User talk:JE98

Welcome JE98!

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Reputation (Taylor Swift album) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reputation (Taylor Swift album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 07:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JE98, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 97198 (talk) 07:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move Stadium (sports network) to Stadium (TV network)? The choice of disambiguation was intentional, as this is a hybrid OTT/TV service and not a standard TV network per se. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lifetime Movies.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 14:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Investigation Discovery.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 14:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know, I've contested your move request on WP:RM/TR as WP:DAB does not say anything about disambiguating TV series by country. The sub-page WP:NCTV states under "additional disambiguation", "When there are two or more television productions of the same type and name, use one of the following methods": prefix the country of broadcast, the year of its debut, or "animated" (if it is). It's also currently the featured article on the home page, and it would seem a little unorthodox to move it while it is. Ss112 07:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Disney_Junior.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — fourthords | =Λ= | 17:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Oxygen 2017.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I know it's good faith editing and we need editors looking at redundant titling, but blanking out access to a major Greek corporation, an African-American TV channel and a major PLM software company for a free student mag of the University of Florida?? Blanking a dab page is never an uncontroversial move, it always requires a RM. And this case is a good example why. Also please we do not disambiguate by titles, but by topics. This is written into the foundation of WP:TITLE and WP:DISAMBIGUATION. Don't take this the wrong way, thanks for your edits. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Disney Channel 2014.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I wasn't done with all the moves when you removed them. At least check to see if all the moves have been completed, and please leave the move request removals to those who are actually making the moves. Thank you. SkyWarrior 01:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to No Limit (G-Eazy song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Gotham episodes instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gotham (season 2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 03:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Investigation Discovery.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you thought it was a good idea to move Doubling Down (South Park) and then move it right back to its original location. Did you not think that I check titles for ambiguity before I create the article? Bottom line, if there's a disambig in the title, it is there for a reason. I checked the term "doubling down" before I created the article, and I already knew that it was a blackjack term. Bottom line, please don't move articles unless you know what you are doing, it causes problems. - SanAnMan (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Channel 2014.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am considering creating a list of locations for Dave & Buster's on Wikipedia, as the sports bar arcade has 103 locations at this moment (with more to come very soon). I don't care if it is part of the Dave & Buster's article or a separate place, I just had the idea in mind. However, since this is my first time doing something like this, I have a few questions:

• Besides the location and the opening date, is there anything else specific I would need to add in a list like this?
• Are there any articles of what I am trying to do for reference? I have not seen any myself.
• Is a list of locations for a business like this allowed on Wikipedia?

JE98 (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to put the same question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt a list of locations would be considered encyclopedic. For comparison, List of Macy's West locations redirects to the main company article - and I expect the average Macy's West location is far more impressive, and individually significant, that the average Dave & Buster's location. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. If there's something significant to be said about Dave & Buster's expansion strategy, based on secondary sources that discuss that strategy, the company article would be the right place, but listing them all doesn't help our readers understand the company any better. Huon (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't know if you've been following the UK chart as it's announced and checked other pages, but if you have and noticed they've been updated by another user, as they've started updating a chart it's kind of just a courtesy thing to let them continue on with it. Thanks. Ss112 16:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I'm listening right now. I only updated the position for "Naked" by James Arthur. JE98 (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just meant if you notice another user has updated chart peaks for a certain chart as it's announced or available, chances are they're getting around to it if not instantly. Ss112 17:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Understood, thank you. JE98 (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JE98. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you made this odd move without a discussion, and why is the target now disambiguated with "soul" and not "song"? I believe the latter was your intention. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: I sincerely apologize, that is 100% the case, I meant to type “song”, but I just typed the wrong word. I put a request on WP:RM/TR to change it, don’t know if you saw, but thank you for pointing it out. JE98 (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Mommy's Little Monster, JE98!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please seek to retarget all incoming links, per WP:USURPTITLE. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Mommy%27s_Little_Monster Please do this every time you move an existing article to create a disambiguation page, otherwise you create many problems for readers, templates, etc.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would very much like to see it in the mainspace as you do. Have you got enough material to see that it can enter the mainspace yet? --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Doing the best I can. If you can, feel free to add more information. JE98 (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Oh, and if you're interested, I want season 1 to have its own article too. JE98 (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I say the reception section can be expanded with reviews from here. But it is unfortunate that Gotham season 1 doesn't yet have a draft article. Is there a search engine that covers only American newspapers/websites? You could find more sources using such an engine. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Try the American Google. JE98 (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This was not helpful. You did not communicate with me nor leave any explanation of your actions nor attempt to solve the problem some other way. I had to track down why the move wasn't made. If your not an admin and can't help solve the problem leave it alone. Anyway I solved this another way. -- GreenC 14:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not remove the {{db-move}} template the way you did at Finesse (song). It needs to be there so that the move can actually be carried out. If you try to move the page to that title, it will provide an error message and prevent the page from being moved. That said, please don't remove the template again. Cheers. ToThAc (talk) 16:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @ToThAc: Okay, my apologies, I was not aware that this had to be done. Thank you for letting me know. JE98 (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the warning you already received, and ignored. --‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Xfinity Mobile.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop looking at the pages I created and nominate them for page moves. Repeatedly confronting my work because of an earlier dispute (yes, that one at "For You (Liam Payne and Rita Ora song)") is considered wikihounding. You wouldn't have touched those pages if you didn't look at my user page. Hayman30 (talk) 15:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Feels Like the First Time, you may be blocked from editing. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@El cid, el campeador: Excuse me, but I worked all night to fix every single link and change it to the Foreigner page. Maybe I should not have removed the notice, but I do not appreciate being threatened over this. It would be best if there was a discussion on the talk page if you want to delete it. JE98 (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot removed speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself. If you wish to contest the deletion, the deletion notice provides ample opportunity to do so. I gave you a warning because you were told in the past not to remove speedy deletion templates, and yet you did the same again. Best ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@El cid, el campeador: Actually, I looked through my talk page, I don't believe I was told so at all. JE98 (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved Filthy (Justin Timberlake song) to Filthy (song) as you have requested at WP:RM/TR. This means that the {{R from move}} rcat template should stay on the redirect, even if there are few or no links to the redirect. Please do not remove the template again, as you did in Special:Diff/818775033. I have also, by the way, tagged the redirect with {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}, because that rcat also applies. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mama Jonas Blue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Popeyes 2008.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See the continued discussion of the proposed move. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: I saw, thank you. JE98 (talk) 05:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

