User talk:Glic16

Welcome!

Hello, Glic16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Ernst & Young. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rlendog (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of your edits, the article on Ivana Bacik is seriously unbalanced, contrary to the policy that a neutral point of view is a fundamental Wikimedia principle and a cornerstone of Wikipedia.

See a more detailed explanation at Talk:Ivana_Bacik#Unbalanced. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit to the B&Q article. To avoid a revert war I will not reverse your actions just yet. As explained in my edit summary I removed your contributions because they were not really relevant to the article, ultimately the death of a couple of people will probably not even make it into B&Q's overall history as a foot note. WP has a sister project, wikinews, where your contributions may be more relevant. The deaths your edits refer to are not really noteworthy, people die all the time, and unless it's under particularly odd circumstances it doesn't warrent inclusion, being hit on the head doesn't constitute noteworthy circumstances. I will leave your edit as it is for a couple of days while I await a reply. Also, for future reference, if an editor explains their actions to you, please have the decency to extend the same courtesy. RaseaC (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the image you added to the Tesco Ireland article isn't related to the topic so I had to remove it. I however thank you for the work you put into the article and I know that you had good intentions. FF3000 · talk 20:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand why inserted the rat image, but there is nothing in the text about rodents. It is just simply a picture of a rat. It would be best to first write about it, with a reference to prove it. Also, try to find an image that is directly related to Tesco's bad hygeine, instead of showing a picture of a rat from somewhere else. Thank you. And come on the Reds! FF3000 · talk 20:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Garda 40,

The images I contributed are both relevant and in the proper context. On reflection I will however delete the picture of the meeting which could be identified with another subject.Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Generic images are not relevant especially so the one of the meeting and replacing it with an equally irrelevant picture is no improvement .

I also have seen that you, without comment or justification, have deleted a reference to a Senate Debate during the week which was followed by an excellent commentary in the Sunday Independent newspaper. Wiki users should,for the sake of compleness,see the sentence that I inserted

I might have removed it without comment ( while removing the pictures ) but certainly with justification over POVing Garda40 (talk) 21:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. WP:IMAGES states, "Images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly related to the article's topic." The four images I removed were a generic microphone, a picture of a cat watching television, a generic picture of the European Parliament, and some footballers. I fail to see how any of these pictures is relevant to RTÉ or how they contribute to understanding of the topic. I left in the financial graphs, the pictures of RTÉ's Montrose campus and the NSO, as these are all directly related to RTÉ and directly illustrate the accompanying text. If you feel that the article could do with more images, then find or make some that bring something to the article; Wikipedia is not indiscriminate. --Kwekubo (talk) 01:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ww2censor (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were two problems with your addition of the issue about the website and Ireland: 1. It is copied verbatim directly from the news story, which breaches guidelines against plagiarism. 2. It presents the issue in POV language, e.g. "the ultimate 'up yours'". If you can source this better and word it more neutrally, it might have a place in the article. Fences&Windows 16:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop breaking NPOV by including only part of RTÉ's director general comments to the various articles you have added it to Garda40 (talk) 20:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it is not a "very marginal call" to include only one part of a statement that adds a POV slant to an article and leave out the end of the statement that rebalances it to NPOV . Also you kept doing it after my clear edit summaries and having sent you a message which even further diminishes your assessment of it as a "very marginal call" .Garda40 (talk) 20:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well to answer it in your terms they did not disagree with his statement and any false information that he might have given will be revealed in two years time .That won't help RTE in the long term .

I removed the comments because I felt at the time they didn't add much more to the article .As I encountered more of your edits I then changed my position to add in the full DG's statement .

Trying not to come across as rude, but the only people that regard your amendments as neutral are RTE who are issuing spin to justify their serious commercial mistakes in paying excessive salaries. Lets stick to facts and leave out excuses for obvious errors.

And including only one part of a statement is POVing .And it's interesting to notice that you regard one part of the DG's statement as 'Fact' but the other part , which you kept leaving out isn't a 'Fact' . That is not your decision to make . Garda40 (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite reverting twice and requests to leave it as I named it despite the title not being libellous or insulting I am pointing out the above title of this section is not as I named it .Garda40 (talk) 18:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure when writing about RTÉ, that you use the fada on the É. Thanks,  Cargoking  talk  18:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are not willing to respect my decision to call the above item NPOV and insist on renaming it RTE Salaries .

