User talk:Ukexpat/Archive 27

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ukexpat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 20

←

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

Archive 28

Archive 29

Archive 30

Thank you for your note about permissions. Eric Arnott's son, Stephen Arnott, the originator of the image eric arnott.jpg is sending an email to wiki to permissions-commons wikimedia.org to give permission for its use. Thank you. Ovigalltd (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

UKexpat, I appreciate that you're a whizz at Wiki but I don't think its encouraging to new people to delete their work without giving time for them to respond to the notices raised such as "notability". Pages are works in progress. It takes time to develop and raise the necessary information to note that a page is notable. I have found many examples of academic centres that have their own pages, starting with all under the Kennedy School of Government. I understand the concept of proving notability but deleting pages immediately does not give one a chance. I note that you deleted and redirected another page that had been on Wiki for several years. Having just joined I hardly see this as a community experience but rather a heavy handed mechanism of imposing someone else's will. I spoke about the notability of the pages to another old hand who advised on how to adapt it and had the courtesy of leaving it up there for this process to work itself through. I have also started a conversation on the general topic of notability of academic centres and whether they should be separate pages or not. To simply delete someone's work without bothering to engage in a discussion is just contrary to everything I thought wikipedia was about and has, quite frankly, put me off. The good experiences with people like DGG have been completely over whelmed by your actions. Signing off for the last time in wikipedia --Ddragovic (talk) 16:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I haven't "deleted" anything, I have redirected to the college article. If sources can be found that demonstrate the notabiliy of these sub-institutes (please use the talk pages of the redirected pages to discuss) the redirects can be undone. – ukexpat (talk) 16:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

How can others contribute to the development of a page and improve the information supporting its notability if you've hidden it from being publicly accessible? Many pages have the large notice at the top notifying of its need for improvement and the community contributes as they come across knowledge, hence pages are improved. I just did that for a few pages with the banners calling for contributions. The banners had been there for one and a half and two years. I thought that this was what Wikipedia was about. I went and bought a book today to contribute to the notability of the pages that you had commented were not notable. Why would I bother now to make the effort if after every move I see you over my shoulder judging whether its notable? You should leave pages up and YOU should start a discussion on whether it should be redirected so that others can continue to contribute and eventually make a community decision. I had such an experience with Wiki, which I can call my good experience, and I thanked those who were kind enough to make the effort to discuss pages rather than heavy handedly act upon one person's judgement--everything that is not wikipedia.--Ddragovic (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I bumped up the process further and applied a G10 speedy tag; whoever turned it down the first time didn't take five seconds to find out the "National Greek Homosexual Society" doesn't exist and this article is meant as a hit piece against the subject. Nate • (chatter) 18:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Good call, should have investigated further myself. – ukexpat (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I understand the conflict of interest, I did not create this article and I don't know who did but I would like the photographs removed regardless of what happens to the article itself. Thanks, Liz.--Lizhysen (talk) 20:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi and thank you for answering my query. I don't believe Dr. Ghadimi is looking to post his CV. He made some break throughs in laboratory studies that he wants to pass on. All articles are published but not available on line. Wikipedia is beyond me, I am his personal assistant and trying to help him out. Any suggestions? Greenpea6068.47.149.76 (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, pull together some reliable sources that demonstrate his notability, then submit a request at WP:Requested articles. Note that links to his articles are not reliable sources, they must be third party sources that discuss his work in detail. – ukexpat (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

I typed Vivid Racing in the search box and nothing came up. I spent hours adding to this page. Where is it?Betty Merm (talk) 23:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

If you click on Vivid Racing, you will see an extract from the deletion log indicating that the article was speedily deleted for being "unambiguous advertising or promotion". – ukexpat (talk) 04:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Stop editing my article.. seriously!!! It goes against wiki rules and you can get in trouble for it. Theres no reason to do this to other people. If you want to make suggestions, thats fine, theres a talk page for that. But dont vandalize other people's articles. Its considered vandalism and you can get into trouble. Bldonne (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC).

Please read WP:OWN - it is NOT your article. All my changes are inline with WP:MOS and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you continue to exhibit ownership of the article, you may be blocked. – ukexpat (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much Ukexpat. I will read through the links and guide lines you gave me and will do my best. I am hoping maybe I can tuck under your wing and allow you to be my mentor???

