Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tryon Coterie (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Tryon Coterie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable single chapter college club. Other than WP:SELFPUB, completely unreferenced. No reliable sources, as required by WP:GNG; Fails WP:ORG. Absolutely no legitimate claim of notability. Having some notable former members is not sufficient grounds for inclusion.GrapedApe (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable sources are added. Depending on the type and content of reliable sources, the article still might be better being merged to Baylor University instead of kept as a separate article. ElKevbo (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I suspect that BDF 1967a is one of the sources that was alluded to in the prior discussion. It doesn't provide much information that is specific to this individual subject. Uncle G (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Baylor Clubs Face Discipline". The Bonham Daily Favorite. 1967-11-07. p. 8.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only local notability - now simply a chapter of a larger fraternal organization that does not warrant an article of its own. dangerouspanda 19:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Google, Google Books and Google Scholar searches turned up no evidence of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails all notability requirements. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.