Talk:Rakeshprasad

This article was nominated for deletion on January 22, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Hinduism: Krishnaism / Swaminarayan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Swaminarayan (assessed as Low-importance).

I believe that we should include text to state that the acharyaship of Rakeshprasad is currently in dispute. The matter has already been up to the Indian Supreme Court once and the Court vacated the removal of Ajendraprasadji Maharaj who was Rakeshprasad's predecessor in the gaadi. ^[1] 216.188.246.72 21:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)SS[reply]

It does not look like you have read the Supreme Court of India's decision! Better get an attorney to explain to you before you use the words such as “vacate”. It seems your knowledge is limited and based only on here say and not facts. The Court only disallowed him to amend the case currently being litigated in the Nadiad Court as of Today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.93.190 (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion on the title of this page at Talk: Tejendraprasad Pande. AroundTheGlobe (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be moved to Rakeshprasad, with redirect from the old article name. Honorifics, degrees, salutations, forms of address and titles do not belong in article names except to the minimum extent necessary for disambiguation from other articles about similarly named individuals.LeadSongDog come howl! 19:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currently ongoing discussion on Talk:Acharya Maharajshree Tejendraprasad Pande. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 06:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rakeshprasad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080606162947/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/articleshow/37796601.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/37796601.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rakeshprasad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090105180708/http://vadtal.com/acharyas-rakeshprasadji-maharaj.html to http://www.vadtal.com/acharyas-rakeshprasadji-maharaj.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Give me proof 'Ajendraprasadji was removed, Rakeshprasad is his successor, etc Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 08:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 'Lynx' I am afraid your wikipedia is responsible for spreading this wrong information to the world about Shri Ajendraprasadji.... Mr. Rakeshprasad is not at all acharya or connected to the SWAMINARAYAN Sect .. Your claim of removing Shree Ajendraprasadji and appointing Mr. Rakeshprasad is baseless and fake and totally wrong and misleading the more than1000000 devotees across the earth. Give high Court judgement copy. Give proof as Nautam as monk...He is outcasted like BAPS people the shopkeepers having no spiritual or religious principles in line with Lord Shri SWAMINARAYAN

Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 09:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The INFOBOX identified him as the ninth Acharya.

I looked at all the sources, none of which explicitly stated this. It might be an inference from this source, but such a claim deserves more solid sourcing. Prompted by ticket:2018022110011385--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to let editors know that in the last day or so OTRS has been spamflooded by supporters of Ajendraprasadji demanding changes to this article. The emails are being deleted without response, but for interested parties, the demand being made is that the listing of Rakeshprasad as active Acharya be removed, along with the mention of the High Court's removal of Ajendraprasadji as Acharya. I make no comment as to the validity of these demands, but am just noting here for the record that they have been made (and will continued to be ignored by OTRS, since it is not in OTRS's remit to make changes to articles on request). Yunshui ^雲_水 12:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

vadtal desh shree lakshminarayan dev gadi acharya is P.P.1008 acharya shree ajendraprasadji maharaj — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.190.186.134 (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following are the absolute facts and truths,

1. There is NO JUDGEMENTS of any courts stating that, His Holiness Acharya Shree Ajendraprasadji of Vadtal Lakshminarayan Dev Gadi (Southern Diocese) of Swaminarayan Sect has been removed as an Acharya.

2. Some disgruntle elements, however is trying to disturb the established customs and privilege of "Acharya Parampara" which exists since ~ 220 years and have filed a civil suite in Nadiad Civil Court which is till pending. For your reference, special civil suite no. is 156/2002

3. In the regard of this suite Hon'ble supreme court of India has observed in CIVIL APPEAL NO.3380 OF 2005

        " The dispute centers round the question as to weather the removal of Ajendraprasadji Narendraprasadji Pandey from the post of Acharya on the basis of purported resolution dated 11.5.2002 passed by a body calling itself Satsangha  Maha Sabha was valid.  Intimately linked with this core issue is the legality of the action taken to install Rakesh Prasadji Mahendra Prasadji. The dispute relates to Shri Swaminarayan Sampradaya, Vadtal Gaddi. ...

4. Accordingly the trial court vide order dated 28/09/2005 has framed the Issue i.e.

    "1. Whether pltf. Proves that the resolution No.4 dated 11-5-2002 at sarangpur is legal and valid ?  "  in this regard.

which is still under Court's consideration and the Plentiffs have not yet proved the legality of such 'purported resolution'. nor the Hon'ble Court has declared that the said resolution was valid and H.H. Acharya Shree Ajendraprasadji has been/ or is removed as an Acharya.

5.Even today the name of H.H. Acharya Shree Ajendraprasadji Maharaj is mentioned in all official records and even in 'Public Trust Register' maintained by 'Charity Commissioner's Office' as 'The Acharya' and Custodian Trustee of Vadtal Trust. (i.e. Kheda A-1417).

6. So it is absolutely wrong and inappropriate to say that 'An order by the Gujarat High Court removed his predecessor, Ajendraprasad, and appointed Rakeshprasad as acharya, in his place on the secret requirement of the satsang mahasabha headed by monks namely a Nautam Swami.'

7. Vadtal temple is not entire sampraday or Shree LaxminarayanDev Gaddi, its just only one part along crores and lacs and large number of followers others. So only then calling someone as so-called acharya does not have any relevancy leaving apart the relation and/or impact on entire sampraday-the swaminarayan sect.

Last but not least, we submit with authenticity that,

Shree Swaminarayan Sampraday is and founded on the tenates and Principles laid by Lord Shree Swaminarayan, the founder Himself and no one has any rights or is / are authorized including the plaintiffs, and/or body of few disgruntle elements calling itself Satsangha MahaSabha to destruct, defame or change any kinds of, at any point of time, under any circumstances the pure pious principles and traditions set , established and approved accepted by law and also by Crores of devotees and followers.

"Shree Ajendraprasdji is ONLY existing Acharya of Lakshminarayandev Gadi Vadtal, Southern Diocese, Mr. Rakeshprasad has no connections with this sect as Acharya or any ways else."

Unfortunately someone has given false and wrong inputs which has / could not been checked before uploading , therefore its humble request to correct above relevant facts and absolute truth as mentioned in this page for maintaining the dignity and authenticity of wikipedia. Thanks much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.123.171 (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shree Ajendraprasdji is ONLY existing Acharya of Lakshminarayandev Gadi Vadtal, Southern Diocese, Mr. Rakeshprasad has no connections with this sect as Acharya or any ways else."

Mr nautam is not a monk in swaminarayan sect. He is Vimukh

Dharm sabha is not a authority to appoint aacharya

case is pending in court how can you say acharya Ajendraprasdji is removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:8003:C9BB:C9DF:7CDE:5051:89F7 (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]