Jump to content

User contributions for Woonpton

Results for Woonpton talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log

A user with 1,108 edits. Account created on 30 January 2008.

01:3001:30, 4 March 2011 diff hist +495 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Richard Gill engages in original research: add diffs

23:5323:53, 3 March 2011 diff hist +644 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Responses: add response
22:2922:29, 3 March 2011 diff hist +635 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →A small group of editors has exerted disproportionate control over the page content and structure: thanks, re
21:1221:12, 3 March 2011 diff hist +1,607 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →2/3 : 1/3 (refreshment of editors): doesn't belong here, sorry attempt at quick answer
20:2520:25, 3 March 2011 diff hist +312 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →A small group of editors has exerted disproportionate control over the page content and structure: +
20:2020:20, 3 March 2011 diff hist +815 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →A small group of editors has exerted disproportionate control over the page content and structure: not convinced this is so
20:0520:05, 3 March 2011 diff hist +115 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Good faith and disruption: agree
18:0418:04, 3 March 2011 diff hist +1,753 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Comment/question for Sir Fozzie and Elen: Data coming
17:2417:24, 3 March 2011 diff hist −13 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →2/3 : 1/3 (refreshment of editors): fix bad link
17:2117:21, 3 March 2011 diff hist +5,306 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →2/3 : 1/3 (refreshment of editors): Sorry folks, but I couldn't let these misrepresentations stand
14:5214:52, 3 March 2011 diff hist +544 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Wikipedia is not a battleground: comment

18:4318:43, 2 March 2011 diff hist +1,076 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →MHP is a featured article, so what's the problem: clarify
17:2617:26, 2 March 2011 diff hist +546 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Comment/question for Sir Fozzie and Elen: yes and no
16:4516:45, 2 March 2011 diff hist +2,378 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Re: Experts on Wikipedia: please drop this irrelevant argument
16:0216:02, 2 March 2011 diff hist +234 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Richard Gill belittles other editors: add diffs

20:4020:40, 28 February 2011 diff hist +422 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Personal attacks on Glkanter's user and talk pages: strike comments in response to RB's explanations
18:2418:24, 28 February 2011 diff hist +373 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Personal attacks on Glkanter's user and talk pages: add specific diffs +ce
18:0218:02, 28 February 2011 diff hist +81 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Personal attacks on Glkanter's user and talk pages: I do think the actual personal attacks should be removed, but not everything listed in the diffs
17:4717:47, 28 February 2011 diff hist +1,176 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Personal attacks on Glkanter's user and talk pages: don't find this proposal persuasive
16:3516:35, 28 February 2011 diff hist +723 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →2/3 : 1/3 (refreshment of editors): how does this relate to proposal?

01:0101:01, 26 February 2011 diff hist +2,364 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Core content policies: correct misrepresentation

19:1719:17, 25 February 2011 diff hist +800 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Core content policies: not what I said
18:2418:24, 25 February 2011 diff hist +1,031 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Core content policies: not personal
17:2717:27, 25 February 2011 diff hist +641 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Core content policies: Enough, please.
16:4616:46, 25 February 2011 diff hist +904 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Core content policies: important principle
15:4315:43, 25 February 2011 diff hist +108 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Role of the Arbitration Committee: agree AGK
14:3714:37, 25 February 2011 diff hist +1,436 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →2/3 : 1/3 (refreshment of editors): even less in tune with Wikipedia policy and process
04:0604:06, 25 February 2011 diff hist +157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Gabbert →Elisa Gabbert: d

16:1616:16, 24 February 2011 diff hist +307 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Many editors have misused the MHP talk page: important fof,
15:5715:57, 24 February 2011 diff hist +661 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Monty Hall problem article placed on article probation: more emphasis on content policy violations?

16:1516:15, 22 February 2011 diff hist +36 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →How's about you 'Not about content' guys not discuss content?: clearer more
15:4215:42, 22 February 2011 diff hist +32 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →How's about you 'Not about content' guys not discuss content?: clearer
15:3515:35, 22 February 2011 diff hist +447 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →How's about you 'Not about content' guys not discuss content?: agree that arbitrators should avoid content discussions

16:2716:27, 20 February 2011 diff hist −21 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Re: Experts on Wikipedia: ce
16:1316:13, 20 February 2011 diff hist +100 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Comment by Glkanter: thanks (that's all)
16:0916:09, 20 February 2011 diff hist −1,352 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Moved from motions and requests: -
16:0616:06, 20 February 2011 diff hist +1,671 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Workshop →Moved from motions and requests: re: Elen...Thanks for explanation
15:2115:21, 20 February 2011 diff hist +2,391 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Re: Experts on Wikipedia: re
14:1414:14, 20 February 2011 diff hist +38 m Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Experts on Wikipedia: ce for clarity
14:1014:10, 20 February 2011 diff hist +122 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Richard Gill belittles other editors: add diff from today

06:0406:04, 19 February 2011 diff hist +434 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Monty Hall problem/Evidence →Experts on Wikipedia: apparently this point still needs to be made

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Woonpton"