--Greenpea60 (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings-

Please revert back to the changes I made deleting birthplace & citizenship on Salima Ikram's wikipedia page, as my sister Salima Ikram doesn't want that information listed anymore. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adenikram (talk • contribs) 16:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello ukexpat:

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Over the past couple of days, I have been doing some research and have come across several articles about people who have legally changed their names (Metta World Peace, Muhammad Ali, etc.). I got curious and went to the article on name changes, where a couple of others were mentioned. Most of that article is about the process and legality in various countries, though.

Would a list of people who have legally changed their names be appropriate for Wikipedia, either on that page or as a stand-alone? It would, of course, be limited to people who already have articles, and only for those who have made legal name changes (not pseudonyms, stage names or nicknames).

I appreciate your input.

— Michael J 02:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Michael, thanks for the message. I don't see any reason why that would not be a viable list - the inclusion criteria are simple and I think it would meet the requirements of WP:LIST. I suggest that you create a user space draft (in a user subpage) first so you can take your time developing it. Let me know if you need help creating a subpage. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. I have only a few names at this time, so I won't put it in the mainspace yet. .... I have a few subpages already, but I appreciate the offer. When I get it going, I will let you know so you can take a look.   → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ 20:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

OK will do. – ukexpat (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

I started it here. (However, I just discovered the page "List of stage names", although mine is not the same in that it includes more than entertainment people.)    → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ 23:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

About the article Oregon State Office of Degree Authorization I would like to thank you for your input so far. I was afraid to touch the article after I was tagteamed by a few people over the euclid university page. Seems that accreditation and degrees are a sensitive subject on wikipedia, lots of sock puppets. Satinmaster (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Asil Nadir, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages FTSE and Serious Fraud Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Ukexpat,

I'm mystified about how to develop an article over a period of days without saving it so that it becomes availabe to the world before its time. When I've tried using a sandbox, the Save button says clicking it makes it available. What gives? I need several days of development time. How does taht work? Many thanks... SBW — Preceding unsigned comment added by July5ly (talk • contribs) 18:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

You can create your own sandbox at, say, User:July5ly/Sandbox (click on the redlink to open in edit mode then click save). However, there are no private spaces on Wikipedia, so your sandbox will be accessible to and editable by anyone (if they know where it is). It will not however be deleted unless it contains copyright violations or blatantly promotional material. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Ukexpat,

Thanks for the sandbox reply. I believe I am more confident about that aspect now. I have an image that I have permission to use from the owner for my article. If I post that image to the commons are, then thatimage becomes available for everyone to use? Suppose the owner is not okay with that?```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by July5ly (talk • contribs) 19:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

This all goes back to the permission. Commons will not accept images that are released for use only on Wikipedia, it has to be for all purposes or not at all, see Commons licensing for details. So if the copyright owner does not want to release it for all purposes, the image cannot be uploaded to Commons. – ukexpat (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Ukexpat,

Okay. I understand the all or none nature of images use. I'll double-check with the owner before I include it in my article. Many thanks...--July5ly (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Ukexpat. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of JS Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Good morning. I am asking for help. I care for an elderly retired doctor that wants some information to show up here. We have sat for hours putting something together. I know nothing about Wikipedia accept how to use it. I tried publishing what he wanted full well knowing that it would be rejected. He had me edit something out of it and publish for review again. I am looking for help with what exactly he can publish. I am looking for a mentor/someone to take me under there wing and help me get him off my back!!! Could it be you? Please? Thank you in advance! greenpea60 Greenpea60 (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

You added the Proposed deletion tag to this page. I am new to the English Wikipedia version, so I'm not familiar with all rules but of some of them. I know that I have to add references of third party sources but what is wrong in addition? Please tell me! --Develope PC (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

