User talk:Pirhayati

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating Alix Cohen.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It's not clear how this person passes NPROF.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Goldsztajn (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goldsztajn She is notable according to criteria 1 and 8 of WP:PROF. The references make it clear. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 04:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think the criteria for 1 is not demonstrated at all; three reviews of the same single decade-old text do not show "a significant impact", neither does one reply piece. Happy to concede there's a stronger argument for criteria #8, although they've only been co-editor for less than a year and "well-established" means more than just age alone. FWIW, I didn't WP:PROD the article deliberately, because my sense looking at it on face value was that it passed, however, being a stub means it is harder to reach that conclusion. I'd recommend further sourcing and expansion so that there's more conclusiveness demonstrating their significant impact (less book reviews and more engagement by others with their work) and how the BJHP is regarded as a "well-established" journal. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Helen de Hoop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 10:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pirhayati! Your additions to Kyung-Ho Min have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 23:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "Life" section you added was too closely phrased to the source. I've bolded the overlap:

"A son of a lawyer, Min grew up in Onchun, North Korea. He started his Martial Arts career in judo, practicing during junior high school and high school. Min trained in taekwondo in the military and in the Korean War served as a member of the Korean Special Services. Min was a student of physical education at Yong-In University in Seoul and continued his graduate studies at the University of Georgia. He has taught Taekwondo and Judo in the United States." Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 23:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe you started the Farsi version of Redeemer University College. In case you want to update the article, the university's name is now Redeemer University. TSventon (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mohammad Ali Besharat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 07:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating Jacob M. Held.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references for notability. As it refers to a living person, it needs to address WP:BASIC. Consider a reference for The Philosophy of Sex.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating David Jones (philosopher).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references supplied are insufficient to satisfy either of WP:BASIC (for a living person) nor WP:NACADEMIC - notability for an academic.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating Harry van der Linden.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references GIVEN are primary references. See WP:PRIMARY. These references are insufficient to satisfy either of WP:BASIC (for a living person) nor WP:NACADEMIC - notability for an academic.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating Helga Varden.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references are about this philosopher's books. See WP:PRIMARY. These references are insufficient to satisfy either of WP:BASIC (for a living person) nor WP:NACADEMIC - notability for an academic.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 01:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whiteguru Hi. It seems that you are not familiar with the notability of academics. The reviews are not "primary"; they show that the scholar has been recognized by the peers and that his/her works are important in that field. Also, she has been a "distinguished" professor which clearly shows notability according to WP:NACADEMIC. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at Glen M. Davis. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DanCherek Thank you very much. I didn't know that. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Political conflicts and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Political conflicts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 19:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Faridollah Adib Ahein".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Free University of Brussels faculty has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, David Jones (philosopher), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 01:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep Please delete the draft. I don't have time to work on it. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pirhayati: I will be in the Afc draft system for six months so you have a bit of time to work on it. It just needs more references. One per line for the career section and more for the next section. scope_creep^Talk 09:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naomi Eilan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Eilan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pirhayati: I came across this Afd when I left the message above. I was planning to add to the discussion with a clear keep. The decision at Afd was to keep this article. The article was generally updated by User:David Eppstein who added a number of book reviews, so the Afd would pass on WP:NAUTHOR, at the least. I think it is probably worth examining it to see how it passed as that may help with structuring of new article, in the future. I hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 09:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Talbot Brewer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

onel5969 Hi. I added some references and I think notability is clear now. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed this yesterday. It wasn't so much the notability of this article, but there are things reviewers look at which indicate you might have a relationship with the subject. This is strange, coming from such a long-standing editor as yourself, but I have to ask, do you know Brewer? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

