Talk:Battle of Ashdown

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Norse history and culture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Denmark Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: British / European / Nordic / Medieval This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force Nordic military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page needs some work. The narrative is largely supposition and the Uffington/Ashbury location is now generally discounted. I have tried to clarify this, but the whole thing needs rewriting really Walgamanus 20:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the second paragraph the article says that "The battle was little more than a great clash of shield walls ..." and then "This was a 'pyrrhic victory', for a great many lives were lost on each side... ". This is contradictory. treesmill 13:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Cannot find reputable sources for claim of a pyrrhic victory. This was a bloody battle, indeed, but was not a PV. Am removing. — Molly-in-md (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Large parts of the text on this page seem to be lifted, with only slight editing, from www.berkshirehistory.com, and as such are in breach of copyright. 86.148.170.255 18:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which bits? Verica Atrebatum 19:12, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The comment seems to be correct; after digging around on the Berkshire history site I found this page which has some of the same text. For example, this is from the current article:

Alfred was keen to get to grips with the enemy, but Ethelred decided to spend the ensuing lull in prayer for victory. He left the battlefield for the little church at Aston (Tirrold or Upthorpe) and, despite Alfred’s insistence, he would not return until the priest had finished! The young Prince had to make a decision: should he wait for his brother or commence the fight alone? The troops were on edge and impatient. The Danes had already deployed in an advantageous position, on the higher ground and to let them take the initiative would be to court disaster. Despite his brother’s absence, Alfred gave the command for his own men to charge.

and this is from the website:

Alfred was keen to get to grips with the enemy, but Ethelred decided to spend the ensuing lull in prayer for victory. He left the battlefield for the little church at Aston, and, despite Alfred’s insistence, he would not return until the priest had finished!So the young Prince had to make a decision: should he wait for his brother or fight the battle without him? He could not keep his troops on edge for long. The Danes had already deployed themselves on the higher ground, and to let them charge first would mean certain defeat. So despite his brother’s orders to the contrary, Alfred rode forth and gave the cry for his own men to attack first and the battle to begin.

There may be more; I didn't do an exhaustive search. I won't get to this soon, but will put it on my list. If anyone else has time, please clean up as you see fit. Mike Christie (talk) 02:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am preparing to make some small but necessary stylistic and factual changes, and give some citations. Hopefully this will clarify some of the issues being here discussed and qualify the article to have the citations and verifications tag removed. To begin with, I updated the "Anglo-Saxon" spelling of Ashdown: what was there - "Aschendune" - appeared to be a combination of German spelling and the dative form (as appears in the Chronicles). It is listed a minor edit. Hopefully I will be able to make some other corrections to the satisfaction of those concerned.Delvebelow (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would add to those comments that the sentence "Thousands of bodies covered the chalky slopes." in "Aftermath" does not make a lot of sense when to total headcount for both sides is earlier said to be inferior to 2000.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.69.91.211 (talk) 12:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how much of an impact this battle had on Wales so I'm not sure how to incorporate this into the article, but it seems that the Battle of Bryn Onnen ('Ash Hill') mentioned in all of the Welsh annals and chronicles (as "Cat brin onnen", "Catwren onnan", &c.) is identical with Ashdown. (Here's at least one source backing up the identification, along with a more precise location for the battle: Compton near East Ilsley.) — LlywelynII 21:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Battle of Ashdown/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 22:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)