The key issue is notability and to deal with that you need to cite reliable, third party sources that demonstrate notability per the guidelines. Please take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners for assistance. – ukexpat (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I understand but why deletion? I published this on the 30th of January, so I hadn't not a week at all to improve the article. And there is already a tag for this issue of notability and references. Is there a reason for stay the tag there? I only need some days for improving it and then (after improving) we should discuss it on the LEPTON CMS talk page --Develope PC (talk) 15:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Primal Fear (album)			Jerry Orbach
	Til It Kills			James Bradley (author)
	Luis Diego Arnáez			BET Lifetime Achievement Award
	Samsung Galaxy Y		Merge
	Guilherme Farinha			Israeli Democracy Institute
	James Celestine			List of Tamil people
	The Tip			Electronic journalism
	George Rossi		Add sources
	William Bromfield			List of camouflage patterns
	The Bofors Gun			Symbionese Liberation Army
	Live in a Dive (Sick of It All album)			Lay It on the Line
	Alfonso Quesada		Wikify
	Mayday (Awkward Thought album)			Jonathan Harries
	Jojo Moyes			Higher State
	Leah Zelikhman			Catalina magazine
	Matt King (comedian)		Expand
	Pablo Antonio Gabas			1847 in the United States
	Miles Jupp			1882 in the United States
	Viewers Like You (album)			Ridge Forrester

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Since you have listed yourself as a peer review volunteer interested in copyediting, would you like to support the quest to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia by giving a thorough review of the article Movement for the Intellectually Disabled of Singapore? MINDS turns 50 this year and getting their article to GA status would be a great way to appreciate their support of intellectually disabled Singaporeans. Thanks! 谢谢！Terima kasih! நன்றி! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

i wrote an article called, 'falcon and magluta', which you "edited" or worse (i cant say vandalized because its against diki rules, even though i and others think otherwise). anyway, i need your answer to a question. on that article, one of the headings was, 'Rise to Power'. you changed it to 'Rise'. why did you do this considering that falcon and magluta rose to power when everyone knows that billionaire drug lords are powerful. you dont become a billionaire without becoming powerful. why does the heading, 'Rise to Power,' worry you so much that you had to change it? i'm of italian descent. i noticed that many editors and admins have some ethno-centric/racist views. i would like to know if you carry such views considering how you "edited" my article in such a manner. Bldonne (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I edited it like that because per WP:MOSHEAD, headings should be as simple as possible. – ukexpat (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

what you said makes no sense. the heading, 'rise to power' is not complicated or long, just 3 words. how is it not simple? there are other wiki articles with much complicated and longer headings.. heres an example of an article out of a million such articles: Einstein - in this article about einstein, there are these headings: 2.2 Thermodynamic fluctuations and statistical physics and 2.3 General principles postulated by Einstein now, why dont you shorten these as well since its your job as an admin or editor? for example, why dont you make the 2nd heading more simple as in, 'Einstein's General Princliples'? i would like to read your excuse on this one since youre not giving any good reasons. i got my theory as to why youre doing this, but i want to read your answer first.74.108.161.48 (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

That was my reason and I strongly object to any implication that my motives were otherwise. I have not looked at the Einstein article or thousands of others that may not comply with MOS, but if you look at any of the many hundreds of articles that I have cleaned up in accordance with MOS, you will see that I am 100% consistent in my approach. One more personal attack, veiled or otherwise, and I will see you at WP:ANI. – ukexpat (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

so how is 'rise to power' so long and complicated? it sums up the rise to power of the drug lords. you have not provided any real explanation for this. and heres your chance to look at the einstein article. it contains long content headings, clean those up. and point out to me where in my last response to you i "personally attacked" you "veiled or otherwise". this i got to hear. anyway, i will be looking for those changes in the einstein article. 74.108.161.48 (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

OK fine, I concede, you can use "Rise to power" if you rewrite the article. Happy now? And please log into your account when you edit. We are done here. – ukexpat (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

thank you. thats all i needed to know. and i apologize for my anger. again, thank you.

