Talk:Wizard of Oz experiment

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I am neither a psychologist or a sociologist, but someone should fix this article, and focus it onto the subject instead of going off onto tangents. Angryapathy (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As someone with expertise in the field, I found this article very useful. I don't see the interesting history here as a tangent. I was pleased to see who'd authored much of it. Just what wikepedia needs. Gilbert Cockton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.97.217.238 (talk) 17:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Off the top of my head, the once-popular Indie game Sleep is Death would be a fine entry in an "In Popular Culture" section that I believe this article should have. And I am sure there are plenty of other things as well, no doubt. --NeatNit (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What would the opposite be? What would be called when a person believes they are communicating with a person, but that person is actually communicating with an autonomous computer system? The only thing I can think of would be called Failing the Turing Test. What would be a more applicable name? Nutster (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase, "a testing or iterative design methodology" is ambiguous, maybe wrong. For one, testing and iterative are not opposites. I dont understand the intent well enough to correct the phrase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marius63 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]