Candles at Nine
Candles at Nine | |
---|---|
Directed by | John Harlow |
Screenplay by | Basil Mason John Harlow |
Based on | novel The Mouse Who Wouldn't Play Ball by Anthony Gilbert[1] |
Produced by | Wallace Orton |
Starring | Jessie Matthews John Stuart Beatrix Lehmann |
Cinematography | James Wilson |
Edited by | Vi Burdon (uncredited) |
Music by | score composed & directed by: Charles Williams |
Production company | |
Distributed by | Anglo-American Film Corporation (UK) |
Release date |
|
Running time | 82 minutes |
Country | United Kingdom |
Language | English |
Candles at Nine is a 1944 British mystery film directed by John Harlow and starring Jessie Matthews, John Stuart and Beatrix Lehmann.[2] A wealthy man taunts his relations and staff about which of them shall inherit his estate after he changes his Will; the same night, he falls down the stairs. His money is left to a distant female relative; a target for intrigue, from some, and murder, from another.[3] It is based on the 1943 novel The Mouse Who Wouldn't Play Ball by Anthony Gilbert.
Plot
[edit]After the mysterious death of wealthy old Everard Hope, his avaricious relatives are little pleased to discover that his estate has been left to distant relation Dorothea Capper, a young showgirl. The one condition of the will is that she must stay in Hope's spooky mansion for a month. After several attempts on Dorothea's life, detective William Gardener decides to investigate.
Cast
[edit]- Eliot Makeham as Everard Hope
- Beatrix Lehmann as Julia Carberry
- John Salew as Griggs, Everard
- Joss Ambler as Garth Hope
- Vera Bogetti as Lucille Hope
- Andre Van Gyseghem as Cecil Tempest
- Winifred Shotter as Brenda Tempest
- Reginald Purdell as Charles Lacey
- Hugh Dempster as Hugh Lacey
- Jessie Matthews as Dorothea Capper
- John Stuart as William Gardener
- Ernest Butcher as Everard's gardener
- C. Denier Warren as Middletonr
- Patricia Hayes as Gewndolyn
Critical reception
[edit]TV Guide dismissed the film as a "Tedious mystery"[4]
Allmovie wrote, "the creaky pacing by director John Harlow makes the first half of the movie seem more soporific than atmospheric...the movie finally takes off when Matthews shows up on screen, and the visuals, the editing, the music, and the pacing all come to life. The problem there is that she looks a little long-of-tooth for the role she's playing, in terms of the element of wide-eyed wonder that she must display at her sudden good fortune -- at 37, even with lots of energy and great makeup, she looks awkward doing a role that would have been better suited to her in 1934. Beatrix Lehmann's portrayal of the housekeeper whose services she inherits comes from the Judith Anderson school of performing...and her creepy portrayal is one of the best things in the movie. There are also a couple of charming (and brief) musical sequences, one of them breaking the tension at just the right moment as the thriller's plot winds tighter. The whole thing doesn't hang together seamlessly, but it's an enjoyable diversion, if one hangs in past the first 18 minutes' tedium."[5]
References
[edit]- ^ Goble, Alan (1 January 1999). The Complete Index to Literary Sources in Film. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110951943 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Candles at Nine (1944)".
- ^ "Candles at Nine (1945)". Archived from the original on 14 January 2009.
- ^ "Candles At Nine". TVGuide.com.
- ^ "Candles at Nine (1944) - John Harlow - Review - AllMovie". AllMovie.