onel5969 Yes this is really strange. I know Brewer through his works. After I created the page, I emailed him and asked him to send me an unpublished photo, noting that I will be the copyright-holder. I have done this before for other philosophers. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense then. I've moved it back to mainspace. Keep up the good work. Always a pleasure interacting with you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pirhayati! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Catherine Best, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/marcs/our_team/researchers/professor_catherine_best, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Catherine Best and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Catherine Best, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Catherine Best. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Catherine Best with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Catherine Best saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I think this is a case of inadvertent copyvio. The site you copied from has the appropriate CC language, but they might not have the right to use that CC language. The professor's university page, which is copyrighted, also has the same language. I've left the above template only because it's required. Hence this more personal message. Sorry to disturb you twice in such a short time, but I figured I'd let the good folks who know a lot more about copyright issues deal with it. I had a brief discussion with an admin who does a lot of copyvio work, which you can find at User talk: Diannaa#Catherine Best. Again, if this is a true copyvio, I firmly believe that it was completely inadvertent on your part, as your citation of orcid.org show. All the best. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 Thank you for your inquiry about the issue. Never mind. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewing administrator in this subject field, I'm very pleased to see your work on anthropologists.and other faculty. Bu please try to make them at least a little fuller atthe very beginning, in order to avoid their nomination for deletion b y people who do not understand their importance. t

At the very start, include:

1. the basic biography, (education and sequence of positions) with a good reference, which can be their cv. 2. evidence to show their notability -- even ift hey hold a named chair, which of course does show notability under WP:PROF, include a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of the books; and (in the sciences) the 5 or so most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them from Google Scholar of Scopus or ISI. 3. Add any national lebel awards,

If you need help in defending such articles, just notify me on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 10:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DGG Hi. Thank you. Well I have tried to add these as far as I could. One problem is that some database websites are inaccessible (due to sanctions or filtration?) in Iran. I know it's weird, but even VIAF is not accessible. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can you get Google Scholar, and Worldcat? don't be concerned about ading VIAF and other identification numbers, there are people 9and bots) that go through and add them. DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DGG I have access to Google Scholar, but both VIAF and Worldcat are inaccessible. I sometimes add VIAF through ISNI (if they are linked). Ali Pirhayati (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammad Seddiq Zhakfar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drown (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drown (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ali Shariati has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Helen de Hoop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jochen Büchs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 20:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohammad Seddiq Zhakfar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Ji11720 (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohammad Seddiq Zhakfar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cheryl Zoll, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might be going too fast to be careful. Consider Alexander Myller. The only source you included in the article pointed to another mathematician entirely. Better to slow down and make sure you get it right so others don't have to clean up errors behind you. agtx 22:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agtx The source does not have to be precisely about the subject. The source I provided clearly shows the significance of the subject and can be used in the entry: "... join the studies of the school of geometry in Iasi led by the academicians Al. Myller and O. Mayer. These results were intensely quoted by famous mathematicians..." Ali Pirhayati (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right, so that's WP:SYNTH. It doesn't support the sentence you cited it for, which was "He is known for his substantial contributions to Differential Geometry." The page you cited said that Popa was known for those contributions, and you extended it to Myller. Again, just slow down a little bit and make sure your statements and citations are accurate. Creating lots of low-quality stubs with errors isn't really helpful. agtx 04:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agtx There is no "errors". In worst case, it is a correct sentence without a source. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on Michael M. T. Henderson - keep it up! Meatsgains(talk) 14:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cheryl Zoll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ali Akbar Saboury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 21:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pbrks Hi. Distinguished professors are clearly notable according to WP:Academic. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 01:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, they are. Please provide a reliable source to support that claim. His personal website is not such a source. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 01:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pbrks This is the public announcement of his rank on UT's website. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 01:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be an appropriate source to have in the article to demonstrate notability. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the source. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 02:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghawgha Taban, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You say that notability is evident, but if it was, I wouldn't have tagged it. To save us the hassle of an AFD, perhaps you can indicate how this person meets WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG? --Randykitty (talk) 13:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Randykitty Hi. No, I prefer AFD. You are constantly (and wrongly) undoing my edits and this is not helpful. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 14:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• You'll have to give your arguments in an AFD in any case, so why not convince me now and be done with it? --Randykitty (talk) 14:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Convincing is based on a (relatively) common mentality. We don't have this. I have tried before and it was a failure. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Jones (philosopher), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammad Ali Besharat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pirhayati an article you recently created, Arzoo Osanloo, is not suitable as written to remain published. As the article is now the subject isn't notable, but I do believe they might be with some additional work. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 23:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luigi Ferrucci, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghawgha Taban".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating David Ingram (linguist).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for this! I'd maybe look for a few more references that help demonstrate David passes WP:NACADEMIC and also add a project tag on the article's talk page?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Festschrift shows notability according to WP:NACADEMIC. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 06:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Shen-En Chen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to establish notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 23:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any objections to merging philosophy of death into philosophy of life? I suppose they are subtly different, but as both articles are fairly short I think it's okay to treat them together. If the death section becomes too big it can always be moved out. Ovinus (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have book-length studies of philosophy of death and both topics are expandable enough. I think merging is not a good idea. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 19:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cyrus Cooper, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've moved this into drafts, because a single source, once cited, is nowhere near enough to verify even a short stub like this. It also cannot establish notability, and even if the person is notable by some means other than GNG — eg. NACADEMIC — we need to see reliable sources to corroborate that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Abdolhadi Haeri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jochen Büchs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati,