It is considered wrong on Wikepedia to edit other peoples comments against their will unless they are libellous or grossly personally insulting .

As the comment above is neither it is sad to see you go the route of editing the title .Garda40 (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since pages I edit automatically get added to my watchlist I noticed your edit on Saa19952 page and just in case pages you edit don't automatically get added to your watchlist I am posting my message that I added on Saa19952's talk page here for you to see .

The only edits I deleted of Skreen were edits where he inserted generic pictures of objects into articles where mention was made of such object and I wasn't the only one to object to such generic images [1].

I edited other contributions of Skreen for inserting POV language and again was not the only one with such concerns .[2] . Garda40 (talk) 19:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your great support and what you do garda40 copy to the two of truth, justice must be done and not done and thanks for giving me your friendship, another user is accusing me and not because Sockpuppetry. Saa19952 (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks to you Glic16 for the Barnstar - much appreciated! Sarah777 (talk) 10:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay - didn't see your note until now! Tvoz/talk 18:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, Glic16! At this time of year, I would like to extend seasons greetings to the Wikipedians I have interacted with in the past year on Wikipedia. I wish you a wonderful holiday season! --Footyfanatic3000 (talk  · contribs)

Thanks for the appreciation and barnstar. Let me know if you need any more help / photos. DubhEire (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, where are you getting those images of Irish politicians from? If they are taken from copyrighted images on the internet, then they will be deleted by the image police! Snappy (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as long as you can keep the image police at bay then. One minor point when inserting them can you put them in the infobox, and also in the infobox, use the following:

| image =Paschal Donohoe.jpg | imagesize =250px

The image parameter for the file name only, don't use File: in front of it or the size. The imagesize param for the size in px. Rgds, Snappy (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'd placed the hatnote is for disambiguation: so someone wanting "financial regulator," in the general sense, could get to the right article. It seems conceivable that someone searching for the general usage could easily wind up at Financial Regulator. --Pnm (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit on 8th July, you added the statement that "Fexco bought the Company in June 2010 for €20 million and will try to cut costs at by using its Kerry-based outsourcing staff to carry out administrative functions at the broker." This statement is not factually correct (as of the end of July, Goodbody Stockbrokers is owned by Allied Irish Bank) and the supporting articles do not state this definitively, but rather suggest that a deal may be imminent based on information from unnamed sources. For the purpose of clarity and accuracy, you may want to edit your statement to properly reflect the cited source articles. Roadkilliest (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skreen, I only saw your message now (new to Wikipedia). I am not contesting that Goodbody Stockbrokers may or may not be sold in the future - simply that your edits state as fact that the stockbrokers was sold in June 2010 to Fexco. This is factually incorrect as the stockbrokers is still owned by Allied Irish Banks. Based on the resources you cited, what that text should be stating is that it is rumored that Fexco are in negotiations to purchase the stockbrokers from Allied Irish Banks. There is nothing in those articles that states that the sale is completed, nor are there any supporting articles on the web since then confirming such a sale. Given that Allied Irish Banks is a publicly listed company, if a sale was completed then there would definitely be column inches on the web stating that fact. Just wanting to keep things accurate. ;) Roadkilliest (talk) 08:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I reverted this edit of yours on Michael Fingleton. I'm not a Fingleton fan, just trying to maintain BLP guidelines. My feeling is that to introduce something like that into the article it would need to be substantially better sourced than what looks like a blog. GainLine ♠ _♥ 16:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, I'm no fan of Michael Fingletons, there's nothing that I would like to see more than him sharing a cell with Sean Fitzpatrick. I started the page and then got refused a DYK for it becaue it was negative. The revert was purely on Wikipedia policy basis. If you can find a reliable source for that please feel free to reintroduce it. I've come across your edits too, you seem like a good solid editor, keep up the goood work! GainLine ♠ _♥ 20:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're happy then bang it back up. I asked for input at the RS noticeboard with a view to restoring your original edit. GainLine ♠ _♥ 21:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that's in now, I moved it further up the article. That article is one of the refs that I originaly used, dunno how I missed it but I was browned off enough by the time I finished. GainLine ♠ _♥ 10:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary was criticism of Financial Regulator not asking for any controls on banks .

