User talk:Sceptre/Archive 33

Can't you just let it go five past, and then leave those five for the next archive, like I do? ;) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  18:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot you move yours…you could just copy+paste them after you move, though? —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  23:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like it very much. —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  23:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Her font? What's wrong with it? (And do you mean you e-mailed me or you want me to e-mail you?) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  05:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I was just about to comment on that. Thank you for the note. Biruitorul (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for opening this RfAr, if I had a barnstar I would give it to you for straightforward action. -- AdrianTM (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the GA review of Chat Moss, particularly as you saw fit to pass it. :) --Malleus Fatuarum (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those images took me ages, they were better quality and showed better progression of narrative. Why have you changed EVERYTHING that I contributed? What's the point in that, I ask you? Am I even using this right? User:Queeq 01:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What, where and how is POV pushing? You obviously have to have your reasons and explanations for your assumed POV pushing. I'm ready to hear you. Mulţam'--Cezarika f. (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article said quite clear that Moldovans are identical with Romanians. I can speak Romanian and I see no difference between "Moldovan" and Romanian.--Mulţam'--Cezarika f. (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about it, but I wasn't sure how to do it. Am I supposed to be invited, or can I simply sign in under "Involved parties", and then confirm I am aware of the request? Sorry if this sounds a bit silly or naive, but I haven't been really involved in any RfA before -- it's not something I enjoy doing (I rather go my merry way editing), but sometimes a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do. :) Turgidson (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know you were the creator of the cats. Anyway, incase you are not aware,

Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 17:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simply south (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the ultimate judge of what should go into a Wikipedia article. I have expanded the section on rugby league somewhat. Everything is referenced and there is nothing that could be called "POV". If you can't live with the addition of a sentence or two then I suggest you take it to dispute resolution or request for comment.GordyB (talk) 11:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or have you heard about it?--CJ King (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was just alerted on my talk page that the discussion was started by a banned user. So sorry for reverting you and I support your re-deleting it as trolling. I incorrectly thought it was a good faith but misguided notice, in which case it would be better to preserve somehow for the record in case the issue or the people involved ever came up again. Cheers, Wikidemo (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you related to my evil organization in any way? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am Donald Pleasance's Blofeld who Dr Evil is based on. In fact in this picture he looks a little like Gail Porter. Not Charles Gray who played him with hair!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 21:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Noticed your work on these. Should we code the line break into it as it is only used in the infobox? Regan123 (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Anonimu/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Anonimu/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, David Mestel^(Talk) 18:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the {{ukroadsmall}} template must have been amended before and since I did my "tidying up" of various road infoboxes, or there was some sort of glitch - they were displaying really badly, with the icons in white unformatted boxes, as if preceded by a space,and looked OK (like they do now) when I'd finished. Thanks for clearing up various roads I've inadvertently mssed up. PamD (talk) 18:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now spotted remark above about line breaks. If it's coded into the template it's difficult to add a comment/alternative name for a road, such as the 2 ringroads in A660_road - where I now see the M58 doesn't work, while it did yesterday! Aaargh! (Actually I think I "subst"ed the template in order to fiddle the ring road note into it) PamD (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thought: how about an optional parameter to allow for a comment or name for the road (eg "Opening 2008", as well as "Leeds Outer Ring Road")? PamD (talk) 08:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"it's not impactural, just a note of interest". A song by a group or artist inspired by the M62 is considered impactural; however a book by a writer inspired by the M62 isn't.... that's not consistent; please explain your reasoning. Johndavies.liverpool (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...do you wiki-stalk me in that TARDIS of yours? K. Lásztocska^talk 16:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't have anything agaisnt your blog - it's an iteresting read. What I mean is that there's really no indication that the M62 had an impact - you could've walked the M6, M4, M53, whereas with the rugby, and the songs, the M62 has had some impact (such as John Shuttleworth's and Kathryn William's songs both directly refer to the farm).

Yes, I could have walked another road ... but I didn't, I walked the M62 ... HOME ... two indications of an 'impact' there, or I would say a sense of importance to me... And yes those songs refer to the farm. If you read the book / blog you'll see I spent a whole day there with the farmer... Johndavies.liverpool (talk) 00:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping an eye on the articles he was vandalising. I have to go offline for a bit, but leave me a message if needs be and I'll be happy to block any of his WP:ATTACK crew who turn up in the meantime. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You made this edit as you said it was vandalism. I'm just wondering how this is so? --Fuelboy (talk) 20:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, looks like this one was ok, so i'll go back and check it. --Fuelboy (talk) 12:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm feeling obnoxious, snarky, sarcastic, and all that good stuff today—can you tell? :P By the way I'm still dosing…will probably drop off to sleep all the way soon. (/Will says "yeah right you've made an edit a day the last three days since you blanked your page" :P) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  04:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the barnstar, the message, and the sentiment. Much obliged. Durova^Charge! 14:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you've got me--what on Earth are those imperial-looking eagles on the top of this page, and what are they saying? K. Lásztocska^talk 05:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... who appreciates refined English. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And this one? Phwoar! :) ~ Riana ⁂ 16:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just reading that! Although I read 'Wikipedos' first and made Shaggy's 'Zoinks' noise in my head :s ~ Riana ⁂ 16:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on the promotion. Hopefully London congestion charge will not be far behind! Regan123 (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

…that we will have to not drink together. :P Enjoy it anyway. ;) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  15:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:42 (Doctor Who).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Labeling the reverts as vandalism is really inappropriate, regardless of the motive. Corvus cornix_talk 21:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that for a moment. Vandalism is all intent. Corvus cornix_talk 21:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]