20:29, 6 February 2012 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.161.48 (talk)

I just wanted to thank you for your welcome message. Unfortunately, my article was deleted due to G11 code. I tried to make the article informational, but I guess it was seen as more of an ad. Can you tell me if deleted articles are archived anywhere so I can get it back to redo it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betty Merm (talk • contribs) 22:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I may have forgotten to type the tildes, so I am repeating my message thanking you for your welcome message. My contributions were deleted because of G11, though I thought I made my article informational and not like an ad. Do you know if I can retrieve the article somewhere so I can work on it? I asked the person who deleted it, but he/she didn't respond to that question.Betty Merm (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Only admins have access to deleted articles. If the admin who deleted this one hasn't responded, you will have to ask another. I would suggest posting a message at the admin's noticeboard indicating the name of the article. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

How do we know that dogsagainstromney.com acquired sufficient rights to the image from the Globe, or that the Globe acquired them from Jane Romney? Without understanding the copyright trail, how can we confirm that the image is properly licensed here? – ukexpat (talk) 20:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm unsure legally how far we have to go back confirming the legitimacy of the copyright. Dogs Against Romney has this photo posted on their website, and they granted Wikipedia the right to use it under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 license. I know that Dogs Against Romney obtained the photo from the Boston Globe, which has the same photo on their website. The Boston Globe says that they obtained the photo from Jane Romney.Debbie W. 05:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! But there should be two 'h's - Fischhof. I notice that all the Music Encyclopedia links go to that spelling. Pkeets (talk) 22:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

That will need admin assistance. Please make a request at WP:Requested moves. – ukexpat (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I looked at the reference ("Thayer's Life of Beethoven"), and it says "Fischoff" (that's one "h" and two "f"s). Google Book search seems to agree, so I have moved the article to that name. I'm no expert, and I don't have access to the dead tree references, so do tell me if I'm wrong. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I am not an expert, just responding to a request at the Help Desk. – ukexpat (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Having had a closer look, I have to yield to Pkeets' request. It is two "h"s and one "f". Best to keep the discussion in one place, so I've notified Pkeets. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I first thought "Fischoff" as the source I was using spelled it that way, but after a survey of other references, I think "Fischhof" predominates. There's a disagreement on "Joseph/Josef" as well, but I'll take care of it with redirects. Pkeets (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate the need for objectivity and have limited my edit to factual corrections, which I am uniquely expert to make. There are other elements to the existing entry which breach Wikipedia's rules for objectivity, as they are polemical and not strictly relevant to the case. As a new user, I am not yet familiar with how to challenge this, constructively, and hope to learn about this, in due course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MorganNPG (talk • contribs) 18:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello - you've been helpful in the past, so I thought that I'd ask for your assistance again. I've contacted the person who manages the robot that flagged images on a Wiki entry for removal, but I'm not sure if he's going to be able to help restore the images to their rightful place on the entry - please read the following correspondance -

Regarding removal of images from the Karl Ferris Wiki entry

Hello - I was notified that you, on behalf of Wikimedia, have temporarily removed images of the artist's work from his Wiki entry. Can you please explain why this was done? Do you need help in verifying his copyrights? I have been a dealer of his photography for 6 years and a collector of his works for over 20 and would be more than happy to help you verify his copyrights so that you can restore these images. What sort of proof do you need that he created/owns these images? He has been credited with being the photographer/designer of EVERY image you've removed - you can verify that yourself simply by looking at the production credits for each of the album cover images you've removed (you can find these credits listed on sites such as artistdirect.com). He has also been producing and selling fine art prints of these images for over 20 years. While he might not have the merchandising rights (those being owned by the record companies), US and International copyright law allows him to show his images as examples of the works of art he is selling. You will find his works being sold at galleries all over the world, including mine (rockpopgallery.com), St. Paul's Gallery in the UK (stpaulsgallery.com) and San Francisco Art Exhange (sfae.com). Please let me know what else you might need to restore these images to this artist's entry. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Mike Goldstein, owner RockPoP Gallery - Portland, OR, USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockpop (talk • contribs) 19:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Rockpop; I didn't delete any images, someone else did that, my bot just notified you about it. Well, as to permissions - to sit on Wikipedia the images need to be licensed in a way that permits both commercial reuse and derivative works. Images that belong to another individual must be released by them; the simplest way to verify this permission is to get them to send an email to permissions-en@wikipedia.org. You can find full details of the process (and what is required by the permissions team) at WP:PERMISSIONS. If you need any other help please just ask! --Errant (chat!) 19:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello - Karl sent me a note and said that he has tried to notify the right people to restore these images. He owns the images and controls the licenses, so what else (other than a letter from Karl) would he need to provide, and who must he provide it to? He contacted me for help as he seemed unable to notify the right people to restore the images to his entry. Please advise - thanks!