J, what's your motivation for seeking the shorter more ambiguous titles? In what way are they better than the more precise titles? Dicklyon (talk) 03:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: I can't say I have a motivation, per se, but when I see a song in parentheses "([arist] song)", and there's no other song with that same name, then it should be moved to "(song)". Common sense. JE98 (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're proposing changes based on "common sense" with no motivation? I don't understand. Dicklyon (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: Maybe common sense wasn't the right word, but on this issue it's a case by case basis. JE98 (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right, it is, but if you're proposing a change, it would be good to know why you think that change would be better. Just wondering why you're wanting to move in such directions. Dicklyon (talk) 16:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@El cid, el campeador: I apologize for that move. Like I said, I do not mean to move pages maliciously at all, I just thought the two songs with the same name should be split. If you disagree, I completely understand. From now on, I'll start making more move requests rather than moving the page myself. JE98 (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When you add new entries here, please take care not to remove already existing entries by other editors, as you did here. General Ization ^Talk 17:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@General Ization: But they were already moved, that's why I did it. JE98 (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave the maintenance of that page to those who completed the move. General Ization ^Talk 17:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@General Ization: Ok, thank you. JE98 (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Awesom-O, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faggot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a note. With a move like this (cur | prev) 01:36, 21 February 2018‎ JE98 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (27,140 bytes) (0)‎ . . (JE98 moved page Screen Memories (John Maus album) to Screen Memories (album) over redirect: No other album with the same exact name) (undo | thank) it's important to leave a hatnote to other albums with the same name. Same for songs. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: I didn’t feel it was 100% necessary in this case, but I’ve been working with hatnotes for other pages. But thanks for letting me know. JE98 (talk) 12:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JE98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2U".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:17, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating A Quiet Place, JE98!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please help resolve the incoming links.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should have talked to me about the decision. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iftekharahmed96: I found a SVG image, which the image page said was needed, so I uploaded the one I found. I don't see what's wrong with that. JE98 (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at BAMTech Media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please be aware of what was discussed in talk page discussion that you are involved in. The move discussion indicated the legal and official name of BAMtech LLC. That is why Iftekharahmed96 changed his vote. Spshu (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spshu: I understand, I get the message, I'll give up and quit Wikipedia. JE98 (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JE98: Dude, you don't have to quit Wikipedia. You just have to be more collaborative with what's best for the article. When I started here, I was in your position, I was frustrated that a lot of edits that I made were reverted. But then I realised that there's plenty of articles on this site that desperately need to be updated. And through this, I better understood the customs of Wikipedia. We value your edits as you clearly do your research with whatever you're going to add, but just try your best not to take anything too personally. Feelings and Wikipedia editing do not mix. At all. Stick around. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iftekharahmed96: Thank you for your kind words. After a week, I have decided to stay. I will still stand by the fact that that move was not properly dealt with at all, but I can deal with that another time. I appreciate your kind words once again. JE98 (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Breaking In, JE98!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Again, please seek to retarget incoming links to the intended article per WP:UPT so that the navigation ability of Wikipedia users is maintained, not hampered by your page moves (which have generated some controversy judging from your Talk page). In this case, it is likely that all or most of the incoming links refer to Breaking In (1989 film).