Thank you for creating Conduct: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for this article on an interesting book. However, I don't think the current sources are sufficient to establish notability. Ref 1 covers the author in one page, but only trivially mentions the book in one sentence (it's also listed in the bibliography of the author), and is inadequate to count as WP:SIGCOV per GNG or a non-trivial per WP:NBOOK criteria 1. However, ref 2 is a full review that counts as one source towards GNG or NBOOK criteria 1. Nevertheless, multiple sources are required, unfortunately, my search did not find sources, however, given the book's age there are probably JSTOR/Proquest refs, if you could provide more refs it would be great!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Selim Berker, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to be expanded to show how the subject satisfies academic notability. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luigi Ferrucci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arzoo Osanloo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shen-En Chen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Parmenides has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shen-En Chen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyrus Cooper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about sovereignty has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cyrus Cooper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdolhadi Haeri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Daryl Koehn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Selim Berker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about intellectuals has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 21:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Selim Berker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luigi Ferrucci".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and is too reliant on primary sources. Secondary sources are required for a topic to pass WP:GNG. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Figure/Ground is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Figure/Ground until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 20:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Broken Hegemonies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Institute for Hermeneutics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Institute for Hermeneutics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RetroCosmos ^{t • c} 15:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Victor Caston. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:BLP seems to be selling the book and no real sources. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 17:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amirhossein Sahebkar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He has many citations but most of them are co-authored with many people (see Google scholar) and it is unclear how significant his contributions actually are. The page does not mention any particular significant contribution. The only non-primary reference is a list of people with the most citations where he was placed 2843rd. The list is not live, but it is archived).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bendegúz Ács (talk) 10:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amirhossein Sahebkar, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirhossein Sahebkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Quran News Agency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Quran News Agency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Koopinator (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Giorgio Agamben has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Books by Giorgio Agamben has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Leo Strauss has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Theodor W. Adorno has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Cicero has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grammarians of Persian has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Broken Hegemonies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Publons awards recipients indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Phonologists from the United States has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Broken Hegemonies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victor Caston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Catherine Lord (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Review of Islamic Studies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:NJOURNAL, a database entry is not sufficient to show notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Mask of Enlightenment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

At best, this belongs on Rosen's main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kakurokuna (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Victor Caston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Abolghasem Jouyban. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 00:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Professorships in theology has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maurice Gex. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 06:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No it does not need more sources. The library holdings show notability according to WP:Prof. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having works in a library does not make the academic notable per se. Please see WP:NACADEMIC. ... discospinster _talk 22:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does: claims of impact must be substantiated by independent statements, reviews, citation metrics, or library holdings, and so on. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have to show that many libraries hold this person's works, which the article currently does not do. ... discospinster _talk 17:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was shown through "authority control" which was observable when the article was in the main space. The number of libraries is much more that enough. Besides, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article." Ali Pirhayati (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not up to the reader to go searching for the sources. Besides, when I look him up in World Cat, his books don't seem to be in all that many libraries. ... discospinster _talk 20:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not up to the reader; it's up to the admin to be aware of notability criteria and check them before tagging the article. The library holdings are observable in his Wikidata page. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 03:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did check and in my opinion he does not meet the notability criteria for WP:NACADEMIC. However, if there are sources I did not find you can add them so that the article will not be deleted. Feel free to get another opinion. ... discospinster _talk 03:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May you please send the article to Afd so we can get other opinions? Ali Pirhayati (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]