Talk:Murusade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Murusade article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Murusade was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 22, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Somalia Low‑importance

	Somalia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somalia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somalia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomaliaWikipedia:WikiProject SomaliaTemplate:WikiProject SomaliaWikiProject Somalia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yemen Low‑importance

	Yemen portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethiopia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AI Cleanup

This article is within the scope of WikiProject AI Cleanup, a collaborative effort to clean up artificial intelligence-generated content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AI CleanupWikipedia:WikiProject AI CleanupTemplate:WikiProject AI CleanupAI Cleanup articles

GA Review

Unsuccessful. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Murusade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Solanif (talk · contribs) 15:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 12:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This GA review is unfortunately going to be a quickfail, as the article is a long way from meeting several GA criteria. The main problems are the use of unreliable sources, uncited material, and a generally promotional tone. Let's take a look at the first section, paragraph by paragraph (citation numbers refer to this version).

First paragraph: mostly uncited. The only citation, which claims to verify "The Murusade are an integral part of the Karanle", is largely inaccessible, shows no sign of verifying the claim, and, being a PDF of uncertain origin on a random hosting website, is not a reliable source.
Second paragraph: uncited, promotional, confusing sentence at end. Citation 8 does not verify "holds significant importance as one of the most prominent sub-clans. It is noteworthy". Citation 9 does not verify "share close kinship ties with other Samaale clans".
Third paragraph: first sentence cites a 130-year old source for a claim in the present tense ("is also revered") which is obviously inappropriate. This source is in Italian, and needs a quote per WP:RSUEQ.
Fourth paragraph: ends with an uncited, promotional sentence. The paragraph editorialises unnecessarily ("interestingly", "it is worth mentioning that") Citation 14, hosted on a WP:SPS website, shows no signs of being reliable, and supports material that needs to be clearly presented as a folktale.
Fifth paragraph: highly promotional (there are three separate mentions of El-Buur district being historically important). Citation 15, an 81-page document, needs a page number, and doesn't appear to verify the claim. Citation 16 does not support "Their influence has been extensive in moulding the historical, political, and economic development of these regions. Of particular significance is their predominant position". I have corrected citation 18's incorrect formatting, but it needs a page number.
Sixth paragraph: uncited, promotional sentence at end. Citation 19 mentions the Habar Gidir clan along with the Abgaal, but the article chooses to omit them. Citation 20 is an unreliable blog. Citation 21 verifies almost none of the material it claims to support.
Seventh paragraph: highly promotional.

Thus, the article is far, far below GA standards, and is almost start-class in its current form. It needs significant improvement to get anywhere near GA status. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.