User talk:THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

This user may have left Wikipedia. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? has not edited Wikipedia since April 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

File:Mr Blobby.jpg

Archives

Welcome!

Hi THEN WHO WAS PHONE?, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. --Paragon12321 (talk) 21:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YOUR WARNINGS TO ME

User talk:59.100.3.101 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]March 2009

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Online flower delivery. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 07:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Online flower delivery, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

TO: THEN WHO WAS PHONE this link is NOT spam and it is NOT advertising. It is a legitimate link that provides facts to warn the public about scammers that operate as Online Relay Florists. As such it is a matter of PUBLIC INTEREST and as such the activities published at my PRIVATE Fair Trading site are reported to the appropriate authorities that include the Police and the ACCC. Please provide your name and address and contact email if you wish to continue with correspondence. SIGNED Gordon Craven, 63 Nandroya Road Cooroy QLD 4563 gordon@gordoncraven.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.3.101 (talk) 10:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for

On February 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article [[]], which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for

On February 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article [[]], which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boy, nothing like the personal touch :P ^Law_shoot! 02:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

heh I think it sends quite a poignant message about DYK THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[[]] is really compelling stuff. I really enjoyed the lead. ^Law_shoot! 02:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You like that? Well then you should read one of my many FA's, I suggest starting with [[]], [[]], or [[]]. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 02:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Jackson

They don't appear to be the same person. Are you sure? — neuro^(talk) 02:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your message got truncated, but yeah, looks convincing. Adding the info about him being FRS and such and redirecting now. — neuro^(talk) 02:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question

Do you want me to delete your userpage? I could set it [create=autoconfirmed] too, if you want. That would allow you to create it if you want, and at the same time, most vandals would be unable to. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you mind if I was to redirect your userpage to this page? I can ask J.delanoy if he can set it to [edit=autoconfirmed].--O'delaquatique (talk) (contributions) (email) 12:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EPIC

LOL barnstar faggot? o man. obviously a disgruntled wikipedian who never received such a prestigious honor. awesome name for an Amish/emo band.^Law_shoot! 03:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

heh that edit did make me laugh. It goes well with the uw-gay3 I received yesterday. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 03:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. I totally laughed out loud. That is so funny. I guess if you're gay, the punishment is a cock-block. I'd help you with the vandals but I'm busy trying to justify why I'm writing articles about every bar I've visited in the last week. ^Law_shoot! 03:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw Tilted Kilt a few hours ago and was dissapointed by the lack of images, but I see you've rectified that now! THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 03:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course - it was necessary. You don't go to Hooters cuz the sandwiches are sooo tasty, right? I went there last night with a couple of gals, which makes it just even weirder. ^Law_shoot! 04:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D:

Did you at least appreciate the humor? That was a quick revert... 67.55.70.4 (talk) 00:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Wasn't it protected from evil? Maybe you should just give in and make it like a MySpace - give the people what they want. ^Law_shoot! 00:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only from the first wave of evil, but I have now accepted my blue destiny. A few too many of my edits were being reverted since I went red, so it maybe for the best. I don't think I could go myspacy, but then again, I swore I would never have a userbox. Thanks for tidying it up before. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are varying degrees of credibility when it comes to editing. IP, regged user with red page, regged user with blue page, admin. The higher up, the less likely you are to get reverted, unfortunately! That userbox is a bit over the top. Now I know you are either from California, Wisconsin, or have access to a grocery store. You need to be more careful with your private data. ^Law_shoot! 00:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of the Day

EOTD ^Law_shoot! 00:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What a shame Pparazorback warned him, I'd have loved to have seen what else he would have come up with. How about this as a candidate for edit summary of last month. I can just imagine some dude stumbling across the page and yelling it out loud at his computer screen. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 06:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bumper sticker material. "It's God, not Goatse." ^Law_shoot! 07:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J.C. Bloem

Thanks for cleaning up after me! Can't believe I spent so much time writing a stub without noticing these obvious errors and omissions. Drmies (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

heh people are cleaning up after me all the time ... about time I gave a little back, and it's easy for a second set of eyes to spot things. Although I'm bound to have missed something in there :D. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 15:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Someone messed mine up and you fixed it. You turned out to be a great editor and wiki-pal as well :) ^Law_shoot! 05:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But I must say, if he had done it to your redesigned user page I would have had second thoughts with those colors lol. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 08:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have had time to think about your actions, I have re-gifted you this barnstar. Haha! I like the colors on my userpage. They are pretty neat. ^Law_shoot! 23:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I liked my struckthrough RickK barnstar, I though you were going all abstract to match those colors! THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 23:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice userpage, punk! ^Law_shoot! 00:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having far too much fun with that. I may be tempted to go myspacy THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting that abuse from my talk page while I was offline, I really appreciate it. Cheers! :) Versus22_talk 16:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, my pleasure to help :) THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir

This user thinks PHONE is a pretty cool cat. He is an hero.

