Most of the edits[4] I make on Wikipedia are simple copyedits; but I once strove to go above-and-beyond with the linguistics articles, since they've given me so much. In doing so, I learned firsthand just how toxic Wikipedia's community is, and have since quit making large edits.
This user thinks that registration should be required to edit articles.
This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article. Details here.
This user supports the use of gender-neutral language when it reasonably exists as an alternative to a common gendered word.
se hirm ser hirmself
If this user could come up with standard words to replace the singular they, them, their, and themselves/themself, they would respectively be se, hirm, ser, and hirmself.
This user recognizes that "data", "media", and "agenda" have become incorporated into English as singular nouns.
"There's" with a plural subject
This user knows that "there's" with a plural subject is a pervasive grammatical error. There'sThere are too many people making this mistake. Don't be one of them.
whom
This user insists upon using whom wherever it is called for, and fixes the errors of whomever he sees.
A, B, and A and B
This user uses the serial commaunless its inclusion is confusing.
.svg){kind=icon}