User talk:24.115.255.37

Vandalism is pretty much never my intent when I edit Wikipedia. If I make a mistake, please calmly let me know on this talk page and I will listen to you. Also, I may create a Wikipedia account sometime in the future, which will be indicated by a sudden stop in editing from this IP. When I do make an account, I will not tell you its username because you don't need to know. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Babegriev. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Splatoon (video game) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Babegriev (talk) 19:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Babegriev. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lanthanide have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not add a good article template to an article that has not undergone a review per WP:GAN. You can find information on how to nominate that article there. Babegriev (talk) 23:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Swass. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Babegriev (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

What do you think is vandalism? -24.115.255.37

Hello, I'm SWinxy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Link (The Legend of Zelda) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. SWinxy (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

so according to something like the 3rr, it says u need to get reverted 3 times to get blocked, is that right? i only edited the page twice and it was because i didnt know the difference between "hyrulean" and "hylian" and wasnt trying to vandalize (most of my edits are good faith edits/just fixing spelling/grammar). 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been changing this for years, 3RR is simply a bright rule in ongoing edit wars. -- ferret (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok ill stop anyway do u play zelda 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ill stop when my block ends in a year because i googled the difference; hyrulean is the correct term. also i dont need to be unblocked, i was just asking a question.

Also on Typhoon Marge, there is a grammar error; In the first paragraph, it says:

"Although it was a category three typhoon, Marge took the record of being the most biggest cyclone from 1951 for 28 years, until it got preceded by Typhoon Tip in 1979, having doubled the size."

Can you fix it saying "most biggest" and make it just say "biggest"? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If i were to ask to be unblocked, i would try to submit an appeal. (just so you know not to unblock me) 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can you fix the grammar error on Typhoon Marge (1951) please? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ill fix it ItsMeKeys (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thx 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, it says: "A few days later, the cyclone approached Ireland as a large and intense a European windstorm." Can you remove the "a" from when it says "a European windstorm"? I can't do it because: 1. the page is semi-protected. 2: i am blocked. Can someone fix it like how @ItsMeKeys fixed the error on Typhoon Marge? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, it says: "A few days later, the cyclone approached Ireland as a large and intense a European windstorm." Can you remove the "a" from when it says "a European windstorm"? I can't do it because: 1. the page is semi-protected. 2: i am blocked. Can someone fix it like how @ItsMeKeys fixed the error on Typhoon Marge? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure ill do it. ItsMeKeys (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tommorow ItsMeKeys (talk) 03:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you didnt do it 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

holidays were crazy lol.honestly i think you should just appeal your ban if it bugs you so much ItsMeKeys (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it was done anyway+the page is also semi protected i think for like 2 more weeks so i might just create an acct tbh 24.115.255.37 (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You, the person behind the computer, are blocked. Creating an account will result in it being blocked as well. Appeal your block as per the instructions in the block template first. -- ferret (talk) 18:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i highly encourage you to appeal the block,as your recent actions in bringing up grammer mistakes show that you do not intend to harm wikipedia ItsMeKeys (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to appeal my block if and only if I have to create an account before my block ends. If not, I will just wait until the block ends, since I seem to be only one who cares about the grammar errors. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be autoblocked if you create it before your block ends,because that's considered block evasion

ItsMeKeys (talk) 03:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if i want to create an acct first ill try to appeal my block 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have diarrhea and this comment was typed in the bathroom while i was on the toilet 24.115.255.37 (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i know about block evasion lol, i got banned on scratch for evading a ban on an alt of mine, but the alt got banned for impersonating myself so i basically got banned for nothing 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 24.115.255.37 (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what. ItsMeKeys (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

one of my alt accounts on scratch got banned for no reason and my main got banned for evading the block 💀 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm MichaelMaggs. Your recent edit(s) to the page Mondegreen appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Layd" is in original text. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay. I googled it and it said laid, tbh tho i dont know everything, i was just saying cuz layd is bad spelling lol 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re, your discussion. I am actually writing a paper on this, based on what we think we know about the hypothetical Element 164. essentially there is evidence of superheavy elements such as Berkelium and more familar ones like Techetium in stars, implying the decay of much more massive elements well beyond the "Island of Stability". This could be explainable as asteroids containing them (presumably from colliding neutron stars or other phenomena) impacting the star's surface and disintegrating. Now what we do know is that Uranium is somewhat stable but the r-process can't by itself explain the isotopic ratios observed in nature. Laforgium is actually of sufficient density to explain the anomalous mass of some asteroids and Psyche may contain quite large amounts of them making it worth investigating if these elements could be found on Earth in meteorites. I've also looked into the possibility that superheavy elements may have properties not found in nature such as the inner electrons radiating energy as infrared light as an additional method of achieving meta-stability and electron pairing occuring with relatively simple compounds ie superconductivity well above room temperature. It could well be that the magnetic field of some large "super-Earth" planets may be enhanced considerably by this mechanism if the local geology permits, providing a mechanism for life to evolve on sub optimal planets near flare stars. 91.190.161.160 (talk) 03:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is Laforgium (my guess is that it is the name you'd propose for 164 if you are the discoverer)

