Jump to content

Talk:Jutarnji list

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scandals

[edit]

Do not vandalize by removing sourced information!--78.3.4.155 (talk) 11:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jutarnji list. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jutarnji list. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV material

[edit]

I managed to stumble upon this article and was treated with the following paragraph in the article's lead:

In a book named "The Importance of Media Integrity" which was published as a part of "South East European Media Observatory" project, Jutarnji List was rated as serving as a "ruling party bulletin".[1] Ruling party at the time was right-wing Hrvatska Demokratska Zajednica (HDZ) which is convicted for criminal activity and corruption.[2] At the time of writing HDZ is still in power and Jutarnji List has since shown no restraint in supporting the criminal status quo. Jutarnji List which is marketed as left-leaning is as such engaged in widespread public opinion manipulation campaigns by spreading HDZ propaganda while marketing itself as liberal and social-democratic.

This is clearly a violation of WP:NPOV, so I deleted it. However, the comment about the newspaper being criticized as a ruling party bulletin is potentially includable, so with the help of Google Translate, I decided to seek out the actual comment in the linked source (located here). I did find the comment in question on page 78 ("Jutarnji neka vrsta biltena vlasti." ("Jutarnji is a kind of government bulletin.")). However, it is not clear which political party it was referring to, nor what year the comment was made, so I'm not sure if the above paragraph is even correct in saying that Jutarnji was defending the HDZ. If someone who actually understands Croatian wants to check the document, then you could potentially include the relevant comment under the "Controversies" section. Mlb96 (talk) 07:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned, Jutarnji list never was a bulletin of any ruling party. It was pretty close to the Račan's government in its first year, but not ever more. The daily fought the Tuđman's regime as illiberal and in Nineties was, with weekly Globus (in the same publishing house EPH) and with Feral Tribune, the main bastion of opposition to HDZ in the Croatian printed press. The investigative journalists in Jutarnji list discovered some main scandals of HDZ, for instance gave space to Ankica Lepej's leak of unreported bank account of Tuđman's wife Ankica Tuđman. Jutarnji list discovered and published details of alleged corruption scandals involving then HDZ's foreign minister Miomir Žužul, and he resigned. During the actual Plenković's government Jutarnji list initiated or with its investigations contributed to several ministers' resignation.
Take in consideration that I have been a correspondent of Jutarnji list from 2000 on, so I might be in a conflict of interests. Anyway, there are administrators who speak Croatian and follow Croatian press, so they can confirm my point of view. --Inoslav Bešker (talk) 05:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Popović, Helena (2014). "Istraživanje o integritetu medija — hrvatska". Značaj medijskog integriteta: vraćanje medija i novinarstva u službu javnosti: 57–123.
  2. ^ FIMI Media izricanje presude, retrieved 2021-06-17
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jutarnji_list&oldid=1207884018"