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 18:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JE98. I see that you've changed Magnum, P.I. into a disambiguation page. 948 other articles link to that title, and those wikilinks now lead to a list rather than directly to the article about the 1980 series. It's usual for the editor who creates a disambiguation page to fix the links, which in this case means changing most of them to [[Magnum, P.I. (1980 TV series)|Magnum, P.I.]]. Alternatively, with the new series yet to air, it may be that the 1980 series is still the primary topic. In that case, the 1980 page should keep the title Magnum, P.I.. We could create Magnum, P.I. (disambiguation) to list the new series, but (per WP:ONEOTHER) it's better just to add a hatnote at the top of the 1980 series mentioning the reboot. Thanks, Certes (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Certes: Hello, yes I could see why you would want to go and make the 1980 series the primary topic. However, many shows with reboots are also a case of WP:TWODABS. I actually didn't move the original page, someone else did, I was just finishing the job by creating a disambiguation page. If you are serious about this, then it would be best to create a discussion rather than just talk to me, because I cannot bring the 1980 series back to its original title. I will be fixing the remaining links in my free time later today. Thank you. JE98 (talk) 11:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It looks as if the new series is now getting some pageviews, so the move seems reasonable and I'll help out with fixing some of the links. Certes (talk) 11:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BAMTech Media.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In this request, you misrepresented the situation. You had knowingly redirected the Justin Tranchita song just minutes prior, and so KNEW that there was more than one song covered on Wikipedia with that title. This behavior is unacceptable. If you disagree with an article title, submit it for a full discussion, but if you lie again, I will take efforts to ensure your help in this area will no longer be possible. -- Netoholic @ 21:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deli nk was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MC Mack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MC Mack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deli nk (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for inadvertently reverting this edit, it was unintentional! TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheMightyPeanut: It's alright, I'm sure there's a bit of confusion right now in general following the name change. JE98 (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to NF (rapper) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to https://about.att.com/ecms/dam/snr/2019/July2019/StoryLevelBanner/AT&T%20TV%20BlogSTORY_LEVEL_BANNER_1600x483.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to [file description page], and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MTV2 logo 2013.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SundanceTV.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:We TV logo 2014.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.<?s> ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop removing the space between the infobox and the lead, leave it as is. Persistently removing it on every single page you came across to suit your personal preference is disruptive. Hayman30 (talk) 04:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hayman30: No offense, but I'm really starting to get angry over this. Do you have a legitimate reason why that's a problem? You're arguing with me over something so ridiculous that should not even bother anyone. I do it because I am removing an extra space in the article that I do not believe is needed. So I apologize if I'm coming off rude, but what exactly is the harm in what I'm doing? I really want a clear answer so that we can appropriately settle this personal grudge you have against me. JE98 (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well do you have a legitimate reason why you're removing that extra space? You're simply removing it because you don't like it, which is not how Wikipedia works. Yea, that extra space should not even bother anyone. If you're gonna create an article without an extra space, that's fine, but you don't remove it from every single article you happen to come across. I've asked you to stop doing it multiple times in the past and yet you're still doing it. I don't have a personal grudge against you, I was calmly asking you to stop doing it because it indicates your pettiness and is really disruptive. Hayman30 (talk) 13:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hayman30: Well maybe if you didn't make edit summaries like "IT WAS FINE", I would not have said you have a personal grudge. An extra space is completely unnecessary and I apologize, but it seems as if you're reverting what I am doing simply because you don't like it as well in my opinion. Again, I apologize if I sound rude because I am sure you are a decent editor (no sarcasm, apologies if you take it that way), but I do not want to end this as an "agree to disagree" situation. Tell you what, I'll ignore the space if its there and you stop showing anger towards me in edit summaries because that is the best deal I can think of. How does that sound? JE98 (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bro you see, all of this wouldn't have happened if you stopped removing the space after the first time I told you not to. If you feel that the space is unnecessary, that's your opinion, but there isn't a policy that allows you remove it from every page as it's a typo or something. It gives the editor a clear distinction between the infobox and the lead. You shouldn't have removed it in the first place. Don't try to put me in bad light by portraying me as a rude guy who insulted you for removing that little extra space. If you're gonna continue to cover up your mistakes, I have nothing else to say. Hayman30 (talk) 09:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hayman30: I understand and I apologize. I won't waste my time removing it anymore. JE98 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No phrase is always seen with a hyphen That's not a good rationale to oppose an RM/TR, or every single RM/TR involving hyphens would have to be rejected, and that's not our RM/TR process norm at all. A good rationale would be "this is an ungrammatical use of hyphen per MOS:HYPHEN; the nom is mistaken", or maybe "This is virtually never hyphenated, including in newspapers and books, not just in specialist literature".  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  18:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JE98, can I request that you do not blank any further sourced articles for charting singles from earlier decades. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: I meant to talk to you about that, actually. I apologize if I caused any harm by doing so. My purpose in blanking songs was because I felt as if the articles were too short and did not have enough information to be a full article. I realize you created most of these articles you are referring to, and if you take this as a personal attack in any way, I sincerely apologize. I'll tell you what, if I feel as if a page needs blanking, I'll discuss it with you, this way it would be somewhat of a fair compromise and maybe you could add more information to the page to avoid deletion. That sound fair? JE98 (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If a charting single from the 1960s, 70s, has a sourced article it should not be blanked. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Allstate 2017.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is one channel change I have no idea about; Spectrum doesn't carry it on their main packages at all and I wouldn't know how to access it otherwise. I'm afraid I'm going to have to pass on this one without any access to the network itself; I'm very sorry I'm unable to help you. Nate • (chatter) 18:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is alright, thank you anyway. JE98 (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A belated welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add synthesis to Wikipedia, as you did with your edit here. For an explanation on what synthesis is, please read the banner that now typically appears atop each episode's talk page. The relevant policies and guidelines are further linked there. Thanks.

