User talk:Mayur

I cited a source for the factually correct information on the copblock page edit. Was it removed simply for the sake of ideological bias/censorship?Master of Logic and Reason (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mayur, I'm not sure that I see how my edit wasn't constructive. The page had a maintenance notification saying that a source was needed identifying each of the people listed as members of the band. I did that by pointing to their Twitter profiles. Each member lists their affiliation with their band in their profile description.

-- RandomlyKnighted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomlyknighted (talk • contribs) 19:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The external link to their official page was a dead link that was a redirect to some kind of advert website, the edit was in good merit. Please check the actual edit instead of just reverting it because you 'think it was non constructive'. Weird.Tesseract 09:38, 29 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weird.Tesseract (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the feedback on one of my pages! :) GayleKaren (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You edited here? I might be mistaken - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GayleKaren/WMF_Recruiting_Strategy_Project&diff=461907878&oldid=461295792 GayleKaren (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I got it. Thanks for your kind thanks & Smile :)--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 19:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure you're reverting the proper edit and warning the proper editor. This was a reversal of vandalism, which YOU reverted as vandalism. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mayur! You were helping me with a Vandal issue and now I have come across something I am not sure how to fix. Can you look up Bradford Stroh's page please? How do I undo an edit like this? Basically the IP address 71.244.30.84 vandalized the page and then Antishill101 re-editted the same information this way I could not hit undo and correct it easily. Is there a way around this? Thanks in advance. Elementrider77 (talk) 04:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Elementrider77, You can request for its semi-protection that will reduce effect of sockpupetry from this page.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 07:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but how do I revert back to an old old version? They updated it several times so I could not simply hit undo and they made a ton of changes. 108.195.185.215 (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its very Simple first of all go to history the page and then click on revision you want to restore then click edit and save.Your desired version will be saved at the end.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 19:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I may have been fooled on this one but not sure. I traced the originating edit here, and I can't find anything on google to support the drink-driving claim... Timeshift (talk) 07:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As per wiki policies you can remove any unsourced and unreferenced content but whenever you are doing this you should have a proper reason for that and just mention it in edit summary.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 07:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank you for reverting the vandalism done on my page by C21ok. Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 18:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for such nice geetings:-)--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 18:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It appears that the warning you issued to me was in error. I was reverting a vandal's change which you picked up. I am assuming you are also using Huggle?? Yossiea ^(talk) 10:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was an error or edit conflict case.It usually happens when two ediotrs are reverting same edit.--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 10:20, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. YOU ARE ABUSING YOUR TOOLS. Removing unnecessary citation tags is not vandalism. You make a lot of edits like this. If I had any idea how to report you I would. Anyone got this on watch who can help me with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.90.180 (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You was removing Citation tag without any explaination in edit summary thats why your edits were reverted.Thanks--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am struggling to be polite. You are abusing your tools. I don't NEED to enter a clear edit summary though it is ENCOURAGED. You are supposed to LOOK AT THE EDIT and ONLY REVERT VANDALISM with your tools. If you looked at the edit you would see it was fine or disputable at worst. Revert not vandalism as vandalism is bad. I see you do this often. Please show more caution. I looked for the rules to make sur. You arent allowed to use vandalism tools for anything isnt OBVIOUS VANDALISM. And removing tags IS NOT removing CONTENT. Anyone is allowed to just remove tags if the problem is fixed or dont exist. LOOK IT UP. One more thing. I apologize if I was too rude in my summaries. I will need to work on that. Civility blah blah blah. I know that sounds dismissive but I have nothing good to say about its requirement that I be a bullshitter. Its a rule though. I get that. Wont do it again if I can help it. Oh another though its dumb. How do I sign without tildes? it wont type on my keyboard. Do you know?