We need a subpage for this stuff

What do you think of this? I hate to laugh at this stuff, but sometimes it is impossible not to. ^Law_shoot! 02:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL laughing is OK as long as you don't feel bad for having removed it ... given how much creativity and effort the dood put in to it. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 23:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are wasting their talent here and should be at ED. ^Law_shoot! 04:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your webpage supplier sucks. ^Law_shoot! 03:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid Userpage

With all due respect, you have one of the stupidest userpages I have ever seen. It's a complete waste of time. E. Novachek (talk) 17:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free not to look at it. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 17:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That comment was completely unacceptable. I really don't understand why someone would feel compelled to leave such an incivil opinion. If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it, right? ^Law_shoot! 00:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

... or he could expend some creativity to word his opinion in a fashion that makes me laugh. This still cracks me up. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That comment reminds me of those poor translations that occur between Asian languages and English. What do you suppose the bottom line was? You suck? WP sucks? We all suck? ^Law_shoot! 01:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have no idea what the actual intent was. I love the ambiguity in it ... have spent far too much time trying to figure it out. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 02:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need to know what it means! ^Law_shoot! 10:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come on you guys (people)! It's obvious what it means - The entity who provided for the supply of this webpage sucks (ahem, male genitalia). I think. Or, perhaps it means something much more deeper than that.

Now, I'm starting to get confused with what I originally thought was a clear understanding that I had. Nevermind. Hey, regardless, thanks for the brightening of my day with this entertainment on one of my quite infrequent visits to behind the scenes WikiP! I also like cheese. Tim Sailor (talk) 15:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I had known it was going to make such a stew, I never would haave said it. Anyway, there's only one meaning to it: it's really quite self-explanatory. E. Novachek (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It goes without saying that you are free to comment on any aspect of my editing activities. The derisive nature of your choice of words was the only point of issue. Loss of constructive editors because of an unpleasant editing environment being created though the exchange of uncivil words happens far to often, so people will come down hard and quickly on perceived incivility issues. That you have been made aware of that by a handful of editors would indicate that this is now a non-issue. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 08:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, after a brief exchange I think this might be resolved. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 10:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the point is that the OP did not need to speak at all. ^Law_shoot! 13:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for saying anything in the first place. Obviously, you have the right to feature anything you choose on your userpage. I was simply annoyed that I had vistied your userpage, expecting to see who you are, why you're here, etc., and I had found a relatively uninformative page. I'm sorry, and I should have expressed myself in a more civil manner. By the way, I have friends who live in Wisconsin, so I know what eating cheese is all about. What I really wanted was to find out was the origin of your username. If you reply, please do so on my talk page. You'll find the link on my signature. If I remember to sign, that is... E. Novachek (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Huck2012[reply]

Would it be wrong to describe your userpage as being cheesy? ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not 4Chan

... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.52.12 (talk) 10:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

short edit is very short 17:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Your userpage

I acidentally your userpage. --DFS454 (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it needed moar smileys, at least 9000. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't mess with this userpage. PHONE is an hero. He lieks mudkips as well. ^Law_shoot! 13:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hai thar. Are you admin yet? THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 13:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am still trying to figure out 'transclusion.' Is that a real word? I accidentally RfA. ^Law_shoot! 10:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script

Hi THEN WHO WAS PHONE?,

I have to let you know on your talk page that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.

Regards Lightmouse (talk) 22:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zola Levitt

My bad, dawg. I totally dig.

Holla back, Vesuvius13 (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Poshard

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Glenn Poshard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ian Weller (talk) 02:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you have good intentions, but I'm dumbfounded by this warning. 3RR does not apply to reverting vandalism, and it does not apply to removing BLP-violating edits. [1], [2], [3], [4].THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

WikiThanks

I'd like to thank you for your vandalism fighting on List of D.Gray-man characters while I was not able to attend to it myself. Thank you so very much! ~Itzjustdrama ^{? C} 15:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship?

I know you previously declined to be nominated for the sysop flag, but your anti-vandalism work has been first-class and I think you would be a very good admin. Would you consider running? Stifle (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is a good idea. Unrelated note: I hope this wiki a reliable one. LOL. ^Law_shoot! 23:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to create some DRAMA with your new tools: the DRAMA level of Wikipedia is dangerously low! THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Dose

Are you playing in the sandbox again? MM MM good! Law_{type! snype?} 22:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move Survey: Your Opinion is Requested

There is a moving discussion & survey going on, on the page "Bitch". Your opinion has been requested, click here to vote, it is urged that you vote in a timely manner. Thank You.

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 21:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hands Down

You have the best user page on Wikipedia. =) Panzer V Panther (talk) 03:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great Userpage!

		The Excellent User Page Award
		Your userpage is by far the best user page I have EVER seen. Irunongames • play 20:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wat

Candlejack was phFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

lol

i think THEN WHO WAS PHONE? is a pretty cool guy. eh edits wikipedia and doesn't afraid of anything. --Node (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where on Earth did you go?

You got the monkey off your back eh? Law_{type! snype?} 10:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

North Epping murders

Hi, seeking support to keep regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Epping murders. Do you have an opinion on that? Thanks Ajayvius (talk) 10:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it

Whatever you are doing, stop. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 13:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No longer am I tj9991. I am... tslocum. tslocum (talk | contribs) 17:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my goodness

you certainly have an impressive userpage. Decora (talk) 23:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog

Or, with your professed love of cheese, would you be a mouse? I hope you don't mind the little touch I left on your quite memorable Userpage. --La comadreja _{formerly AFriedman} RESEARCH (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Resident Evil (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resident Evil (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resident Evil (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]