Please let me know how you think that Karl might be able to convince whoever is in charge of curating his entry that the images are his and that he's giving permission to show them on his Wikipedia entry. THANKS for any help you'd be willing to provide - cheers - Mike Goldstein - RockPoP Gallery - Portland, OR, USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockpop (talk • contribs) 20:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

No one is in charge of "curating the article". The process for communicating permissions is set out at WP:CONSENT so I would advise Mr Ferris to follow that process. Please note that the permissions process is manned by volunteers and there is usually a backlog. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) That article needs an axe taking to it to strip it back to verifiable facts in reliable sources! SmartSE (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry that I didn't sign my posting - I am not in this area that often and forgot the protocol. Cheers - Mike G Rockpop (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Wow, you have a lot of banners. That is something I need to figure out!

Ukexpat: I don't know if you have similar feelings on this topic or have even thought about it. I hope so! Wikipedia has beautiful graphics. It would be nice if those graphics had open-source, public-domain software. Let me try to explain this. Let's say you just found a beautiful graphic animation in a field in which you are interested. And, you know how to program. You wonder where the last person left off, and where you might program to improve the graphic. But, there is no source code. You are faced with starting over with your program. That's not so bad. But, typically, graphics animations have assumptions, even if they are based on laws of physics. There is always something that comes up, and one must make assumptions or approximations. So, I would suggest that whatever is over on Commons that makes it through to the encylopedia be fully open. Source code and nothing less. This would be a massive effort. I do not want to propose such an idea as a newbie. However, I have already picked some graphic animations that I would like to rewrite and place in the PD. This also helps to protect the WMF from editors who have been a bit too generous and do not know they might be involved in a licensing or a copyvio situation. Written from scratch, our animated gifs would be PD, transparent, and available for improvement. I also noticed that some of these animations violate NOR, because they have implicit assumptions beyond referenced equations. This is not the fault of the programmer - it is just implicit to programming itself. If we talk about students who are readers of the encyclopedia, then we have even more reason to move forward on such an "open-code" project: Students are the most likely people who would check and improve our sophisticated animated graphics. Petaaclu (talk) 04:18, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Whilst I agree that these roles may seem trivial, many people are wanting information on this film as not much has been spoken about it. I am merely trying to give them all the information I can find. G.Light (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to respond but I'm still baffled. I have read Article Wizard but somehow have missed how to transmit a new article to Wikipedia for consideration: for example can I write it and email the finished piece as an attachment and to what address do I send it? Can you advise me where on Article Wizard I can learn this? Otherwise Article Wizard has been informative and helpful. Jackclinton (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC) jack clinton

There is no way to e-mail the article, you have to create it by writing the text in Wikipedia's interface. So you will have to copy it from the application where you have written it and paste it into the article wizard at the appropriate step. Just follow the Wizard's instructions and it should be fine. An alternative would be to paste the text into a sandbox in your user space -- User:Jackclinton/Sandbox - click on this redlink and paste the text, then click the "save" button. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Horace Lawson Hunley			The Ford Plant
	Rás 2			Franchi SPAS-15
	Chris Murtagh			John Bell (actor)
	Strength Power Will Passion		Merge
	School for Seduction			Fix Me
	Sathavathani Sheikh Thambi Pavalar			Paddock
	Drug Free America Foundation			World
	Body and Soul (Coleman Hawkins album)		Add sources
	Robert Hammerstiel			Muslim scholars of the 1st century AH
	Demand letter			Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service
	John Spencer-Churchill (artist)			Simon O'Brien (presenter)
	Samsung Galaxy Fit		Wikify
	Mike Sigel			EDDA submachine gun
	Eternal Law (TV series)			Direct response television
	State Preeminent Science and Technology Award			Garand carbine
	Across the Open Sea		Expand
	Martin Love			1846 in the United States
	Rape on the Installment Plan			James Emanuel
	Michael Brown (cricketer)			Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your help and advice! I've followed your directions, when you have a chance would you mind taking a look and letting me know what you think?ELH7897 (talk) 16:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, should have added the link to the article for your review: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ELH7897/ELH7897/sandbox Thanks in advance. ELH7897 (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC) >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Embrun, Hautes-Alpes			Eric Cantor
	Commodity checkoff program			Saline High School (Michigan)
	Sainte-Florine			Micky Modelle
	Bar Girls		Merge
	George Hourmouziadis			Sarajevo Open
	Ben Lessy			Santa Maria, California
	Employment Standards Administration			Browse wrap
	Sports Car Market		Add sources
	Joan Shawlee			Aruban florin
	Jackie Ashley			Florin
	George Pattison			Old Croghan Man
	Journey (novel)		Wikify
	Gorakshep			Stage Fright (1997 film)
	Alfredo Ferrari			United States Office of Research Integrity
	Dragon Gate Inn			TDI Disraptor
	Estadio Alejandro Morera Soto		Expand
	Florin (Sacramento RT)			Ellen Burstyn
	Zhanaozen			Enzo Dara
	Botched			Art Mills

