1 was an option! I'll be sure to use that or a different CS1 template in the future.

I hope you have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They changed the flag of India to Pakistan, I should be changed back. Much Love <3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India FlapjackJoey (talk) 04:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Qatari people by period has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Qatari people by occupation and century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Qatari people by century and occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category short keys need to start with a capital letter; they are case sensitive, and they're all already capitalized, so if you lower-case one with, say, a leading "s" then it it will not sort as you probably expect with the other "S" items.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I wasn't aware of this. I'll make sure to keep that in mind in the future. Thanks again, and I hope you have a good day! HeyElliott (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! I've just been informed that the software has been changed to no longer be case sensitive about this. My bad. There are now zillions of uppercasing sort keys doing things like "Association Of The Whatever" that need to be removed as redundant code noise.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  04:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no problem at all, I appreciate you updating me! :D HeyElliott (talk) 04:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank you for your work on MOS, thank you very much for what you do! I can't give you any Christmas presents, but I hope this thank you is worth almost as much as a gift. JackkBrown (talk) 00:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so so much for this message, it seriously means so much! It absolutely made my day. :D Thank you, too, for all the work you do! I hope you have a wonderful day!!!! HeyElliott (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HeyElliott: I wish you a happy Christmas! JackkBrown (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You too!!! :D HeyElliott (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Belarusian businesspeople by century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Afghan businesspeople by century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editor, greetings! I have proposed the merger of Religious calling into Vocation, an article to which you have previously contributed. I would be grateful for any comments you might have in the merger discussion section. Happy editing! IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HeyElliott :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

HeyElliott,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Happy New Year to you, too!! :D HeyElliott (talk) 15:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Azerbaijani composers by century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HeyElliott,

I have suitably edited the Conclusion of the article. Do take a look at it, and remove the maintenance template if its okay. If not mark out the citations required.

Regards,

. Akash139 (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do add a source. You can easily find it on his page in Wikipedia in italian. I don't fight against the destroyers of Wikipedia. --Agnellino (talk) 01:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the link to the Treshnish Isles on the Clan Maclean page?

Good man! Shipsview (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has 103.88.236.222 (talk) 10:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:18th-century biochemists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Bashkortostan protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HeyElliott. Since you recently made an edit to Viatris perhaps you would like to participate in a discussion concerning an edit request I posted at Talk:Viatris#Update_History_section. You need to scroll down a bit to see the issue, because when I posted the edit request, I forgot to include the 'Subject'. The request concerns updating awards, but more importantly, updating the Products section. Thank you so much for your input and help. PittGuy123ABC (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HeyElliott. Someone suggested that change "Label" to "Distributor" or something (as seen the orange-colored word in the table below). Your comments are appreciated. Regards. 113.210.105.113 (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @HeyElliot, I wanted to send some appreciation your way for the productive minor edits I have seen you make with good documentation. I also wanted to invite you to tag them as 'minor edits' (see: Help:Minor edit#How to mark an edit as minor) so editors receiving updates about major edits only won't be notified.

		The Minor Barnstar
		For all your work regarding the Manual of Style (MOS).

JacktheBrown (talk) 13:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness, thank you so much!! I really appreciate it, this made my whole month!! Thank you, I hope you have a great day!!! HeyElliott (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HeyElliott: it's a pleasure! Remember: the good you give always returns; enjoy the barnstar and be happy with all the work you have done so far. JacktheBrown (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You usefully tagged the article Jules Massenet, and as I have Jacques Offenbach up for FAC I'd be glad of an expert eye on what should or shouldn't have lang tags. If you have a few minutes I'd be grateful for your tweaks. But quite understand if you haven't got time or inclination. Tim riley talk 18:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:12th-century French novelists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit seems to primarily (and needlessly) change citation formats in contradiction to WP:CITEVAR, and then your edit summary lists "MOS:CQ, WP:CITEVAR, ce" as justifications. Am I missing something? If the issue is with archive links, you may want to check our Template:Webarchive, which allows you to add an archived version of a source, while keeping the citation format unchanged. Alansohn (talk) 20:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yiojfkkrk@HeyElliott 2400:ADC3:904:8400:B991:AF39:DB0:773F (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HeyElliott, how are you doing? I just read your edit on Swedish as a foreign language. May I know, are you Swedish? Your name seems so, I have been learning Swedish for the past 240 days and I have some questions. DonaldJacobb (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Donald! I'm not Swedish, sorry! And I only speak English.

Best of luck on learning Swedish, though! I think people who can speak multiple languages are awesome, it's such a cool skill. And welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you have a great day! HeyElliott (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, HeyElliott! I'm glad to be here. DonaldJacobb (talk) 23:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gordon Bremner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GiantSnowman 17:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the meaning of life if we still have to perish 😩😭 41.116.28.123 (talk) 10:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a retired semiconductor engineer / executive. Where are you getting your info on 5 nm processes? 2600:8800:6E80:7F00:0:0:0:8663 (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, what page are you referring to? HeyElliott (talk) 03:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to this section on the Wiki page "5 nm process" : The term "5 nm" has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors being five nanometers in size. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a "5 nm node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 51 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 30 nanometers".[3] However, in real world commercial practice, "5 nm" is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption compared to the previous 7 nm process.[4][5] 2600:8800:6E80:7F00:4DC7:FDFC:D2CA:DD54 (talk) 22:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what edit of mine is the issue? I didn't change any information about 5 nm processes, just formatting and style issues of the article. HeyElliott (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem. 2600:8800:6E80:7F00:B0E1:B215:3512:DB92 (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've added (I think) all the circa templates to the Ancient Egypt page, but since I don't have a programme and can't check every word on this page, I ask you to check if there's anything left, if you wish. JacktheBrown (talk) 23:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Athens Metro and Greek railway station articles, such as Piraeus station, have custom infobox headers: MOS:NOBOLD doesn't apply to custom headers, which usually follow the station signage "on the ground". A similar situation applies to South Korean railway station articles, which use {{Infobox station/Header Korail}}. --Minoa (talk) 06:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of rail transport modelling scale standards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Eldomtom2 (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please change aren't to are not in Autofellatio at "Health risks" section and change it's to it is in Erection at "Social" section. 2601:2C1:C582:DDC0:18E5:FD2:A43D:BBFA (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:12th-century establishments in Azerbaijan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—New Laws—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Imconfused3456_talk 12:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]