User contributions for Jybl

12:2212:22, 26 July 2020 diff hist +46 Link REIT →Criticism: "it has been widely considered a "corporate monster" in Hong Kong" Regarding Jimbo Wales' September 2003 post on the WikiEN-l mailing list: If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts; Please provide more reference regarding the term "corporate monster"
12:1212:12, 26 July 2020 diff hist +1 m Link REIT No edit summary
12:1112:11, 26 July 2020 diff hist +28 Link REIT Should put "corporate monster" under criticism section.

13:0313:03, 24 May 2020 diff hist +1,310 User talk:Citobun No edit summary
13:0313:03, 24 May 2020 diff hist −547 Link REIT Undid revision 953432314 by Citobun (talk) According to Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Undue_weightDue and Undue Weight of Wikipedia’s NPOV, the term ‘corporate monster’ in your reference is only described by extremely minority. There is no another reference in Google regarding describing LINK REIT as a ‘corporate monster’. More importantly, the reference is belonged to an OPINION column - the view by Richard Harris. Tag: Undo

13:5913:59, 26 April 2020 diff hist +58 User talk:Jybl No edit summary
09:4009:40, 26 April 2020 diff hist +255 User talk:Citobun →Discussion about Link Reit editing
09:3709:37, 26 April 2020 diff hist −13 User talk:Citobun →Discussion about Link Reit editing
09:3509:35, 26 April 2020 diff hist +1,665 User talk:Citobun No edit summary
09:2209:22, 26 April 2020 diff hist −136 Link REIT Agree ‘monopoly’ has been referenced in the body. However, there is no reference to refer Link REIT as a “corporate monster”. This term and the statement are misleading which has harmed Link REIT’s reputation unjustly. Such term and statement are completely a defamation and must not be posted on wiki according to Wikipedia:Libel. Also, as Wiki’s co-founder Jimmy Wales said, zero information is preferred to misleading or false information. As such, the statement ‘it has been widely considered a “

14:1514:15, 9 January 2020 diff hist −400 Link REIT →Initial public offering: WRONG Reference. According to the Cheng's Insight Opinion Article, The Link had first asset sale in 2016. The article did not mention about the 2005 Lo Siu-lan case and NGOs were concerned that the reduced income of the Housing Authority. (https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1530896/link-reits-sale-shopping-centres-will-leave-poorer-residents)
12:3012:30, 9 January 2020 diff hist +4 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests →Direct cause
12:3012:30, 9 January 2020 diff hist +4 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests No edit summary
12:2912:29, 9 January 2020 diff hist +8 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests →Early demonstrations
12:2612:26, 9 January 2020 diff hist +3 D100 Radio →History
11:2711:27, 9 January 2020 diff hist −18 Link REIT Undid revision 934932263 by Matthew hk (talk) According to SCMP, Albert Cheng article is under opinion section not the news section and this article was 13 Jun, 2014. Both HK GOV and HKEX were more accurate reference than the Cheng's Opinion Article. Tag: Undo

05:4205:42, 29 December 2019 diff hist +138 Link REIT Incorrect and inaccurate Information and reference. Corrected with the information and reference from HK gov and HKEX News.