Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Middle-earth. For other related proposals please start either a talk page discussion or another TfD with all relevant templates tagged. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Arda Mountains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. This topic is not something that gets considered as a collection frequently, and it is only used on the three articles it names. Middle-earth mountains aren't often discussed as a unit, so we don't need to have a template to navigate through this topic. Hog Farm (talk) 22:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Template:Middle-earth. Those articles are part of this same set of articles (I'd maybe consider splitting the fictional articles from the books into 2 separate templates).--Gonnym (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{Arda Realms Age1}}, {{Arda Realms Age2}}, {{Arda Realms Age3}}, {{Middle-earth elves}}, {{Middle-earth races}}, {{Middle-earth dwarves}}, {{Moria (Middle-earth)}} and {{Languages of Middle-earth}} could all be merged together into Template:Middle-earth. Some of them are already overlapping. --Gonnym (talk) 08:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{Middle-earth/sandbox}} as an example of only in-universe articles. --Gonnym (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Gonnym: I really like that sandbox template. Way more useful than the little, overlapping ones. Hog Farm (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Start with a merge and go from there. --Izno (talk) 01:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Certainly agree that all of those can be merged, but I think we probably want to end up with three templates to cover the whole thing: one for the Lord of the Rings, one for The Hobbit, and one (I think the existing Template:Middle-earth) for Silmarillion and other behind-the-scenes stuff really. The Sandbox example is rather too large and wandering for comfort. This would still be a large reduction in number of templates. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 12. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Huntress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:National Bolshevism sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete - WP:NENAN, as well as several inaccuracies, 'Left-wing nationalism' for a neo-fascist party?, Eurasianism for a self-described Russian irredentist party? What does Gregor Strasser and even Josip Broz Tito (???) have to do with National Bolshevism? ^[1] (Updated argument). - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, the people are connected through the main category. Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this template is barely used in comparison with its number of links. Relevant topics can be linked in the normal way, ie. via articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Macedonian diaspora organisations. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Macedonian diaspora political parties and political organisations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Macedonian diaspora organisations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Macedonian diaspora political parties and political organisations with Template:Macedonian diaspora organisations.
Merge into {{Macedonian diaspora organisations}}. No need for these two when both are so small. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support' either merge / redirect or merge/replace/delete . templates are tiny and there is some overlap. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Marxism–Leninism–Maoism sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, also duplicated by the Template:Maoism sidebar. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this is not a duplicate, maoism and marxism-leninism-maoism are different things

PresidenteGonzalo (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this template is barely used and I don't see a convincing reason why the template needs to remain. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).