Just use --~~~~ at the end of your comment for signing.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How does one flag a revert as "unconstructive"? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if any addition to any content is not related to it or random or having no explanation or vandalism you may revert it as unconstructive. This option is available in Huggle.--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What command do I use? Thanks in advance. Jim1138 (talk) 09:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my Huggle configuration, Make a Similar or different configuration for you Usehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mayur&action=editr:Jim1138/huggle.css to enable various options.Cheers--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 09:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the copyright issue, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm not familiar with the "rules" of uploading. You can help with copyright issues, it's in the image description. FYI, the image is a stock photo. Clammybells (talk) 02:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

== Chinatown in Australia ==

In my opinion photos cities of Australia should show and create Australian culture, Aboriginal culture (they are natives in Australia). Photo which you have placed isn't connected with it. Chinese culture should be showed in Chinese cities. A lot of articles about Australian cities show Chinese culture. A lot of guidebooks to the Australian haven't photos Chinese people. Articles in wikipedia doesn't show real Australian appearance. I would like to ask you about removing this photo very much. Yours sincerely

Thank you so much for helping revert the vandalism on the Muhamad Nazmi Faiz Mansor articles. :) 난 널 사랑해 ❤Reply❤ 12:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mayur … FYI, when an article's creator blanks a page, as occurred with Yannis Fagras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), then you should remind them of {{Db-author}} (since that was apparently their intention) instead of just restoring it. Happy Editing! — 72.75.56.190 (talk · contribs) _{15:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)}[reply]

You were faster than me reporting that vandal to AIV. Enjoy! Shuipzv3 (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Appreciation.Have a nice day:-)--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 09:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

actually, it was the edit you have removed what IMVHO made this article more honest and demanded the verifiability of this Wikipedia article. After your revert the article contains an unverified claim on a resonance. I could easily go back there and put citation needed in it.

Summing up, you seemed to want to remove an unverified claim, but in fact you did something very opposite - you removed the doubts and let an unverified claim to live. I don't know why you have done that - I know it is pretty easy to revert edits from an unlogged user - but please reconsider your edit.

And now the funniest part: this IP is public. The discussed edit was not mine, it is just from the same IP I am using right now and it was me who happened to be reading Wikipedia when I got your message. Fortunately or not, you managed to reach a Wikipedia sysop from an other Wikipedia language edition. :P The chance was actually pretty slim so you may think to go play some lottery or something. :)

Now I am logging in to make one fix and go.

But seriously, regarding this edit, if I were you I would reconsider it once again. And used a talk page. :)

Best regards (should you need a proof/contact) and happy editing, aegis maelstrom δ 12:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When you reverted The Wise Men you reverted the vandalism back in. Please take better care. > Best O Fortuna (talk) 13:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What template did you use on this page? I like the looks of it and want to use it myself. Sincerely, He's Gone Mental 12:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on GARC - Chennai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Night of the Big Wind _talk 14:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the edit summary (in this case: (WP:BLP)) before smearing someone with a warning. 71.139.149.95 (talk) 06:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mayur, I am not sure if you have subscribed to all the terrible mailing lists but we are planning to meet up in Delhi for Wikipedia's 11th birthday celebration. Would you be free to come? Would love it if all the experienced guys showed up :) Noopur28 (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

ABHIRAM 10:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--ABHIRAM 13:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you still need the abusefilter access? Please answer asap here. Kind regards. Wifione ^Message 14:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have revoked the abuse filter access temporarily pending the result of RFC at Meta-Wiki, m:Requests for comment/Userrights on hi.wiki. As I'm sure you know, you have been mentioned there but this is just a courtesy notice to let you know the reason for the removal of this right. To any administrators reading this, please do contact me before re-granting rights if you wish to grant pre-RFC outcome. The Helpful One 00:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Mayur Ji! Sadar Namaskar!!