Also, please take greater care when incorporating your additions into material already in an article. This sentence you added to the synopsis' final paragraph shows a extremely poor sense of composition. You dropped a mention of one of the two plots in the episode in the middle of an explanation of the other one, which makes no sense. In addition to the fact that where they stashed the babies is not an essential detail necessary for a reader's understanding of the episode's plot, placing it in between two sentences explaining Mr. Hankey's fate means that the beginning of the second sentence ("He arrives in the fictional town of Springfield...") makes no sense, because it's no longer clear who the pronoun "he" is referring to. 04:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Burning Gold.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Please help resolve incoming links.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JE98. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Travel Channel 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JE98. A belated WELCOME to Wikipedia!

I have a question. Is your claim that "TBA" should not be used for future episodes in South Park episode Infoboxes based on a policy, guideline, MOS or consensus? If so, can you link me to it? I've been editing the episode article for years, and we've never had any such practice. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 04:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Animal Planet 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JE98. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robbie Rotten, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JE98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robbie Rotten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Travel Channel 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney's Hollywood Studios 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ntx61 (talk) 14:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney's Hollywood Studios 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ntx61 (talk) 14:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Golden State Warriors 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Golden State Warriors 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 06:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Golden State Warriors 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sierra 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Animal Planet 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Visionworks.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Discovery 2016.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Discovery 2016.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If that happens again, you could just notify an admin, privately. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Thank you. JE98 (talk) 19:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marriott International.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 01:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Brit Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vice on TV.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably not overwrite the old image with the new image you uploaded but rather upload your new image to a different title. I would suggest reverting back to the old image and reuploading your image at a different title. Dough4872 21:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per commons:COM:OVERWRITE, I have reverted back to the old image. Please upload your image to a different title. Dough4872 21:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dough4872: I apologize, I'm not particularly knowledgeable with Commons, I just wanted to update to the current name. My file is at File:Wind Creek Bethlehem.jpg. If you would like to adjust some things on it, I'd appreciate it. JE98 (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Saturday Night Live (season 46), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BET Her.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at File:Magnolia Network.svg. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sumanuil 23:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil: I sincerely apologize I had no idea the SVG was corrupt before posting, I appreciate you reaching out and I promise that vandalism was not my intention, thank you for alerting me. JE98 (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear to be redundant, though. Sumanuil 01:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's been fixed and I re-added it to the article. Nate • (chatter) 23:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrschimpf: Thank you very much. JE98 (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Back to the Cold War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Chung.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on She Used to Be Mine (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dear Lover (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]