Talk:Christina Aguilera discography

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christina Aguilera discography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days

	Christina Aguilera discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 29, 2013 Featured list candidate Promoted

List of Christina Aguilera B-sides and unreleased songs was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 2008-07-27 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Christina Aguilera discography. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christina Aguilera High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christina Aguilera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christina Aguilera on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christina AguileraWikipedia:WikiProject Christina AguileraTemplate:WikiProject Christina AguileraChristina Aguilera articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Discographies This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Genie in a Bottle#"Genie 2.0"|Genie 2.0]] The anchor (#"Genie 2.0") is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Reflection (Mulan song)#2020 live action version|Reflection]] The anchor (#2020 live action version) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

88marcus has replaced original sources for sales of Christina Aguilera (17 million, The Daily Telegraph) and Stripped (12 million, Rolling Stone) with sources from Contactmusic and VH1, giving the reason that "Its about the more accurate according to the album certifications and chart performance. Also, Rolling Stones is not Nielsen soundscan or IFPI, they don't know anything about sales too. The debut performed poorly outside the USA (see its charts)". I am not saying that he was right or wrong. I just want him to address my concerns,

What makes Contactmusic.com more reliable than printed media outlets The Daily Telegraph and Rolling Stone?

If "Rolling Stone is not Nielsen soundscan or IFPI", then are Contactmusic.com and VH1?

The biography on Contactmusic.com only updates until 2011. Also, the author of this biography is unknown, therefore no credibility can be attributed down to.

The biography on VH1 is exactly the same with Wikipedia page of Christina Aguilera. This biography also contains information before 2010.

Given that authors of The Daily Telegraph and Rolling Stone are responsible for there works rather than freely-written biographies on Contactmusic and VH1, could 88marcus address my concerns above? Other members can feel free to discuss and point out what I or he or anybody is missing. Regards, HĐ (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same case of Thriller by Michael Jackson. A lot of sources claim that this album sold around 100 million copies worldwide, but that doesn't mean that it's true, those sales are created by record companies, fans and even Wikipedia users for commercial purposes, to value the artist. See the debut album case, this album performed poorly outside the non-english language countries, it was a top 10 in only 4 countries, certified only platinum in Europe (1 million copies shipped) and after the promo of its last single, the record company told the the album sold 12.5 million copies worldwide linklink (there's a lot of sites that claim 12kk in between 2000-2007). How this album could sold 8 million copies outside USA (17kk ww)? See its certifications, there's no way this could be true. I think the 14kk it's the more accurate, the user @Bluesatellite: made this edition (14kk sold) and argued the same. If we have sales from IFPI wouldn't be different, the others sites only repeted what they read in other sites, sometimes using Wikipedia as a source, but none of them work with worldwide sales accounting.--88marcus (talk) 20:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point, but I am particularly concerned with contactmusic and VH1's reliability. Especially with the VH1 article, which looks completely like a Wikipedia rip-off. This 2006 article claimed both albums sold 12.5m and 9.5m, respectively, but that data is too outdated imo. — HĐ (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both albums were out of the charts at the time of the source, how could those albums sold another three and five millions copies worldwide?! As per the IFPI, Stripped was #21 of 2002 with 3,9m copies sold and #16 of 2003 with 3,5m, making it 7,4 million copies shipped by the end of 2003. Copies sold in early 2004 were already shipped during 2003 Xmas season and after that it wasn’t selling that well anymore.--88marcus (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please update Worldwide sales of Christina Aguilera's Albums using the "Total CSPC" in the link, the link is " http://chartmasters.org/2017/03/cspc-christina-aguilera-popularity-analysis/22/ " .. 183.78.95.253 (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Unfortunately, ChartMasters a self-published blog, and as such it cannot be cited as a reliable source (see WP:BLOGS). LifeofTau 04:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove Bionic World Sales, *World: 1,400,000 (Units)^[1] because it is using deprecated chart (Websites to avoid), chartmasters.org - Falls under WP:SPS, and there's no indication of where the figures are from.

Please remove Lotus World Sales, *World: 1,000,000 (Units)^[2] because it is using deprecated chart (Websites to avoid), chartmasters.org - Falls under WP:SPS, and there's no indication of where the figures are from. Remixbxxch (talk) 11:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, replaced both with {{citation needed}}. Fish+Karate 12:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please classify correctly the singles "We Remain", "Haunted Heart", "Loyal Brave True" and "Reflection (2020)" as promo singles. All these singles were released as promo singles and aren't in the right section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.176.112.254 (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]