Sir I have recently created 2 articles on the above subject in Hindi as well as in English. My above article in English has been nominated by somebody for deletion. I would request you to please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Krant_M._L._Verma and put your valuable comment to save the article created by me. Since you know both the languages very well and can also plead the contents and notability of this article firmly being a senior beaurocrate. Hoping for your favourable citation in this discussion. Thanks,Awadhesh.Pandey (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mayur, I am trying to put a citation on a page but can't get the bottom part correct for the link. Can you help please? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garath_McCleary Thanks Davezo33 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Dear Mayur, It would be great if you can join us at the Delhi meetup 8 on April 8. We can discuss the GLAM possibilities at the Crafts Museum and your help will be much appreciated. Please do try to come :) Look forward to meeting you. Delhi meetup8 Noopur28 (talk) 12:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still got a little experience on the German WP and I'm still thankfullly having a second pair of eyes on my doing to help if neccessary. There are some differences between these wikipedias, most in the philosophy of review. --Hans Haase (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mayur, is it possible for you to translate this page to your native language? ●Mehran ^Debate● 16:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I LOVELOVELOVE your minimalistic, modular userpage design. Would you mind terribly if I emulated it? TheOneSean | Talk to me 22:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, offcourse, but would you mine giving me barn star for my user page ;-)--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 17:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dinesh tyagi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Faizan 17:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Userpage Barnstar
		Hey, I just want to give you credit for one of the most awesome userpages on Wikipedia. The way you have each element on its separate template page is really innovative and cool. You're awesome, TheOneSean [ U | T | C ] 18:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mayur, sorry for the edit that i did. it was mistake. (=

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Busy Moose (talk) 03:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article NATRAX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability for this test facility.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi I have provided the reference to the edit .I am not posting any argument so there is no issue on whether its constructive or not.It just information is added with reference. Dm51c (talk) 12:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the edit again: the reference to the electoral district was repeated; the other change was consistent date formats per the infobox. 187.190.167.133 (talk) 17:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as the "Best American Library of Epicness," which can be confirmed by Googling it or taking five seconds to think about whether this sounds like an actual thing or something a vandal wrote on a YA author's page for lols. 67.243.131.184 (talk) 04:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about "rm unencyclopedic trivia" don't you understand? See also: [1] 32.218.152.32 (talk) 05:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your CSD because it the assertion of notability is obvious.--Savonneux (talk) 07:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you had looked at the cast list to corroborate my change of removing Jim Ross from the page. It clearly shows Ashley Greene being in the cast. Also, can you take a look at this diff of the revision where the change was introduced and let me know if you see anything about the change that lets you know it's erroneous? Anyway, check out the IMDb page. 68.3.199.18 (talk) 07:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but can you explain why you are reverting this change? I left an explanation in both of my edit summaries and on my talk page. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with 73. The original information was sourced. The new information, which you're restoring, does not agree with the source. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent edit on List of Tokyo DisneySea attractions, to help fight back again the epidemic of spam on that and related pages. But I urge to to take greater care when undoing vandalism in the Disney pages. The vandal is quite clever, and in this case a sequence of non-consecutive edits was broken up by an edit from a different IP address, so your edit edited up reverting to a partially vandalized version, instead of a recent good version. Scott Roy Atwood (talk) 06:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 11:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		A plate of Aloo gobi for you
		Here is one plate of Aloo gobi for you. Aloo gobi is a curry made from potato and cauliflowers and it is popular in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan. Thank you. Tito Dutta (talk) 06:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply] For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

• How are you? --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 11:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mayur,

My bad I did not mean to delete any thing on Tia Mowry's page, I just noticed that Tamera Mowry's page rarely gets edited. For example: There is barely anything on her career, also for 2016 she was on "celebrity cupcake wars" and "whose line is it anyway" and both are not included on her page.

My request is to have Tamera Mowry's page updated. Thank you.Tashnat15 (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Tashnat15[reply]

• Unsure what was wrong with my updated to Valley District Cricket Club. As executive chairman of the club I am unsure what you mean by adding a citation to including the club's motto to club detail. This motto his been in place since 1900. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.23.54.100 (talk) 12:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've added a link to the news of death in the list of external links. If its not the right position please feel free to change it to the right position. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avarion (talk • contribs) 12:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wiki Nazi. I removed a link that was pretty obviously put there as advertising by a company. There are many other uses of the word Viridian, and this company is no more notable than other disambiguation references you will find to deserve a place at the top of the page. I explained the reason for the edit in the edit. The link I removed is to a company page where the company's editor is clearly using Wikipedia as advertising and protecting the page against objective edits. Please restore my edit for the greater good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.37.4.129 (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I did not make this edit (see [2]), but it is accurate. Lundgren is not a US citizen. Yours, Quis separabit? 14:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mayur! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User talk:Adamstraw99, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
• It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
• It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iwikireviewer (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ICAT LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]