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello Ukexpat,

Many thanks for your quick reply to my page move request: User:ARouleau/sandbox → IdeaWork Studios, Inc. – Requesting that this page be named IdeaWork Studios, Inc. and be moved to the List of Advertising Agencies. ARouleau (talk) 20:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I saw that you oppose this entry/page move, as you felt it was promotional. I worked hard to ensure this was factually-based only, and used all the other advertising agencies listed as a template, so as to avoid this specifically. Would you be willing to offer suggestions on how to modify this entry, so that it could be listed with the other advertising agencies, already on Wikipedia? Since there are myriad agencies already listed on Wikipedia, I'm hopeful that we can make the necessary tweaks to ensure this listing is as it should be. I'd be very grateful for any assistance/advice you would be willing to share with me on this matter, and look forward to hearing from you!

Many thanks, ARouleau--ARouleau (talk) 15:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

You should submit the article for review using the WP:Articles for creation process. Please let me know if you need assistance with that. Also, you refer to "we" - is your account being used by more than one person or are you creating the article on behalf of the subject of the article? If the former, please see WP:NOSHARE, if the latter, please see WP:COI.--ukexpat (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello again, and thanks so much for your assistance and quick reply! I have submitted the article via the WP: Articles for creation process. Thank you very much for this tip. To answer your question, the "we" to which I referred meant you and me (i.e. your advice, so that I may make tweaks as needed). I look forward to seeing the outcome of the articles for creation process. Many thanks again! --ARouleau (talk) 18:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Ukexpat,

I left some messages on the Wolff Olins talk page a month or so ago but haven't gotten any responses. Instead of trying to make changes to the page myself, I'd simply like to start a conversation to expand the page as the wikipedia community sees fit (since the completion rating is still quite low). I tried to put in a "tag" to bring the question to people's attention but it hasn't seemed to work. Is there a better way to get the word out? Or is it simply a waiting game? In your mind, what types of things would make the page more complete?

Also, I may be a bit biased but as of now, I feel like the page doesn't seem to capture the wider reputation of Wolff Olins: "unorthodox" or "non-standard." Yes, calling the firm "controversial" starts to get at the idea, but I know that alot of the company's work has been praised for being adventurous/boundary-pushing in a positive way as well. (see Tate, (RED), PwC). Any thoughts about a change to the page that might reflect this? http://www.identityworks.com/forum/identity-business/worlds-top-ten-identity-firms/ http://www.fastcodesign.com/1662367/pwcs-mighty-morphin-logo-adapts-to-web-print-and-beyond-video http://www.identityworks.com/reviews/2010/PwC.htm

thanks for your time and input, Sbl19 (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey guys!

Thanks to all of you who have commented on the New Page Triage talkpage. If you haven't had a chance yet, check it out; we're discussing some pretty interesting ideas, both from the Foundation and the community, and moving towards implementing quite a few of them :).

