Talk:2019 Kentucky gubernatorial election

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Kentucky Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Attorney-General-Andy-Beshear.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all - It's a three-way race and to date no polls have even included John Hicks. Anyone think it's right to put his picture up until a poll is done with Hicks included, at which point the typical polling threshold kicks in? 216.196.254.34 (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe instead of being disingenuous you mention that Trump literally had 1.2 million votes in 2016 and 2016 had 400,000+ more voters and that literally every other office voted Republican? 108.48.94.223 (talk) 03:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not about the other offices, it is about the race for governor. Trump won with 62% in 2016, Beshear is gonna win with around 49%/50%, that is a major swing. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 03:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it warrants to be mentioned in the intro paragraph. I don't recall many intros comparing a candidate's performance to Donald Trump's. Gubernatorial races are different things entirely. --yeah_93 (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pretending that the Democrat party candidate has won this race. He has not and Bevin not conceded. No need to write an article that is already calling the election. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/kentucky-election-results 62.226.86.167 (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This race has not been called by AP nor has Bevin conceded. Also why do you compare local elections with nationwide contents like the outcome of the US election 2016? Dems hold the KY GOV until 2015 while being deeply unpopular in presidential elections. Not a good comparision.

The results differ between the Top Box and the Results section due to different sources (Popular vote 709,673 / 704,523 Percentage 49.2% / 48.8% vs. 711,955 49.2 and 707,297 48.9). Which is the correct one?--Einar Moses Wohltun (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to protect this page, too much vandalism- Yeungkahchun (talk) 62.226.95.155 02:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+1 to at least semi-protect this article at least for a few days as the obvious tensions around this election cool down. 38.32.56.66 (talk) 16:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it can be unprotected now. It among other things seriously misreports the CNN article about the coming recanvassing process. That needs correction. 67.164.113.165 (talk) 22:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the predictions are too old and should be updated. And I Saw That Someone Removing The Newest(Released 11/5) and Most Accurate(Predicted Democratic Victory) One of Globe Elections United Network, This Sould Be Restored.

hey, just to respond: I was the one who removed that. I just want to point out that GEUN does not seem to exist and has only 31 hits on Google/ a single, small YouTube channel. In addition, your IP address seems to be the only editor ever mentioning GEUN. This suggests you have a close connection with the material, which is bad, and are using Wikipedia to pump up your own organization's notability unjustifiably, which is worse. If GEUN deserves to be here, more than one editor will reference it, and it'll get a page of its own like every major election prediction org- Sabato, 538, Fox, etc.

Pebbleroad (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

973,692 total statewide votes in 2015 versus 1,442,390 in 2019 -- an increase of 468,698 -- computes out to a 48% increase in total statewide votes from 2015 to 2019.Artaxerxes (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Official Portrait of Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Governor Beshear's Official Picture.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Governor-Beshear Official-Picture (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]