What you added in your edit was In 2009 he said his decision in 2001 to create the Financial Regulator was one of the main reasons for the collapse of the Irish banking sector and“if I had a chance again I wouldn’t do it”

That is not a criticism of a Financial Regulator not asking for any controls on banks but a general criticism of a Financial Regulator in general

The quote you added doesn't support your edit summary therefore I reverted your edit with the summary edit summary does not conform to what was added. .

So you either need to get a quote that does support your edit summary or change your edit summary to what that quote you added actually says . Garda40 (talk) 20:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...although I didn't do much about your page - that was earlier in the morning. (I did have a bit of a fight with the mouse, and Favonian sorted MY page out.) I will accept the barnstar for anti-spam, however. I did have another one for something but it seems to have got lost somewhere. (I'll look after this one...) I tend to get more hate than anything. Doesn't worry me, it coming from where it usually does. I just take it as a sign that messages are getting through. I'm finding less spam these days. Mean as Custard and a couple of others are pouncing on it before I get there. They've working the Userpage area that seemed to be rather neglected before I found it. Peridon (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Skreen/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Belatedly acknowledging your 'Barnstar', to be honest I wasn't sure what to make of it, not just that I feel undeserving, there is still so much to do and review again, but to call my contributions 'humongous' I found a bit strange, after clicking on it. I added a dictionary definition if that is what you mean, but would like to modify it to 'considerable' contributions. If the award was genuinely intended, then many many thanks. Greetings Osioni (talk) 18:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Chzz  ►  18:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Central Bank of Ireland. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:35, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Glic16, thank you so much for your comment on my pic of the Central bank :)--Doyler79 (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC) Doyler79 (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Tesco has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Greensax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted your edit at Augustus Saint-Gaudens it went like this:

It was felt he heavily influenced the other world renowned Irish American sculptor Jerome Connor.

A statement such as that needs to be referenced. possibly you can easily do that and put your phrase back. Also, I am one of those editors who does not like phrases such as "Irish-American", "Italian-American" "German-American" etc. St. Gaudens is described as being 'Irish Born" and that is fine. But for folks who came to American at a young age and were educated in their craft after arriving here, they are just Americans. So mull it over and I'm sure that we will be in touch again. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 02:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That Connor spent the last 20 years of his life living and working in Ireland pretty much (another opinion of mine) qualifies him as being "Irish American." Assuming that he is American at all. I didn't notice that in your link, tho I was not looking for it. I think I'll revert my reversion of your edit. Carptrash (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere thanks for the gesture and kind words. RashersTierney (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very much appreciated, thank you...Modernist (talk) 01:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good cheer --JimWae (talk) 04:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar. Exiledone (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Chris de Burgh as I believe that it implied that the defamation actions were taken by the subject of the article and not his daughter. I also note that I beleive she does not use the name de Burgh. No offence was intended, I am just rather cautious where defamation is concerned.FrankFlanagan (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Glic16,

many apologies, I misread the article. Having re-read the article and the Irish Times article of last Saturday, please feel free to put the edit back.

