Talk:HMAS Voyager (D04)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / South Pacific / Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Australia: Military history / Maritime Mid‑importance HMAS Voyager (D04) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Shipwrecks Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: edit history watch purge To Do Lady Elizabeth (1879) Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed! Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Still adding more information Discuss desired additions -None

This article has been tagged as not citing its refences. What the? Nick Thorne 21:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone with more knowledge of their fate than I might like to add a section to this article about the history of the survivors of this tragic accident and their struggle for recognition and compensation. Nick Thorne ^talk 08:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Third section of this article says 82 were killed. Discussion of the accident says "14 officers and 67 sailors," which is only 81. Which figure is correct? 208.47.164.226 (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plus one civilian dockworker mentioned in the sentance after the one you quoted. -- saberwyn 21:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"On 12 March 1956, several gallantry awards were conferred..." I guess that should be 1966? Or '76? Anyone know for sure? Rumiton (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The London Gazette listed the date as 19 March 1965...our error is probably a case of too-fast fingers. Now fixed. -- saberwyn 23:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

plenty of images on web, including naval site Dave Rave (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This ship never operated under the Australian White Ensign, it only ever flew the Imperial/ Royal Navy white ensign during its service in the RAN. Should the box be changed? Ozdaren (talk) 08:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]