Talk:Wolf 1061c

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Why are we ripping images from other systems reuploading as if it is about this planet? Seriously? We can do better than this. Davidbuddy9 Talk  22:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

they are not portrayed as actual photographs but diagrams. BatteryIncluded

@BatteryIncluded: I was refering to the images from this revision and earlier, I mostly fixed those now. (The old lead was an impression of a completely inhospital exoplanet HD 219134 b) Davidbuddy9 Talk  02:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see, Thank you for that. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This diff removes a jaunt through PHL claims that are not even properly contextualized (PHL is not defined in the article, for example). The ranking of the planet is not noticed by any third-party sources. Just leave this bit out until we have citations to it. Thanks.

jps (talk) 17:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Proxima b has been discovered as the closest potentially habitable planet, text on this page needs to change. E.g. "This makes it the closest known potentially habitable planet to Earth, yielding interest from astronomers" is no longer accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabraham mw (talk • contribs) 20:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]