FrankFlanagan (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't watch my User page that much and just discovered the BarnStar that you awarded me. I am very pleased, thank you so much. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I've only just seen this. I'm quite surprised and very honoured. Thank you very much. I will wear it with absolute pride. --RA (talk) 22:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! Thank you very much! Jdorney (talk) 10:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just looked at this rather nice newly expanded page and it is very interesting. However, I hope you don't mind me pointing something out - several sentences in the article were taken directly from one of the cited articles in the Irish Time. If you are going to include direct quotations from another source, they have to be in quotation marks, so that it is clear who originally wrote them. All the best, ComhairleContaeThirnanOg (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tá fáilte romhat! ComhairleContaeThirnanOg (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Phoenix Park, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waterloo and Robert Smirke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies about undoing your edit! Just seemed a little far fetched. Very few large famalies out there! Finnegas (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Guardian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligent Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ECB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McGrath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luke 'Ming' Flanagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecstasy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Just a friendly message to be careful about "criticism" sections. Your edit said that in February 2013 Tesco staff were made to wear armbands monitoring productivity. It was a news report about an employee claim -- It's referenced so that's fine but you should make clear that it's a claim clear, as opposed to a fact. Mark83 (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see my edits to James Larkin, to see how references are formatted and used more than once. Thanks, Snappy (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulysses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please try and avoid wp:bare URL. This edit is not how we format citations on Wikipedia. — Blue-Haired Lawyer ^t 00:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Bank of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 4 months earlier<ref>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0727/breaking64.html></ref> "failed to convince financial markets"<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.
• arrears-figures-dont-give-full-picture-30067510.html| work=Irish Independent | date=6 March 2014}}</</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Bank of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Club]] .<ref>|title=ESCAPE ARTIST SUPREME |work=The Irish Independent|date=25 November 2012}}</http://www.independent.ie/unsorted/features/escape-artist-supreme-26310371.html</ref>
• bank-s-mortgage-code-on-side-of-the-lender-1.1715408| work=Irish Times | date=7 March 2014}}</</ref><ref>http://www.flac.ie/download/pdf/redressing_the_imbalance.pdf</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Davy Group may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• awarded €2.1m over stockbroker Davy's 'deliberate neglect'|publisher=RTE|access date=2014-04-09{{cite http://www.rte.ie/news/business/2014/0409/607880-davy-client-court/</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Davy Group may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• former billionaire however.<ref>McNamara unable to pay €62.5m to investors. RTE 13 January 2010 {{cite web|url=http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0113/126304-mcnamarab/</ref>
• awarded €2.1m over stockbroker Davy's 'deliberate neglect'|publisher=RTE|access date=2014-04-09{{cite http://www.rte.ie/news/business/2014/0409/607880-davy-client-court/</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Bank of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

4 months earlier<ref>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0727/breaking64.html></ref> "failed to convince financial markets"<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.belfasttelegraph.co. least two occasions by the Department of Finance over difficulties with copyright and design.<ref>{{cite news| http://www.herald.ie/news/bank-alerted-to-joyce-coin-risk-29296231.html | work= Evening bank-s-mortgage-code-on-side-of-the-lender-1.1715408| work=Irish Times | date=7 March 2014}}</</ref><ref>http://www.flac.ie/download/pdf/redressing_the_imbalance.pdf</ref> A Central Bank-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sterling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Bank of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

forced to bail out Ireland because of the wider threat to the rest of the [[European Union]].<ref>>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/banking-inquiry/irish-bank-crisis-couldve- 4 months earlier<ref>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0727/breaking64.html></ref> "failed to convince financial markets"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ //www.irishtimes.com/news/consumer/central-bank-s-mortgage-code-on-side-of-the-lender-1.1715408</</ref><ref>http://www.flac.ie/download/pdf/redressing_the_imbalance.pdf</ref> A Central Bank-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Bank of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

tests were "not stressful enough" — two years before the collapse of the Irish banking system.<ref>>{{cite news|url=http://www.irishexaminer.com/world/mhkfcwkfojsn/rss2/|title=Bank officials in 2006 4 months earlier<ref>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0727/breaking64.html></ref> "failed to convince financial markets"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ //www.irishtimes.com/news/consumer/central-bank-s-mortgage-code-on-side-of-the-lender-1.1715408</</ref><ref>http://www.flac.ie/download/pdf/redressing_the_imbalance.pdf</ref> A Central Bank-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Bank of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clandestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central Bank of Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

<!--DO NOT add info on currency, rates, printer or mints, as these are controlled by ECB (the infobox is referring to the Central Bank part, which has released full control to ECB --> //www.irishtimes.com/news/consumer/central-bank-s-mortgage-code-on-side-of-the-lender-1.1715408</</ref><ref>http://www.flac.ie/download/pdf/redressing_the_imbalance.pdf</ref> A Central Bank- Payments in Public Sector Bodies |work= Comptroller and Auditor General |date= 23 December 2015}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]