52

I am downloading an ISO image of Lubuntu; they have two versions: 32 and 64.

But why do they call the 64 version amd64 since they say that it works for Intel also?

Improve this question
1

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
41

Because AMD was the first one to release 64-bit x86 (x86-64) CPUs.

the AMD64 architecture was positioned by AMD from the beginning as an evolutionary way to add 64-bit computing capabilities to the existing x86 architecture, as opposed to Intel's approach of creating an entirely new 64-bit architecture with IA-64.

The first AMD64-based processor, the Opteron, was released in April 2003.

In fact, in the kernel the 64-bit support is called 'x86_64' to refer to the fact that both AMD and Intel (and others) implement those instructions.

Improve this answer
3
  • 3
    Now it's correct. This however raises the question why the packages are not just called x64 or x86-64 instead, in contrast of using a vendor name.
    – Marco
    Commented Oct 31, 2012 at 12:00
  • 3
    @Marco: IIRC x86-64 was name introduced after the Intel released 64-bit processors and x64 was name introduced by Microsoft. Both things happened at the point when some distros already had support for AMD64. I remember the discussion if everything should be renamed to x86-64 (name x64 was not known at that point).
    – Maja Piechotka
    Commented Oct 31, 2012 at 16:56
  • 3
    Opterons were available before Intel had x86-64 CPUs available and Linux started calling it amd64 to differentiate it from IA-64. Later Intel licensed AMD's 64-bit extensions to include in their own CPUs x86-64 CPUs. Rather than rename everything the name amd64 remained.
    – bahamat
    Commented Oct 31, 2012 at 20:21
19

AMD intially implemented x86-64, before Intel. For this reason, most distros (and other OSs such as OpenBSD) did a first release when it was still AMD only, or renaming to x86-64 wasn't considered worth the effort.

I think one of the another contributing factors to this naming confusion was a conflict between Intel and AMD over naming. Intel had an identity crisis in it's 64-bit naming. It cycled through the names EM64T, IA-32e, and finally the official Intel 64. AMD on the other hand always called it AMD64. x86-64 was a fairly obvious name to cover both. However, it wasn't always like this. I remember when it was new and shiny people couldn't figure out what to call it. I've seen these:

  • x64 -- ambiguous between Itanium and x86-64
  • IA64 -- again, ambiguous with Itanium
  • amd64 -- what you see now
  • EM64T -- rare, but I've seen it before used to refer to both AMD and Intel

x86-64 is the obvious best short name for the architecture

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .