Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darling (ESTK song)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Darling (ESTK song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant--QuestionOfAnarchy (talk) 11:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In the absence of evidence that the songs have any strong claim to notability on their own, merge all four songs to their parent albums. Bearcat (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable non-charting song. JamesBurns (talk) 10:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 14:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No real indication of notability. Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.