Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pope's Exorcist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting that a draft for the article exists that may be submitted in the usual way in due course. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Pope's Exorcist

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pope's Exorcist

Teaser stub about unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability or general notability. Unreleased films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability. This stub does not say that production has happened, let alone that it was notable. The references are either teasers saying that there will be a film, or are about or by the late person that the movie is about.

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	imdb.com	IMDB summary of movie	Yes	No	No	No
2	msn.com	Announcement of planned film	Yes	No	Yes	No
3	abcnews.com	An interview with the real-life exorcist	Yes	Not about the film	Yes	Yes, but not about the film
4	worldcat.org	Listing of a book by the real-life exorcist	Yes	Not about the film	Yes	No
5	worldcat.org	Listing of another book by the real-life exorcist	Yes	Not about the film	Yes	No

The notability of Gabriele Amorth is not in dispute; we already have an article about him. This stub says nothing about the film except that it doesn't yet exist. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Politicians, Film, Christianity, Italy, and Australia. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is also a draft on this film. The draft has more information than this article. I recommend that this article be deleted, and the draft be kept, and resubmitted when the film is released. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Thanks for checking for drafts, Robert McClenon, and I think that plan is the best course of action. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment to User:Pbritti - I wasn't really checking for drafts. I was checking for articles, because I was primarily reviewing drafts. You're welcome anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Andre🚐 20:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing here yet. Manannan67 (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and others. Appears to be case of WP:TOOSOON. Plus, as noted above, a draft for the article already exists. Sal2100 (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.