Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yiannis Laouris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed to this article more than a decade ago, but as I have not been active in wikipedia, I haven't seen the alert for deletion. For what is worth, the notability of this article should not have been judged by citation metrics, but by the extensive societal contributions of this muli-talented individual. If you decide to recover it, I would be happy to add independent and third party sources. Philosof66 (talk) 23:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yiannis Laouris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources other than perhaps the first one (which is a collection of sources) all seem primary or passing coverage. Hobit (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Hobit (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Hobit (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Hobit (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It would be a notable article, if there were independent sources. But right now, due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV and a lack of independent and third party sources, the article is not notable per WP:GNG nor per WP:NACADEMIC. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 01:16, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No GNG coverage has turned up, and his citation metrics are way too low to meet NPROF. JoelleJay (talk) 19:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.