Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Gecko Bug 1918670] Revert canonical order enforcement for position-try-fallbacks in WPT tests. #48162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

moz-wptsync-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

<try-tactic> is in fact order-dependent 1:

Given inline-start & end, block-start & end: 1 & 2, a & b:

  1. flip-start: a & 2, 1 & b
  2. flip-inline: 2 & a, 1 & b

And

  1. flip-inline: 2 & 1, a & b
  2. flip-start: a & 1, 2 & b

Are not equal.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D222114

bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1918670
gecko-commit: bf6dffc72a3452c98966164125201d146187ca35
gecko-reviewers: firefox-style-system-reviewers, emilio

…T tests.

`<try-tactic>` is in fact order-dependent [1]:

Given inline-start & end, block-start & end: 1 & 2, a & b:

1. `flip-start`: a & 2, 1 & b
2. `flip-inline`: 2 & a, 1 & b

And

1. `flip-inline`: 2 & 1, a & b
2. `flip-start`: a & 1, 2 & b

Are not equal.

[1]: cb15043#commitcomment-146669116

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D222114

bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1918670
gecko-commit: bf6dffc72a3452c98966164125201d146187ca35
gecko-reviewers: firefox-style-system-reviewers, emilio
Copy link
Collaborator

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The review process for this patch is being conducted in the Firefox project.

@moz-wptsync-bot moz-wptsync-bot merged commit 4c196c5 into master Sep 13, 2024
19 checks passed
@moz-wptsync-bot moz-wptsync-bot deleted the gecko/1918670 branch September 13, 2024 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment