Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry Grandma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Grandma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an internet personality that doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. Jamiebuba (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Jamiebuba (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't oppose or disagree with your decision. The subject only has 1 news article associated with her name and the news source is a local news source, not a national news source. However, I believe the subject's prominence online would make her a good candidate for an article here. Lolza81 (talk) 06:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete That's not how Wikipedia works. Articles have to pass through guidelines (namely WP:GNG), not some vague statement about "the subject's prominence", which is debatable considering they only have ~300,000 subscribers, which really isn't much when dealing in an area that lacks reliable sources. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 09:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Internet, and Tennessee. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete. There are a surprising amount of angry grandmas online [1], [2], [3], none of which seem to be this person. "Angry grandma" and "internet" still gets you a few dozen. Delete for any sort of notability. Oaktree b (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO. It seems to be a more appropriate entry on Knowyourmemes than on Wikipedia. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.