Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnooo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nnooo

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with the only sources of note being interviews, not secondary sources. These interviews were presented in the last AfD in an apparent misunderstanding of policy. There is little about the studio itself, only about their games. Notability is not inherited. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable company, page does not contain RSs and any would seem unlikely to exist. Fails to establish notability, fails WP:NCORP. Cabrils (talk) 23:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find an independent, secondary, source with more than a trivial mention. Fails WP:GNG - GA Melbourne (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.