User talk:AlexGraal

Hello! AlexGraal, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Ocaasi (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vaghy String Quartet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 02:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent job! ^__^

Abigail was here :D _{Talk to Me. Email Me.} 03:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Hi there Alex, and first I want to thank you for your work at AfC. It's a tough job, but someone has to do it. Now, an editor came to the AfC help desk asking about the above article, and while I haven't commented there yet I just want to tell you that formatting is generally not a valid reason to decline an article. In this case the submission was nowhere near being accepted anyway (reference and promotional stuff), and not only is wikifying very minor but just saying "This is not in correct format" really doesn't help the submitter. In the future, please try not to use that as a decline reason unless the article is just so abysmally bad that it's unreadable (if there are other concerns, use those and if the article is good, fix the format yourself or leave a comment saying that you think it should be approved once another reviewer fixes it up). Cheers, Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 14:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This has popped up at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Myron Orfield. Again, I appreciate your work but very minor formatting fixes and a lack of categories is not a reason to decline, just like they aren't a reason to AfD a real article. If you feel comfortable, please make those fixes yourself. If not, please don't review the article. Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 22:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alex,

Thank you for your work at Articles for Creation. However, when declining an article submission, please look for relevant notability guidelines first, for example WP:PROFESSOR before making a comment like this. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You accepted Farouk Adatia for creation. Per WP:POLITICIAN, candidates are generally not notable. Also, Facebook cannot be used as a reference when talking about third parties. When the article was pushed to main space, it was tagged with 5 tags. I've noticed some other you created are also being tagged, have major copy edit problems, etc. Bgwhite (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Files for upload pages.

A few tips that you might find helpful:

• Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
• The reviewers' talk page is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.
• Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
• You might wish to add {{AFC status}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
• Several of our members monitor the #wikipedia-en-help ^connect IRC channel, and you are welcome to join in to ask Wikipedia-related questions.
• The IRC channel #wikipedia-en-afc ^connect is used occasionally for internal discussion regarding the Articles for Creation process, and also serves as a recent changes feed, displaying all edits made in the Articles for Creation namespace.
• The help desk is the place where new editors can ask questions about their submissions. You are welcome to help in answering their questions.

Once again, welcome to the project. Pol430 talk to me 21:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My submission for "Willpower paradox" It is meant to be a stub at this point - I will improve on it later. In any case, isn't the article as good as Inventor's paradox?

Kgashok (talk) 01:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

SAP HANA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to EMC, KPI, MVCC and Scale-up

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I come here to leave a message to you mainly because I found out you were the creater of the page SAP HANA. This page was recently deleted by the community due to multiple reasons. I am wondering if you are still interested in helping the page back up. Thanks.2A00:FE00:BFFE:2201:0:0:0:400 (talk) 22:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]