Talk:Arkansaurus

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Arkansas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).

Oh boy, have we got some work to do here. For starters, the skepticism section contains weasel-speak and lacks even a single source. I have already placed in a few citations needed, would like some help. The bit on the Arkansaurus itself is better in the citation department, but it seems disproportionately short to the rest of the article. Saji Loupgarou (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the skepticism section appears to derive from the second external link. The editor who created the section in this article must not have seen or did not think much of the feedback page, which backs off quite a bit. If the thing ever does get formally described, I'd suspect that the questions will be mentioned, since he asked the people who are or have been working on it, but I don't know how well the page meets reliable sources. J. Spencer (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arkansaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505140613/http://users.aristotle.net:80/~russjohn/monsters/ms6.html to http://users.aristotle.net/~russjohn/monsters/ms6.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123044345/http://www.dinochick.com/about%20me/HuntARTeropodFoot.pdf to http://www.dinochick.com/about%20me/HuntARTeropodFoot.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505140613/http://users.aristotle.net:80/~russjohn/monsters/ms6.html to http://users.aristotle.net/~russjohn/monsters/ms6.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050305150158/http://rockhoundingar.com:80/dino.html to http://rockhoundingar.com/dino.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]