Talk:WikiPilipinas

A fact from WikiPilipinas appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that WikiPilipinas is the first online encyclopedia based in the Philippines? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/September.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Books: Reference works This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Last night, I saw on GMA-7 news about this Wikipiniana, and this morning I read it as headline in our Philippine Daily Inquirer, Inquirer.net Online. This is a great contribution to our Filipino researchers (students) and even for us lawyers and judges.

--Florentino floro 15:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The profile link of WikiPilipas shows that Vibal, Grimaldo and Ursua with the team were responsible for its birth and metamorphosis.^[1]- --Florentino floro (talk) 09:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be mentioned somewhere in the article that WikiPilipinas actually promotes POV articles and Original Research. Shrumster 16:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it should be here. --Howard the Duck 06:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to add this, since this is the only existing link or verifiable source which points to the central fact that WikiPilipinas was born because of Esther Vibal, the mother of Gaspar Vibal, and the incumbent owner of Vibal Publishing. Moreover, it was octogenarian book publisher Esther A. Vibal, founder of Vibal Publishing House (VPHI), who learned about online publishing and knowledge sharing. She introduced the concepts through Filipiniana.net and WikiPilipinas.org, the world’s biggest Philippine encyclopedia available on the Web.Inquirer.net, Business lessons from an octogenarian - --Florentino floro (talk) 10:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not notable enough. --Bentong Isles (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WikiPilipinas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071111055835/http://www.businessmirror.com.ph:80/08232007/headlines04.html to http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/08232007/headlines04.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WikiPilipinas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016141941/http://isulong-seoph.aboutmyrecovery.com:80/2007/08/23/wikipilipinas-reaches-100000-visitor-mark-in-24-hours/ to http://isulong-seoph.aboutmyrecovery.com/2007/08/23/wikipilipinas-reaches-100000-visitor-mark-in-24-hours/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tried visiting the site lately, but as of now it is no longer responding. It limped and zombied along for the past few years, the only significant edits being those from some serial hoaxer whose name I won't mention. Can anyone confirm that Vibal has discontinued support for the site? Blake Gripling (talk) 04:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]