Talk:HMS Actaeon (1778)

HMS Actaeon (1778) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 3, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern / Napoleonic era This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Actaeon (1778)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 15:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Images properly licensed
• Link launched, West Indies in the lede; add links for gun deck and keel in the infobox

• Done.

• for a repair suggest to be repaired

• Done.

• Not sure that the bits about the later ships of the class are really relevant to this ship

• Removed.

• deleted the inflation calculators

• Done.

• to peacefully occupy occupy "it"

• I believe "leaving it for the British to peacefully occupy" to be correct?

• Quite correct.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nicely done

@Sturmvogel 66: Hi, thanks for the review. Have responded above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe @Sturmvogel 66 I have noticed that 'Jamaica Station' in the lead is linked to a train station in New York City. I recommend fixing this with an appropriate link (I'm not fixing it myself as I am not educated on the topic) HoHo3143 (talk) 10:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HoHo3143: Thanks for the heads up! Have fixed. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe thank you! HoHo3143 (talk) 08:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]