Talk:Timothy (grass)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

timothy grass looks like weat but its not weat its grass

Wheat itself is a grass. —Keenan Pepper 14:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, Phleum currently redirects to Velsen, but I believe the botanical use is far more common. Would anyone like to change that page, since I have no experience with Wikipedia editing? --62.85.6.24 16:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

maybe I'm just out of my mind exhausted, but why is there an epigraph of John Le Carré's "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy". I don't see timothy in this at all, and what does grass have to do with espionage novels?

Nice picture you got here, but it´s actually alopecurus pratensis and NOT phleum pratense! Will see if I can take a picture of p.p. in june this year and send it to you. Greetings, Bob

The left picture on the main page does not show Phleum pratense but Alopecurus pratensis! leif.sigbo@telia.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.198.210.178 (talk) 06:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timothy-grass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717004923/http://www.bsbi.org.uk/identification.html to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/identification.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]