Talk:Cameroonian Pidgin English

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: Cameroon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Cameroon (assessed as Mid-importance). Languages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shold the article Pigin English be merged into this article? Or perhaps Pigin English should just be deleted? Cardamon 07:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, Pigin English is talking about Entlish pidgin languages throughout Africa. Cameroonian Pidgin English is but one example of a broader category. Instead, I've proposed that Pigin English be merged into Pidgin. See Talk:Pidgin for details. — BrianSmithson 08:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what to do with it. When I previously proposed that, the only response I got at Talk:Pidgin#Suggest merging Pigin English into Pidgin was negative. So I decided to try this, since the page had more content specific to Cameroon than to any other single country. Hmmm, I see there is more discussion there now. User:Bikeable's idea of an article on West African Pidgin English sounds like a good thing for someone other than me to write. Cardamon 09:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just coming across this now. The Pidgin article appears to deal with the general linguistic category, and as such would IMO best stay as is. WRT the English Pidgins, a good case could be made to organize them better. A case could be made to merge the Cameroonian and Nigerian Pidgin articles if they are close enough to consider together as West African Pidgin English (with ref to any differences, of course in the new article). This is commonly the case with the vast majority of crossborder African languages - you don't have separate articles for Hausa in Nigeria, Niger and Ghana for instance. I'm not familiar enough with the pidgin category to say much about English pidgins more generally and whether we might possibly be looking at 3 levels of articles: 1) pidgin in general; 2) English pidgins worldwide; 3) West African pidgin, or specifically Nigerian & Cameroonian pidgins. --A12n 20:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that all the Pidgin English articles should be combined under the single 'Pidgin English' header. It should remain separate from the 'Pidgin' article as it does not refer directly to the same thing. It's easier for someone searching for one or the other if they don't have to wade through material that isn't of interest. They can always click-through if they want to know more. --Deke42 18:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cameroonian Pidgin English. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070913062233/http://www.une.edu.au/langnet/definitions/cameroon.html to http://www.une.edu.au/langnet/definitions/cameroon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]