Anyway, that's cool. I'll be sure to check it out when you're done with it, just send me the link once it's done! 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Sandbox. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk me) 18:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I won't do it again and besides I thought that that page was a sandbox talk page, as noted by the template found on it. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism was not my intent. The intent of that edit was to let people know NOT to vandalize the article to add things about the Gen Alpha slang "Sigma". A similar note, for example, is found in Dream Island to get people to not vandalize that article to be about BFDI. Both notes are hidden so that they only show up when source editing (if the notes were added correctly, which I am pretty sure they were)

EDIT: The original message was removed 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong With all due respect, I feel like it would be kind of harsh to label this as vandalism. It might've not been constructive, but it seems like good-faith. Feel free to correct me. There might be some background here that I don't know about or something. GoldRomean (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a WP:CIR issue rather than pure vandalism... ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Dossor, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. This edit summary is unacceptable per WP:BNTV. You've been already been warned multiple times about your edit summary. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 23:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll stop. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Testing redirects please delete as a g2 test page, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ternera (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The page was mainly meant to see if I could redirect to an external page and/or user page 24.115.255.37 (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdann52 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immediate Murder Professionals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mdann52 (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used the article wizard, check AfC/redirects 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 24.115.255.37! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mdann52 (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Immediate Murder Professionals, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ternera (talk) 21:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, but as a G7 instead of G2. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to your contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. You happened to open the page as I was in the middle of fulfilling the user's request so it appeared that the page already existed (it didn't before I started). I reverted your comments to prevent confusion. Sorry for the mixup! Garsh (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh lol 24.115.255.37 (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are a bit more hard core than we generally prefer. Appreciate the help with vandalism, but please tone down the edit summaries. Even the Cabal doesn't have any professional assassins on retainer... (I think). -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Immediate Murder Professionals are not real; my edit summaries are not serious. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Neither was my reference to the Cabal. But yeah, the edit summaries are a bit on the edgy side. Thanks again for the help with vandalism. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Related, you may wanna stop reverting on Ducks are birds' talk page. It just gives admins more work when it comes to revdel. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 04:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I stopped. His talk page access got revoked, so he can't do anything more. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your help fighting vandalism but please stop arguing with that Daiji Igarashi user. The more you're replying to his insults, the more worse it gets. Also, looking at your past comments towards blocked users, you may want to see WP:BNTV and WP:RBI. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I was going to log off anyway. It's 1:29 AM. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 24.115.255.37. You have new messages at Talk:Isotopes of flerovium.
Message added 12:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^Complex/_Rational 12:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i won't do it again 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Myrealnamm. I noticed that you recently removed content from Khuldabad without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 23:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content I removed was unsourced and appeared to be self promotion. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One second, let me take a look. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 23:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius Thank you for reverting it! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 23:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

anti dionysius already reverted your reversion of my edit 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nvm 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Teddy bear—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok 24.115.255.37 (talk) 05:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't know if you know this already, but users are allowed to blank their talk pages, with a few exceptions. See WP:BLANKING for more info. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I did not know that, but now I do. I will be sure to remember that when I patrol recent changes in the future 24.115.255.37 (talk) 04:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Self-trout

Hello, 24.115.255.37. You have new messages at ComplexRational's talk page.
Message added 20:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

^Complex/_Rational 20:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve List of musical symbols! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! C F A 💬 00:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will probably make an account soon, but I will likely not tell you the username. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Self-trout

some random ip and ae245 have been edit warring on Marc Cucurella and i tried to revert an edit by the ip but i didn't pay much attention and accidentally tried to revert ae245's edit (ae245 is the good guy in the edit war) and i didnt notice until i got stopped by the edit filter lmao 24.115.255.37 (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have recently contributed to Wikipedia a lot recently, I suggest that you make an account so that, even if your IP changes, your contributions will stay with your account. By the way, thank you for dealing with that LTA that I was tracking down a week ago. Cyclonical (talk) 03:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to make an account soon. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 12:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell your parents to email the oversight team, do not revert the edit yourself because then the personal information may be linked with your IP address. Zxcv6666 (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will likely make an account within the next few days, so then it wouldn't be linked with my IP. I will not tell you my account when I make it, though. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 04:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, my parents aren't really big fans of me editing Wikipedia, so I doubt they would email the oversight team if I asked them to... 24.115.255.37 (talk) 04:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you do create an account, don't give out the times because then it will leak out your time zone. Zxcv6666 (talk) 05:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh 24.115.255.37 (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I removed the speedy deletion tag on Draft:Olwethu Dlame because A7 applies for pages in the mainspace (without the starting "Draft:" at the title) per WP:ACSD. Perhaps G11 would be more appropriate, if you see fit. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 00:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was debating whether to do G11 or A7. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch with this possible username violation. I've reported to WP:UAA and left a notice on their talk page. — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thx 24.115.255.37 (talk) 04:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeffed. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thx 24.115.255.37 (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]