Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Anderson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 10:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jessie Anderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG, lack of in-depth converge in independent RS. There is some coverage in publications of the University of California/Merced where she graduated and are not independent. Others are minor mentions or otherwise not Reliable Sources. MB 00:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Coverage cited overall is weak. Sources include those directly from the subject's alumni, a LinkedIn post that no longer exists, more alumni posts, and a link to their spotify. There is one independent article cited, but the coverage is trivial and mentions the subject only briefly. This does not constitute significant coverage independent of the subject.
  2. I was not able to locate any further significant coverage. There is some coverage here, here, and here. These sources are reliable and independent. However these articles are about rocket launches and only trivially mention the subject in relation to their live-streaming the launch.
  3. So, looking at WP:GNG, I do not think the coverage is significant enough to warrant an independent article.
Overall, a good nom for deletion. Such-change47 (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need more participation here
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.