User talk:Vannessajg

An article you recently created, Stuart Bascombe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am touching base to make sure that the draft is waiting to be seen. I has been about a month. But just want to make sure I did the right thing for it to be reviewed and moved to main space.

Thank you. Vannessajg (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Not an article - looks more like information for your user page User:Vannessajg see Wikipedia:User pages

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vannessajg/sandbox/Vannessajg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vannessajg/sandbox/Vannessajg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vannessajg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by GoingBatty was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: If this information is about you, you can add it to User:Vannessajg.

GoingBatty (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Bascombe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 08:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Vannessajg (talk) 11:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, acceptance is just the start. We accept drafts when we believe that they have a better than 50% chance of surviving a deletion discussion. As normal humans we can be mistaken. Time will tell here. Fiddle Faddle 21:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I see. However, I welcome the feedback good or bad, because it is all a learning experience and helps me going forward. Thank you for your input. --Vannessajg (talk) 21:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vannessajg, the important thing is not to get downhearted nor upset. We all have articles deleted that were dear to us. The best editors here started with disappointments. Like you are, they learned. I have an essay that may help you to see where folk are coming from. Fiddle Faddle 21:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Faddle, the articles was accepted as Keep. Thanks you for recommending it in the first place. Vannessajg (talk) 04:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Bascombe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Bascombe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend using {{cite web}} when adding citations for web sources in articles. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: There is a whole family ot {{cite}} templates. If we are looking for reliable sources {{cite news}} is a very frequent one to use.. Help:Citation Style 1 is very useful for all of us. You might also look at {{efn}} for notes that are not citations Fiddle Faddle 21:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Vannessajg (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vannessajg. You have new messages at Richard3120's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Richard3120 (talk) 23:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for Russell Patterson's page to be accepted. Vannessajg (talk) 15:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Ivory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cashbox. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Honey Cone Promo Pic1972.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Melissa Haizlip photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Here is the ticket number from permission that was on the receipt email which was sent to them today. Fw: [Ticket#2020122210008506] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Photo: Melissa Haizl [...]) Vannessajg (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Knox ken.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, This is the receipt number permission gave the author of the photo mentioned on December 15, 2020. Tammy Cole is the author of the photo. [Ticket#: 2020121510016814].

Thanks for uploading File:Russell Patterson promo shot ray harper.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The photo was submitted on June 3, 2020 along with the release for. Here is the ticket number from the receipt from permission: Re:[Ticket#2020060310001444] Fw: Copyright form for File:Russell Patterson promo shot ray harper.jpg

Vannessajg (talk) 21:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Please add {{subst:OP}} to the file descriptions of the above photographs, so that OTRS volunteers can verify {{OTRS pending}}. To facilitate this, you might add the OTRS ticket on the file talk pages. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 21:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the code.Vannessajg (talk) 22:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Animalparty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mr. Soul! have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Animalparty, Thank you for the feedback. This was my first time that I am creating a page for a film. I did take a look at other film pages to see their format, and saw that they had a critical reception section with reviews from critics. However, I understand now the appearance of it. Again, thank you for you feedback. Vannessajg (talk) 21:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vannessajg. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Knox ken.JPG — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi B-bot, A release form was sent to Permissions on December 18, 2020 and they confirmed that it was received and sent an email on December 19, 2020 to the author Tazz Cole with the Ticket#: 2020121510016814 for File:Knox ken.JPG acknowledging it. I trust this information helps it along. Vannessajg (talk) 16:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vannessajg. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Russell Patterson promo shot ray harper.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi B-bot, the photo name was changed by the author to File:My Life My Music.jpg and is being used on Russell Patterson Wikipedia page. Ray Harper is the author and uploaded the photo under his username, Harpersings. As such you can delete the photo that I uploaded File:Russell Patterson promo shot ray harper.jpg. Sorry for the confusion. Vannessajg (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vannessajg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Russell Patterson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, I have been requesting for that draft page to be deleted. I created a page for Russell Patterson Singer and I had removed all of the text on the draft page and someone put it back. Please delete the draft page.Vannessajg (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ron Kellum promo shot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The release form was emailed to permission by the author and the ticket number on the receipt that was sent back is [Ticket#2021062210001782]. I trust that this helps.
  Vannessajg (talk) 06:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ron Kellum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ron Kellum, is not suitable as written to remain published. There appears to be either a WP:UPE or WP:COI issue. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where it can remain while you address the UPE/COI concern. When you have made the necessary steps regarding COI/UPE, and the article meets WP:GNG and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not re-add to mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Please explain what is the specific issue. I looked up the codes that you listed and I don't see how it applies to me. I am not and was not paid to create Ron Kellum's page nor any other page I created and/or edited. It is insulting to me to have anyone think I am being paid, when I am donating my time and services. Ron isn't a client, friend or family member. I thought I referenced/sourced what I wrote. I will go back over it and check the article. Vannessajg (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I reformatted the article, and removed some content. Although, I have not been editing long, I did create about 17 pages, and edited over 100, so I thought I was using the same format on Ron Kellum's article that I did on the others. If you can review the draft page and let me know what is needed I would appreciate it. For the record, I had started watching the episodes of The Amazing Race and when I went to look up more information on Ron Kellum, I noticed the he didn't have a Wikipedia page, while almost all other contestant did. And, that is how I started with that article. Vannessajg (talk) 04:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Kellum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 01:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vannessajg: Great work on the Stuart Bascombe article. That was a quick turnaround on removing that bolding and I'm really happy to see it. Well done. scope_creep^Talk 10:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Scope creep You are welcome, I just happened to be surfing on some of the pages I created after creating a new one and saw it. That was a first for me. I never knew that bolding were in codes, so now I am on the look out for it when applying citations. Vannessajg (talk) 16:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I started creating pages during the shut-down. Mainly about "Old School" recording artists, since Classic Soul/R&B music from the 60s, 70s and 80s are my passion and work. The problem I am having is that I would like to create a page for the newly established Atlantic City Walk of Fame, but I am one of the founders of it. If the Atlantic City Walk of Fame meets Wikipedia's requirements of noteworthy, would someone else like to create the article? Vannessajg (talk) 11:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The {{help me}} template isn't a great way to solicit that sort of help; if you want to request an article be written, you should do so at WP:RA. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info.--Vannessajg (talk) 13:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:You and I bi.JPG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Time is love single.jpg
• File:I'll FInd Away Promo.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that the image has been replaced. As such, it can be removed. Vannessajg (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]