Talk:Kyle Carey

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Roots music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I removed the “proposed deletion” template since I have now added very many references and links to independent reliable sources and hopefully now adequately addressed the previous concern:

“No indication of coverage in independent reliable sources, appears to fail WP:BIO”

Caoimhin (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I’m in a bit of dilemma here. When I created the article, it quickly had a “proposed for deletion” placed on it by Everymorning because of “No indication of coverage in independent reliable sources”. So to address this, I researched and included a list of 19 reviews by many indepenendent reliable sources from many countries, and also 5 interviews including BBC Radio (sole guest on two two-hour programmes). Altogether I believe that these show that this is an artist of importance.

However, all these links to reviews and interviews have just been deleted by Epicgenius because of WP:NOTNEWS policy. (Is it the fact that I recently added publication dates to the review links which sparked the deletion?) So now I don’t know what to do. Can I simply assume that the remaining 5 references are enough to establish the artist’s importance and prevent the deletion of the article? Or is it enough that the links to the reviews and interviews are in the history? Or should I add statements, “which received excellent reviews by critics”, and “which again received excellent reviews” to the article, as an excuse to move some of the links back in, but under References instead of External links? Or do I have to pick through the reviews looking for the choicest adulation by the most respected critics to quote and reference in the article?

--Caoimhin (talk) 02:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kyle Carey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141210034652/http://www.fulbright.ca/alumni/alumni-news/featured-fulbrighters/kyle-carey.html to http://www.fulbright.ca/alumni/alumni-news/featured-fulbrighters/kyle-carey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]