Talk:Application firewall

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking / Security Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as High-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: edit history watch purge Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

A more in depth look at this can be found under the wikipedia article "Stateful_firewall" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall . Either that info should be moved here or this should be moved there. I'll leave that to a pro, since i dont know what i'm doing here, but i though someone would like to know. (64.112.206.6 05:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

No dont think this content should be moved to "Stateful Firewall". Rather to about Deep packet inspection.

There seems to be a fundamental confusion here about what's meant by "application". Half of these firewalls are talking about understanding/deducing the protocol (e.g. HTTP), and the other half talk about identifying/validating the application (e.g. Safari) using signed executables and the like. Clearly these technologies are miles apart and shouldn't be confused.

Also are we firewalling all system access (e.g. AppArmour) or just network access? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.57.127.7 (talk) 09:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten parts of the article to separate what is meant by different kinds of application firewalls in attempt to cause less confusion. DavidBailey (talk) 03:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much in the way of coverage for this topic that I could find in google books. This one has a section, but there's not much stuff there for a separate article. Proposing to merge here. Pcap ping 00:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I don't see the point in having any lists of products—it makes the article seem spammy. Any thoughts? — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 03:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think it adds anything to the article. Something could be said about some of these items, but the list is difficult to maintain. Removing it would be fine. Dawnseeker2000 03:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]