In addition, on Tuesday 13th March, we're holding an office hours session in #wikimedia-office on IRC at 19:00 UTC (11am Pacific time). If you can make it, please do; we'll have a lot of stuff to show you and talk about, including (hopefully) a timetable of when we're planning to do what. If you can't come, for whatever reason, let me know on my talkpage and I'm happy to send you the logs so you can get an idea of what happened :). Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ckny01 (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Thank you for the welcome! I am clearly new, trying to list this post (my job), but also personally and professional have HUGE respect for Wikipedia and the editing community. I will be open to any feedback and suggestions!Ckny01 (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Welcome to the first edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

• Metrics are out from week one. Week one showed that the need for Teahouse hosts to invite new editors to the Teahouse is urgent for this pilot period. It also showed that emailing new users invitations is a powerful tool, with new editors responding more to emails than to talk page templates. We also learned that the customized database reports created for the Teahouse have the highest return rate of participation by invitees. Check out the metrics here and see how you can help with inviting in our Invitation Guide.
• A refreshed "Your hosts" page encourages experienced Wikipedians to learn about the Teahouse and participate. With community input, the Teahouse has updated the Your hosts page which details the host roles within the Teahouse pilot and the importance that hosts play in providing a friendly, special experience not always found on other welcome/help spaces on Wikipedia. It also explains how Teahouse hosts are important regarding metrics reporting during this pilot. Are you an experienced editor who wants to help out? Take a look at the new page today and start learning about the hosts tasks and how you can participate!
• Introduce yourself and meet new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. New & experienced editors to Wikipedia can add a brief infobox about themselves and get to know one another with direct links to userpages. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, they'll surely be happy to feel the wikilove!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

I can't find the "contest the speedy deletion" on the page. I was asked by the Society for Socialist Studies to create a W page for them. I simply took information from the website that they asked me to. Why is this a problem? You can even email Elaince Coburn at her email on the Journal website and ask her yourself.

God damn I hate writing to Wikipedia. It's like the site was organized by a group of ten year olds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.15.157.167 (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey all!

Thanks to everyone who attended our first office hours session; the logs can be found here, if you missed it, and we should be holding a second one on Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. I hope to see you all there :).

In the meantime, I have greatly expanded the details available at Wikipedia:New Page Triage: there's a lot more info about precisely what we're planning. If you have ideas, and they aren't listed there, bring them up and I'll pass them on to the developers for consideration in the second sprint. And if you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, send them there too!

Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know that it hasn't been accepted. I can't see where to view the article to read the comments, please could you advise? Many thanks, Charlie Melville — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlotte Melville (talk • contribs) 09:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Czarkoff declined the submission - you will see their comments at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Swiftflow.--ukexpat (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for making my talk page. I've gotten a couple of responses on my help desk query but nothing that really tells me what to do here. I realize Wikipedia is decentralized, but is there any way to get a hold of someone in an administrative capacity who can tell me what to do here?

Thanks.

Charles Kozierok (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

If a person (who admits to doing so) creates a page about themselves with little qualification to do so and I edit saying they did so amount to vandalism? Is Wikipedia about truth or pandering to inflated egos? Very strange practice, and in the interests of tranparency I see I have done nothing wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.89.118 (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I have added an appropriate tag to the article.--ukexpat (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear Ukexpat

thanks for your welcome message. I will be working on the Corby and Baily page over the coming few days to tidy it up and make the necessary and recommended corrections. Apologies this has taken so long, I have suffered a serious illness and and only really beginning to surface now. :)

Any hints gratefully received

Mothas

--Mothas (talk) 22:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Joseph Capgras			Cape Breton University
	Los Angeles Times Festival of Books			Atrauli
	Enzo Siciliano			Stephen Moyer
	Rheem		Merge
	Loose connective tissue			Impostor syndrome
	Chrysococcyx			Stacie Monroe
	Teach Your Children			Sheffield Farms
	Central New York		Add sources
	Mattersey			Sutton Valence School
	Four Horsemen (drink)			Monothematic delusion
	Enzo Bianco			Enzo Pérez
	Shift time		Wikify
	Kepler-20b			Gurdev Khush
	South of Pico			Centreside Dairy
	Isinglass River			Southern Dairy Compact
	Long-tailed Cuckoo		Expand
	Syndrome of subjective doubles			Dairy farming in New Zealand
	Dairy Promotion Program			Atlantic Ocean
	Strike and dip			Mage (comics)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Strange how copyvios (and fluffy BLPS) sometimes stick around for years. Thanks for noticing. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

I can't take the credit -- saw it at WP:BLPN!--ukexpat (talk) 16:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)